Xiaomi Redmi 12 vs Motorola Moto G55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 15, 2023 September 6, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 105.49 cm³ 96.6 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 198.5 g 179 g
Height 168.6 mm 161.6 mm
Width 76.3 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Polar Silver
  • Sky Blue
  • Moonstone Silver
  • Forest Grey
  • Smoky Green
  • Twilight Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.79 " 6.49 "
Resolution 1080 x 2460 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 550 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.45 mAh/in² 118.71 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.4 mAh/cm³ 51.76 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version N/A 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 12Motorola Moto G55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)168.6 x 76.3 x 8.2161.6 x 73.8 x 8.1Moto G55 is slightly shorter, narrower, and lighter, potentially improving one-handed usability.
Weight (g)198.5179Moto G55 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.796.49Redmi 12 offers a larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24601080 x 2400Negligible difference in sharpness due to similar pixel density.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Moto G55's higher refresh rate provides smoother animations and scrolling.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology, expecting similar color accuracy and viewing angles. However, specific panel quality can vary and isn't detailed here.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G88 (12nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm)Moto G55's 6nm chipset should offer significantly better performance and power efficiency due to its smaller process node and more powerful CPU cores (Cortex-A78 vs A75).
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Moto G55 has a more powerful CPU architecture resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
GPUMali-G52 MC2IMG BXM-8-256Moto G55 likely has a more powerful GPU, enabling better gaming performance and smoother graphics rendering. Direct comparison is difficult without benchmark scores.
RAM (GB)4/88Moto G55 offers more RAM in the specified variant, enabling better multitasking and preventing apps from closing in the background.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Megapixel count is similar, but image quality depends on sensor size, aperture, and processing, which are not fully detailed here.
Other Cameras8MP Wide, 2MP Macro8MP WideRedmi 12 has a dedicated macro lens, while practical benefits of this are often limited. Moto G55 lacks details on the secondary camera.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fpsMoto G55 offers 60fps recording for smoother video.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity, but actual battery life depends on software optimization and chipset efficiency.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi 12 Advantages:

  • Larger Display: Offers a more immersive experience for media consumption.

Motorola Moto G55 Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: The Dimensity 7025 chipset, more powerful CPU cores, and higher RAM provide a smoother, faster user experience across all tasks.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother scrolling and animations.
  • More Powerful GPU: Better gaming and graphics performance.
  • Lighter and More Compact: Improved one-handed usability and reduced fatigue.
  • 5G Connectivity: Offers faster download and upload speeds in areas with 5G coverage.

Trade-offs:

  • Redmi 12: Sacrifices performance and features for a larger display and lower price.
  • Moto G55: Smaller display compared to Redmi 12. Price is significantly higher.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi 12: Budget-conscious users who prioritize a large display for media consumption and basic smartphone tasks. Ideal for casual web browsing, social media, and video watching.

Motorola Moto G55: Users who value a smooth and responsive experience, even with more demanding tasks. Ideal for gaming, multitasking, and those who want a future-proof phone with 5G connectivity.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi 12 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What is your primary use case? Media consumption vs. demanding tasks/gaming.
  3. How important is future-proofing? The Moto G55 offers 5G.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G55

While the Redmi 12 offers a larger display at a lower price, the Moto G55's superior performance, smoother display, and 5G connectivity make it a better long-term investment. The Dimensity 7025 offers a substantial performance upgrade, resulting in a more responsive and enjoyable user experience. The 120Hz refresh rate significantly enhances daily interactions. Although the Moto G55 is more expensive, the performance and feature upgrades justify the price difference for most users beyond those strictly on a tight budget. The lighter weight is also a plus for comfortable daily use.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.