Xiaomi Redmi 9C vs Samsung Galaxy A34 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 12, 2020 March 24, 2023
Release Year 2020 2023

Physical

Volume 114.28 cm³ 103.3 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.32 "/g
Weight 196 g 199 g
Height 164.9 mm 161.3 mm
Width 77 mm 78.1 mm
Thickness 9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Gray
  • Sunrise Orange
  • Twilight Blue
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime

Display

Screen Size 6.53 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.1 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.26 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.75 mAh/cm³ 48.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 9CSamsung Galaxy A34Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions164.9 × 77 × 9 mm, 196g161.3 × 78.1 × 8.2 mm, 199gSimilar size and weight; A34 slightly wider, 9C slightly taller and thicker. Minimal practical difference.
Display
Size6.53"6.6"Negligible size difference.
Resolution720x16001080x2340A34: Sharper image, better for reading, viewing photos/videos.
PPI269390A34: Text and images appear significantly clearer.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDA34: Deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, better contrast, more energy efficient with dark mode.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzA34: Smoother scrolling, animations, and gaming experience.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth: Unknown. This will significantly impact outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G35 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)A34: Faster app loading, smoother multitasking, better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score110,490532,300A34: Demonstrates significantly higher performance across all tasks.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G68 MC4A34: Superior graphics performance, enabling better gaming and video editing.
Camera
Main Camera13MP, f/2.248MP, f/1.8A34: Better image quality, especially in low light; more detailed photos.
Selfie Camera5MP, f/2.213MP, f/2.2A34: Higher resolution selfies with better detail.
Wide Angle LensNo5MP, f/2.2A34: Allows capturing wider scenes in a single shot.
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fpsA34: Higher quality video recording; 1080p at 60fps offers smoother motion.
StabilizationNoYesA34: Less shaky videos, especially while moving.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery life, assuming similar usage patterns.
Charging10W25WA34: Faster charging times, reducing downtime.
Software
OSAndroid 10Android 13A34: Newer features, security updates, and potentially longer software support.
Storage
Internal32/64/128GB128/256GBA34: More space for apps, photos, videos.
RAM2/3/4GB6/8GBA34: Smoother multitasking, ability to run more apps simultaneously without slowdown.
ExpandableNoNoLimited by internal storage.
AudioBasicDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersA34: Immersive audio experience with better sound separation.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11b/g/n802.11a/b/g/n/acA34: Faster and more stable Wi-Fi connections, especially on 5GHz networks.
Bluetooth5.05.3A34: Slightly improved range, speed, and power efficiency.
SensorsAccelerometer, Magnetometer, ProximityAccelerometer, Gyroscope, ProximityA34: Gyroscope enables better motion tracking for gaming and VR/AR applications.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi 9C Advantages:

  • Potentially lower price (depending on current market).
  • Macro lens for close-up photography

Practical Implications:

  • The Redmi 9C may appeal to users on a very tight budget who prioritize basic functionality.
  • The macro lens can be useful for detailed close-up shots of small objects.

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Significantly better display (AMOLED, higher resolution, 120Hz refresh rate).
  • Much faster processor and GPU.
  • Superior camera system (higher resolution, wider aperture, wide-angle lens, 4K video, OIS).
  • More RAM and storage.
  • Newer Android version with longer software support.
  • Stereo speakers and Dolby Atmos for improved audio.
  • Faster charging.
  • Gyroscope for gaming and VR.
  • Better Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity.

Practical Implications:

  • The A34 offers a vastly superior user experience in almost every aspect, from daily tasks to gaming and media consumption.
  • The improved camera allows for significantly better photos and videos.
  • The newer software ensures security and access to the latest features.

Trade-offs:

  • The Samsung Galaxy A34 will likely cost significantly more than the Xiaomi Redmi 9C.
  • The Xiaomi Redmi 9C is slightly taller and thicker, which may be a consideration for some users.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi 9C Ideal User:

  • Users with extremely limited budgets.
  • Individuals who primarily use a phone for basic communication (calls, texts).
  • Those who don't require high performance or advanced features.
  • Users who specifically need a macro lens.

Use Cases:

  • Emergency phone.
  • Basic phone for elderly users or young children.

Samsung Galaxy A34 Ideal User:

  • Users who want a well-rounded smartphone with a good display, performance, and camera.
  • Individuals who enjoy gaming, watching videos, and taking photos.
  • Those who value smooth performance and a modern user experience.
  • Users who want a phone that will receive software updates for several years.

Use Cases:

  • Daily driver for work and personal use.
  • Gaming on the go.
  • Photography and videography.
  • Media consumption (streaming videos, listening to music).

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Xiaomi Redmi 9C offers decent value at its price point, but it is severely limited in its capabilities.
  • The Samsung Galaxy A34 offers excellent value considering its features and performance. The higher price is justified by the significantly better user experience.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is my budget? The price difference is substantial.
  2. What are my primary use cases? Basic communication vs. gaming, photography, etc.
  3. How important is long-term software support? The A34 will receive updates for longer.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Tight Budget, Basic Needs: If your budget is extremely limited and you only need a phone for calls and texts, the Xiaomi Redmi 9C might suffice.
  • Scenario 2: Balanced Performance and Features: If you want a phone that can handle most tasks smoothly, takes good photos, and will last for several years, the Samsung Galaxy A34 is the clear choice.
  • Scenario 3: Photography Enthusiast on a Budget: While the A34 is better, consider other options within the A34 price range that may have a better camera system if photography is your primary concern.

My Choice

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A34.

Reasoning:

While the Xiaomi Redmi 9C might seem appealing due to its potentially lower price, the Samsung Galaxy A34 offers a vastly superior user experience across almost every metric that matters to me. As someone who uses their phone for a variety of tasks including photography, media consumption, and light gaming, the A34's better display, faster processor, better camera, and modern software are well worth the extra cost. The longevity provided by the more recent software and superior hardware also makes it a more sensible choice.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.