Xiaomi Redmi 9C vs Samsung Galaxy M13 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 12, 2020 July 1, 2022
Release Year 2020 2022

Physical

Volume 114.28 cm³ 106.84 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 196 g 192 g
Height 164.9 mm 165.4 mm
Width 77 mm 76.9 mm
Thickness 9 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Gray
  • Sunrise Orange
  • Twilight Blue
  • Light Blue
  • Deep Green
  • Orange Copper

Display

Screen Size 6.53 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.1 % 82.5 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.26 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.75 mAh/cm³ 46.8 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Exynos 850 (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G52

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 9CSamsung Galaxy M13Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions164.9 × 77 × 9 mm, 196g165.4 × 76.9 × 8.4 mm, 192gM13 is slightly thinner and lighter, potentially more comfortable for prolonged use.
Build Quality (Screen)UnknownCorning Gorilla Glass 5M13 offers better screen protection against scratches and minor impacts.
Fingerprint Sensor LocationRear-mountedSide-mountedSide-mounted might be more convenient for some users, depending on grip and habits.

| Display | | | | | Size | 6.53" | 6.6" | Negligible difference in size; both offer ample screen real estate. | | Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2408 | M13 has a significantly sharper display, better for detailed content and media consumption. | | PPI | 269 | 400 | M13 provides noticeably clearer text and images, reducing pixelation. | | Technology | IPS LCD | PLS LCD | IPS LCD generally provides better viewing angles and color accuracy, but the difference can be subtle. | | Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Specification Error: Brightness cannot be 0 nits, this is a key specification not available to compare. | | Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | Standard refresh rate; both suitable for general use but not optimized for fast-paced gaming. |

| Performance | | | | | Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Exynos 850 (8 nm) | M13's chipset is more power-efficient due to smaller process size and offers slightly better overall performance. | | AnTuTu Score | 110,490 | 117,300 | M13 offers slightly smoother performance in everyday tasks and light gaming. | | GPU | PowerVR GE8320 (IMG PowerVR GE8320) | Mali-G52 (ARM Mali-G52) | M13's GPU likely provides slightly better graphics performance in games and apps. | | RAM | 2 GB / 3 GB / 4 GB | 4 GB / 6 GB | M13 with 6GB RAM allows for smoother multitasking and running more apps in the background. |

| Camera | | | | | Main Camera | 13MP, f/2.2 | 50MP, f/1.8 | M13 captures much more detailed photos, especially in good lighting; wider aperture improves low-light performance. | | Wide Angle Lens| None | 5MP, f/2.2 | M13 allows you to capture a wider field of view for landscape and group shots. | | Selfie Camera | 5MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/2.2 | M13 takes slightly sharper and more detailed selfies. | | Video Recording | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | Both are adequate for basic video recording and social media sharing. | | Autofocus Type | Autofocus | Phase detection autofocus (PDAF) | M13 focuses faster, especially in dynamic or low-light conditions |

| Battery | | | | | Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Similar battery life under typical usage scenarios. | | Charging | 10W | 15W | M13 charges faster, reducing downtime. |

| Software & Connectivity | | | | | OS | Android 10 | Android 12 | M13 has a newer OS, offering the latest features, security updates, and potentially better performance. | | Wi-Fi | 802.11b/g/n | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | M13 supports faster and more stable Wi-Fi connections, especially on 5GHz networks. | | GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | M13 has slightly better location accuracy due to Galileo support. | | Storage Expandable | No expandable storage | No expandable storage | Both phones are limited to the built-in storage, so choose the storage variant wisely. |

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi 9C Advantages:

  • Slightly smaller width.

Practical Implications:

  • May fit better in smaller hands.

Samsung Galaxy M13 Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution and PPI for clearer visuals.
  • Better Camera System: Higher resolution main camera, inclusion of an ultrawide lens, and a better front camera.
  • Faster Charging: 15W charging reduces charging time compared to 10W.
  • Newer OS: Android 12 offers improved features, security, and performance compared to Android 10.
  • Better Wi-Fi: Supports 802.11ac for faster and more stable Wi-Fi connections.
  • Side-mounted fingerprint sensor: More convenient for unlocking.
  • Gorilla Glass 5: Better screen protection

Practical Implications:

  • Superior multimedia experience, especially for content consumption.
  • More versatile camera for various shooting scenarios.
  • Improved user experience due to faster charging and a newer OS.

Trade-offs:

  • The Xiaomi Redmi 9C might be slightly cheaper, but this depends on current market prices. The trade-off is significantly lower specifications in key areas like the display and camera.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi 9C:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users with basic smartphone needs.
  • Use Cases: Making calls, sending texts, basic social media browsing, and light app usage.
  • Price-to-Value: Only if significantly cheaper, the Redmi 9C provides basic functionality.

Samsung Galaxy M13:

  • Ideal User: Users who value a good display, a versatile camera, and a modern user experience on a budget.
  • Use Cases: Watching videos, taking photos, social media, moderate gaming, and everyday productivity.
  • Price-to-Value: Offers significantly better value due to its superior features and performance.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. What is my budget? If the budget is extremely tight, the Redmi 9C might be the only option (assuming a large price difference).
  2. How important is the display quality? If you consume a lot of video content or browse social media frequently, the M13's higher resolution display is a significant advantage.
  3. How important is the camera system? If you take photos regularly, the M13's higher resolution camera and inclusion of an ultrawide lens make it a better choice.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Basic User on a Tight Budget: If the price difference is significant, the Xiaomi Redmi 9C can suffice for basic tasks.
  • Scenario 2: Everyday User: The Samsung Galaxy M13 offers a better overall experience with a superior display, camera, and faster performance.
  • Scenario 3: Multimedia Enthusiast: The Samsung Galaxy M13 is the clear winner due to its higher resolution display.

My Choice

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M13. While both phones aim for the budget segment, the M13 offers a more well-rounded and future-proof experience. The superior display quality is a major factor for me, as I consume a lot of content on my phone. The better camera system and faster charging are also significant advantages that would improve my daily usage. While the Redmi 9C might be slightly cheaper, the overall value and usability of the M13 make it the better investment.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.