Xiaomi Redmi 13C vs vivo X100 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 10, 2023 November 21, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 106.14 cm³ 109.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.51 "/g 3.07 "/g
Weight 192 g 221 g
Height 168 mm 164.1 mm
Width 78 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Glacier White
  • Navy Blue
  • Clover Green
  • White
  • Sunset Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.78 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.7 % 89.8 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 452 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 117.47 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.11 mAh/cm³ 49.1 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5400 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Immortalis-G720 MC12

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 13Cvivo X100 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions168 x 78 x 8.1 mm164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9 mmThe vivo is slightly shorter, narrower, but thicker. The Redmi 13C might feel slightly less premium due to likely material choices associated with its price range.
Weight192g221gThe Redmi is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare without more information.
Display
Size6.74"6.78"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
TypeIPS LCDLTPO AMOLEDThe vivo offers significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially improved power efficiency due to the LTPO technology allowing for variable refresh rates.
Resolution720x1600 (HD+)1260x2800 (QHD+)The vivo has a much sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzThe vivo will provide smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness600 nits (HBM)3000 nitsThe vivo will be far more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4nm)The Dimensity 9300 is significantly more powerful, enabling smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance. The 4nm process also implies better power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)The vivo's CPU architecture is considerably more advanced, translating to a substantial performance advantage.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Immortalis-G720 MC12The vivo offers significantly improved graphics performance, beneficial for demanding games and visually intensive applications.
RAM/Storage128GB/6GB, 256GB/8GB256GB/16GBThe vivo offers more RAM, leading to better multitasking capabilities and overall system responsiveness.
Camera
Video Capabilities1080p@30fps8K@30fps, 4K@60fpsThe vivo provides vastly superior video recording capabilities with higher resolution and frame rates. Details about camera sensor size and aperture are missing, preventing a full camera comparison.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5400mAhWhile the vivo has a slightly larger battery, the Dimensity 9300's efficiency might result in similar or even better battery life compared to the Redmi.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare without more information.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi 13C Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for one-handed use and extended periods.
  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.

vivo X100 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly Superior Performance: Smoother experience across all tasks, including demanding games.
  • Much Better Display: Higher resolution, refresh rate, brighter, and uses AMOLED technology for superior visuals.
  • Enhanced Camera Capabilities: Higher resolution video recording.
  • More RAM: Improved multitasking and responsiveness.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi 13C: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality: calling, texting, web browsing, and light social media usage.

vivo X100 Pro: Users who demand high performance, a premium display, and excellent camera capabilities. Suitable for mobile gaming, content creation, and consuming high-quality multimedia.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi 13C is a budget option, while the vivo X100 Pro is a premium device.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications and gaming.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The vivo significantly outperforms the Redmi in these areas.

Scenario-based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Usage: Redmi 13C
  • Demanding User, High-Quality Experience: vivo X100 Pro

My Choice: vivo X100 Pro

While significantly more expensive, the vivo X100 Pro offers a vastly superior user experience across the board. The performance difference alone would be a major factor for me, as I value smooth and responsive performance. The superior display and camera capabilities further solidify my choice. The Redmi 13C is a solid budget option, but the performance and display compromises are too significant for my personal preferences. I prioritize a long-term investment in a device that can handle future demands and provide a consistently enjoyable user experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.