Xiaomi Redmi 13C vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date November 10, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 106.14 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.51 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 192 g 209 g
Height 168 mm 161.7 mm
Width 78 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Glacier White
  • Navy Blue
  • Clover Green
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.74 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.7 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 260 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 110.07 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.11 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 13CSamsung Galaxy A35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions168 x 78 x 8.1 mm161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mmA35 slightly shorter, negligible difference in overall size.
Weight192g209gRedmi 13C noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without this information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 90HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzA35 offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling due to AMOLED technology and higher refresh rate.
Size6.74"6.6"Negligible size difference in real-world usage.
Resolution720 x 1600 (HD+)1080 x 2340 (FHD+)A35 significantly sharper and more detailed due to higher resolution.
Brightness450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM)1000 nits (HBM)A35 significantly brighter, improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Exynos 1380 (5nm)A35 offers significantly better performance and efficiency due to a more advanced and power-efficient 5nm chipset.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A35 has faster and more powerful CPU cores, resulting in smoother multitasking and faster app loading.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G68 MP5A35's GPU provides significantly better gaming and graphics performance.
RAM6GB/8GB8GBA35 offers more RAM in its base configuration, enhancing multitasking capabilities.
Storage128GB/256GB128GB/256GBComparable storage options.
Camera
Rear CameraNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare camera quality and features without detailed specifications.
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps (EIS)A35 offers significantly better video recording capabilities, including 4K resolution and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS).
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhComparable battery capacities. Actual battery life depends on usage and optimization.
Other
OSAndroid 13Android 14A35 ships with a newer Android version, offering potential software features and security updates for a longer period.
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments.
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0, OTGA35's OTG allows connecting peripherals like flash drives and keyboards.
SensorsAccelerometer, Compass, Fingerprint (side-mounted)Accelerometer, Gyro, Compass, Fingerprint (under display)A35 includes a gyroscope for motion sensing and an under-display fingerprint sensor, potentially offering a more premium feel.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi 13C Advantages:

  • Lighter: Noticeably lighter, more comfortable for extended use.
  • Lower Price: Expected to be more affordable given the "low price" range.

Samsung Galaxy A35 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology with higher resolution, refresh rate, and brightness.
  • Significantly Better Performance: More powerful and efficient chipset, CPU, and GPU.
  • Enhanced Camera: Supports 4K video recording and EIS.
  • Newer Software: Ships with Android 14 and potentially longer software support.
  • More RAM in Base Model: Improved multitasking capabilities.
  • Added Features: Gyroscope and under-display fingerprint sensor.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi 13C: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality, calling, texting, and light web browsing.

Samsung Galaxy A35: Users who value performance, a high-quality display, and a more premium experience. Suitable for gaming, media consumption, and multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi 13C is expected to be significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone uses? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications and gaming.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The A35 excels in these areas.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A35

While the Redmi 13C offers a lower price point, the Galaxy A35 provides a significant upgrade in almost every aspect that impacts the user experience. The superior display, significantly improved performance, better camera capabilities, and newer software make it a much more compelling device for long-term use. Even with a potentially higher price, the A35's value proposition is stronger for a broader range of users. The improved performance and features will make daily tasks more enjoyable and prevent the phone from feeling outdated quickly. The lighter weight of the Redmi 13C is a minor advantage compared to the substantial benefits offered by the A35.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.