Xiaomi Redmi 9C vs Realme C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C65
Realme C65
Realme

General

Launch Date August 12, 2020 April 1, 2024
Release Year 2020 2024

Physical

Volume 114.28 cm³ 95.2 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.61 "/g
Weight 196 g 185 g
Height 164.9 mm 164.6 mm
Width 77 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 9 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Gray
  • Sunrise Orange
  • Twilight Blue
  • Purple Nebula
  • Black Milky Way

Display

Screen Size 6.53 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1604
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.1 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 264 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 625 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.26 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.75 mAh/cm³ 52.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 9CRealme C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions164.9 x 77 x 9 mm164.6 x 76.1 x 7.6 mmRealme C65 is slightly more compact and noticeably thinner, making it easier to handle and more pocketable.
Weight196g185gRealme C65 is slightly lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.53"6.67"Realme C65 offers a slightly larger viewing area, better for media consumption.
Resolution720x1600720x1604Both are similar, neither offers particularly sharp visuals.
Refresh Rate60Hz90HzRealme C65 will have smoother scrolling and animations, a more fluid user experience.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsWithout brightness details, it's impossible to comment on outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G35 (12nm)Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Realme C65's G85 chipset is significantly more powerful, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming.
AnTuTu Score110,490225,154Quantifies the performance difference, Realme C65 offers over double the performance.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G52 MC2Realme C65's GPU is better for gaming and graphically intensive tasks.
Camera
Main Camera13MP, f/2.250MP, f/1.8Realme C65's higher resolution and wider aperture should result in significantly better image quality, especially in low light.
Selfie Camera5MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.0Realme C65's selfie camera should produce sharper and brighter selfies.
Portrait Mode2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Similar portrait mode capabilities.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4NoneXiaomi Redmi 9C can take close-up macro shots, a feature missing from Realme C65.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth record similar quality video. Realme C65 has better slow motion support.
Camera FeaturesTriple Camera, Manual Focus, Continuous ShootingDual Camera, Digital Image Stabilization, PDAFXiaomi includes Manual Focus and continuous shooting and an additional macro lense. Realme includes PDAF for faster and reliable autofocus.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery life expected.
Charging10W45WRealme C65 charges much faster, significantly reducing charging time.
Software
OSAndroid 10Android 14Realme C65 has a much newer version of Android, with improved features, security, and performance.
Storage
Internal Storage32/64/128GB128/256GBRealme C65 offers more storage capacity.
RAM2/3/4GB6/8GBRealme C65 has significantly more RAM, leading to better multitasking.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone allows for storage expansion.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11 b/g/n802.11 a/b/g/n/acRealme C65 supports 5GHz Wi-Fi, potentially faster and more stable connections.
Bluetooth5.05.0Both are similar, both support A2DP, EDR, LE. Realme C65 additionally supports HID (Human Interface Profile)
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeidouGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoRealme C65 offers more accurate location tracking due to support for additional satellite systems.
Security
Fingerprint SensorRear-mountedSide-mountedSide-mounted fingerprint sensor is generally considered more convenient.
SensorsAccelerometer, Magnetometer, Ultrasonic proximity virtualAccelerometer, Compass, ProximityGood sensor configuration for most applications
## 2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi 9C Advantages:

  • Macro Lens: Dedicated macro lens for close-up photography.

Practical Implications:

  • The Redmi 9C might appeal to users specifically interested in macro photography.

Realme C65 Advantages:

  • Significantly Faster Performance: Helio G85 chipset provides a much smoother and more responsive user experience.
  • Superior Camera Quality: Higher resolution main and selfie cameras with wider apertures capture better photos and videos, especially in low light.
  • Faster Charging: 45W charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • More RAM: 6/8GB RAM allows for smoother multitasking and running more apps simultaneously.
  • More Storage: 128/256GB options offer more space for apps, photos, and videos.
  • Newer Android Version: Android 14 provides the latest features, security updates, and performance improvements.
  • Smoother Display: 90Hz refresh rate display for smoother scrolling and animations.

Practical Implications:

  • The Realme C65 is a better all-around performer, suitable for users who prioritize performance, camera quality, and a modern software experience.
  • The faster charging, higher storage, and increased RAM improve overall usability and convenience.

Trade-offs:

  • The Realme C65 sacrifices the dedicated macro lens found on the Redmi 9C.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi 9C Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users with very basic smartphone needs.
  • Users who specifically want a dedicated macro lens for close-up photography.

Use Cases:

  • Basic communication (calls, texts).
  • Simple web browsing.
  • Casual photography in good lighting conditions.

Realme C65 Ideal User:

  • Users who want a well-rounded smartphone experience with good performance and camera capabilities at an affordable price.
  • Users who value fast charging, ample storage, and a modern operating system.

Use Cases:

  • Everyday use including social media, web browsing, and media consumption.
  • Casual gaming.
  • Photography in various lighting conditions.
  • Multitasking between multiple apps.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Realme C65 offers a significantly better price-to-value ratio due to its superior performance, camera, and features, justifying its likely higher price.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi 9C is likely cheaper, but the Realme C65 offers significantly more value for a slightly higher price.
  2. How important is performance? If you need a phone for more than basic tasks, the Realme C65 is the clear choice.
  3. How important is the camera? The Realme C65's camera is far better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9C except for macro photography.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Extremely tight budget, basic needs: The Xiaomi Redmi 9C might suffice.
  • Scenario 2: Balanced performance and features: The Realme C65 is the better option.
  • Scenario 3: Primary focus is macro photography: The Xiaomi Redmi 9C is the only option with that hardware feature.

My Choice

I would choose the Realme C65. The performance difference is substantial, and the newer Android version, faster charging, and superior camera make it a significantly better overall experience. While the Xiaomi Redmi 9C might be cheaper, the Realme C65 provides much more value and will likely remain usable for a longer period of time due to its more powerful hardware and software. The lack of a macro lens is a minor trade-off compared to the significant improvements in other areas.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.