Xiaomi Redmi 9C vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 12, 2020 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2020 2023

Physical

Volume 114.28 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 196 g 192 g
Height 164.9 mm 168 mm
Width 77 mm 78 mm
Thickness 9 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Gray
  • Sunrise Orange
  • Twilight Blue
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.53 " 6.74 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.1 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.26 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.75 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 9CXiaomi Poco C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions164.9 x 77 x 9 mm168 x 78 x 8.1 mmPoco C65 is taller and wider but thinner, slightly affecting ergonomics. Redmi 9C is more compact.
Weight196g192gNegligible difference in weight; both feel similar in hand.
Display
Size6.53"6.74"Poco C65 provides a slightly more immersive viewing experience for videos and games.
Resolution720x1600720x1600Both offer the same level of sharpness, but on the larger screen of Poco C65, images might appear slightly less sharp.
Refresh Rate60Hz90HzPoco C65 provides smoother scrolling and animations, improving the overall user experience.
Performance
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G35MediaTek Helio G85Poco C65 offers significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score110,490237,768Poco C65 performs more than twice as fast, indicating a major performance gap.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G52 MC2Poco C65 has a more powerful GPU, resulting in better graphics performance in games and graphically intensive apps.
Camera
Main Camera13MP, f/2.250MP, f/1.8Poco C65 captures much more detailed photos, especially in good lighting. Wider aperture allows for better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera5MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2Poco C65 produces sharper and more detailed selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth record at the same resolution.
Slow-motion videoNo, 30 fpsYes, 120 fpsXiaomi Poco C65 can capture slow-motion video
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery life under typical usage.
Charging10W18WPoco C65 charges significantly faster, reducing downtime.
Reverse chargingNoYesPoco C65 can act as power bank for other devices
Software
OSAndroid 10Android 13Poco C65 has a more recent Android version, offering the latest features, security updates, and performance improvements.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11 b/g/n802.11 a/b/g/n/acPoco C65 supports faster and more stable Wi-Fi connections, especially on 5GHz networks.
Bluetooth5.05.3Poco C65 features a newer Bluetooth version, potentially offering improved connection stability and efficiency.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeidouGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoPoco C65 has better location accuracy due to Galileo support
Storage
Internal Storage32/64/128GB128/256GBPoco C65 offers more storage, allowing users to store more apps, photos, and videos.
RAM2/3/4GB4/6/8GBPoco C65 provides smoother multitasking and can handle more demanding apps.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage
Security
Fingerprint SensorRear-mountedSide-mountedSide-mounted fingerprint sensor on Poco C65 is generally more convenient and faster to access.
Sensors
SensorsAccelerometer, Magnetometer, ProximityAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, ProximityPoco C65 has more sensors

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco C65 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Helio G85 chipset offers a substantial performance boost over the Helio G35, resulting in smoother multitasking and gaming.
  • Superior Camera: 50MP camera captures much more detailed photos and videos, especially in good lighting conditions.
  • Faster Charging: 18W charging reduces downtime compared to the 10W charging on the Redmi 9C.
  • Newer Software: Android 13 provides the latest features, security updates, and performance optimizations.
  • Higher Refresh Rate: 90Hz display offers smoother scrolling and animations.
  • More Storage and RAM Options: Provides higher storage and memory configurations for better multitasking.

Xiaomi Redmi 9C Advantages:

  • Potentially lower price: As an older model, it might be available at a lower price point, making it attractive to budget-conscious users.
  • Slightly more compact: Smaller dimensions might make it easier to handle for some users.

Trade-offs:

  • Choosing the Redmi 9C means sacrificing significant performance, camera quality, and software features for a potentially lower price.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco C65:

  • Ideal Users:
    • Users who prioritize performance for gaming and multitasking.
    • Photography enthusiasts who want better image quality.
    • Users who value having the latest Android features and security updates.
  • Use Cases:
    • Mobile gaming: Smoother gameplay due to the more powerful chipset and GPU.
    • Social media: Capturing and sharing high-quality photos and videos.
    • Everyday multitasking: Running multiple apps simultaneously without performance issues.

Xiaomi Redmi 9C:

  • Ideal Users:
    • Extremely budget-conscious users who need a basic smartphone for essential tasks.
    • Users who primarily use their phone for calls, texts, and light browsing.
  • Use Cases:
    • Basic communication: Making calls and sending texts.
    • Light browsing: Checking emails and browsing simple websites.
    • Backup phone: A reliable device to have as a spare.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi 9C might be more affordable.
  2. How important is performance to you? If you game or multitask heavily, the Poco C65 is essential.
  3. How much do you value camera quality? The Poco C65 offers a significantly better camera experience.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Tight Budget, Basic Use: If your budget is extremely limited and you only need a phone for basic communication, the Redmi 9C could be a viable option.
  • Scenario 2: Balanced Performance and Price: If you want good performance and camera capabilities without breaking the bank, the Poco C65 is the clear winner.
  • Scenario 3: Performance is Paramount: If you prioritize gaming and smooth multitasking above all else, the Poco C65 is the better choice.

My Choice

I would choose the Xiaomi Poco C65.

Reasoning:

While the Redmi 9C might be slightly more affordable, the Poco C65 offers a far superior user experience across nearly every aspect. The performance difference between the Helio G35 and Helio G85 is significant, making the Poco C65 a much smoother and more enjoyable device to use daily. The camera improvements alone justify the price difference, as the 50MP sensor captures significantly better photos and videos. The faster charging, higher refresh rate display, and newer software are all valuable additions that contribute to a better overall experience. Although both phones lack expandable storage, the larger base storage options of the Poco C65 alleviate this issue. Considering the longevity and usability improvements, the Poco C65 provides a much better value proposition.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.