Xiaomi Redmi 9C vs Motorola Moto E13 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 12, 2020 February 13, 2023
Release Year 2020 2023

Physical

Volume 114.28 cm³ 104.68 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.62 "/g
Weight 196 g 179.5 g
Height 164.9 mm 164.2 mm
Width 77 mm 75 mm
Thickness 9 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Gray
  • Sunrise Orange
  • Twilight Blue
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White

Display

Screen Size 6.53 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.1 % 82.8 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.26 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.75 mAh/cm³ 47.77 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No No
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 9CMotorola Moto E13Practical Impact
Dimensions164.9 × 77 × 9 mm164.2 × 75 × 8.5 mmRedmi 9C is slightly wider and thicker, potentially feeling bulkier in hand. Moto E13 is more compact.
Weight196g179.5gMoto E13 is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedNeed more info, but impacts durability & feel.

Display

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 9CMotorola Moto E13Practical Impact
Size6.53"6.5"Negligible difference in screen size; both offer a large viewing area.
Resolution720x1600720x1600Identical resolution results in similar sharpness; acceptable for basic use, but not ideal for pixel-peeping.
PPI269270Practically the same pixel density, so the screens look nearly identical.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDSimilar color reproduction and viewing angles; generally good for the price range.
Refresh Rate60Hz60HzStandard refresh rate; scrolling and animations will not be as smooth as higher refresh rate displays.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsInaccurate data. Brightness is crucial. Without actual values, screen visibility in sunlight is unknown.

Performance

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 9CMotorola Moto E13Practical Impact
ChipsetMediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)Moto E13's Unisoc T606 offers significantly better performance for everyday tasks and gaming.
AnTuTu Score110,490253,200Moto E13 scores much higher, indicating smoother multitasking and faster app loading.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G57 MP1Moto E13's GPU is better for gaming and graphics-intensive apps.
RAM2GB/3GB/4GB2GB/4GB/8GBMoto E13 offers an 8GB RAM option, which is beneficial for heavy multitasking and future-proofing.

Camera

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 9CMotorola Moto E13Practical Impact
Main Camera13MP, f/2.213MPSimilar main cameras; image quality likely comparable in good lighting.
Selfie Camera5MP, f/2.25MPSimilar selfie cameras; suitable for basic video calls and social media.
Additional Lenses2MP Macro, 2MP DepthNoneRedmi 9C offers more versatile photography, albeit with limited quality from the 2MP sensors.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth phones record video at the same quality; good enough for basic social media sharing.
FeaturesDigital zoom, Triple camera, Autofocus, Touch focus, Manual focus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timerDigital zoom, Autofocus, Touch focus, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, Front FlashRedmi 9C provides Triple camera, Manual focus, but Moto E13 gives Front Flash

Battery

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 9CMotorola Moto E13Practical Impact
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery life; expect all-day usage with moderate use.
Charging10W Fast Charging10W Fast ChargingSlow charging speeds; expect long charging times.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi 9C Advantages:

  • Additional Cameras: Dedicated macro and depth sensors offer more photographic options, though image quality may be limited.
  • Rear-mounted fingerprint sensor: Security features are an important part of modern phones

Practical Implications: More camera versatility (macro and depth), physical security.

Motorola Moto E13 Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: Unisoc T606 chipset offers a substantial performance boost compared to the Helio G35.
  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for extended use.
  • Newer Android Version: Ships with Android 13.
  • Front Flash: Provides better selfie capabilities

Practical Implications: Smoother experience, longer software support, easier to handle, better selfies

Trade-offs:

  • Redmi 9C: Offers more camera versatility, but at the cost of significantly lower overall performance.
  • Moto E13: Sacrifices dedicated macro and depth cameras for a much smoother and more responsive user experience.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi 9C Ideal User:

  • Users on a very tight budget prioritizing camera versatility (macro and depth sensors) over performance.
  • Individuals who rarely play games or use demanding apps.
  • Those who need physical security.

Use Cases:

  • Basic photography (casual snapshots)
  • Simple social media browsing
  • Making calls and sending texts

Motorola Moto E13 Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users seeking the best possible performance for the price.
  • Individuals who value a smooth and responsive user interface.
  • Those who want the latest Android version.

Use Cases:

  • Everyday app usage (social media, email, browsing)
  • Light gaming
  • Video streaming
  • Taking selfies in the dark

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. How important is performance? If you need a responsive phone, the Moto E13 is the better choice.
  2. Do you value camera versatility? If macro and depth lenses are essential, the Redmi 9C has the advantage.
  3. How important is having the latest software? If so, the Moto E13 is better.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Tight budget, basic needs: If the price difference is minimal, the Moto E13 is still the better option due to its superior performance.
  • Scenario 2: Photography enthusiast on a budget: The Redmi 9C offers more camera features, but manage expectations regarding image quality.
  • Scenario 3: Smooth user experience is a priority: The Moto E13 is the clear winner due to its significantly better performance and newer software.

What I would choose and why:

I would choose the Motorola Moto E13.

While the Xiaomi Redmi 9C offers extra camera functionality with its macro and depth sensors, the performance difference is too significant to ignore. A slow and laggy phone can be incredibly frustrating, even for basic tasks. The Unisoc T606 in the Moto E13 offers a much smoother and more responsive experience, making it a more enjoyable device to use daily. Furthermore, I value having a newer Android version (Android 13) for security updates and potential feature enhancements. The lighter weight of the Moto E13 is also a plus for portability and comfort. The Front Flash would also be useful for me, as I take a lot of selfies in dim lighting.

While the Redmi 9C's fingerprint sensor would be useful, it's not as useful as the many pros of the Moto E13.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.