Xiaomi Redmi 12 vs Motorola Edge 50 Fusion - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 15, 2023 May 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 105.49 cm³ 93.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.83 "/g
Weight 198.5 g 174.9 g
Height 168.6 mm 161.9 mm
Width 76.3 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Polar Silver
  • Sky Blue
  • Moonstone Silver
  • Forest Blue
  • Marshmallow Blue
  • Hot Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.79 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2460 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 91.6 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 550 nits 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.45 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.4 mAh/cm³ 53.48 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - International
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - International
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version N/A 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 12Motorola Edge 50 FusionPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)168.6 x 76.3 x 8.2161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9Redmi 12 is slightly larger and thicker. Fusion might feel more compact in hand.
Weight (g)198.5174.9Fusion is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without material information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDP-OLEDFusion's P-OLED offers deeper blacks, higher contrast, and potentially better power efficiency. Redmi's IPS LCD might be brighter outdoors.
Display Size (inches)6.796.7Negligible size difference in real-world usage.
Resolution1080 x 24601080 x 2400Virtually identical pixel density; sharpness will be comparable.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120/144Fusion's higher refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing perceived performance and responsiveness.
Peak Brightness (nits)5501600Fusion's significantly higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G88 (12nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm)Fusion's newer and more powerful chipset with a smaller process node translates to significantly better performance, efficiency, and thermal management.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)Fusion's CPU boasts faster cores and higher clock speeds, resulting in smoother multitasking and faster app loading.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 710Fusion's Adreno 710 GPU provides a substantial improvement in gaming performance and graphics rendering compared to the Redmi 12's GPU.
RAM4GB/8GB8GB/12GBFusion offers more RAM in its base configuration, enabling better multitasking and preventing app closures in the background.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Megapixel count is similar, but sensor quality and other factors will determine actual image quality. Redmi uses a Samsung sensor, Fusion a Sony sensor.
Ultrawide (MP)813Fusion offers a higher resolution ultrawide camera for capturing wider scenes.
Macro (MP)2Combined with ultrawideDedicated macro on Redmi might offer slightly better close-up shots, but Fusion's combined approach is more common now.
Selfie Camera (MP)832Fusion has a much higher resolution selfie camera, ideal for video calls and high-quality self-portraits.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 4K@30fpsFusion supports higher resolution video recording with Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS).
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacities, but real-world battery life will depend on software optimization and hardware efficiency. Fusion's more efficient chip likely gives it an edge.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, superior CPU/GPU, and more RAM provide a much smoother and faster user experience.
  • Higher quality display: The P-OLED with a 120/144Hz refresh rate and higher peak brightness delivers vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother visuals.
  • More capable camera system: Higher resolution ultrawide and selfie cameras, along with 4K video recording and OIS, offer greater versatility.
  • More up-to-date software: Launches with Android 14 and is promised updates to Android 17.

Xiaomi Redmi 12 Advantages:

  • Potentially lower price: Typically priced lower than the Fusion.
  • Possibly better battery life in some scenarios: While both have 5000mAh batteries, the less demanding hardware of the Redmi 12 might lead to longer battery life for basic tasks.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi 12: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality: calling, texting, web browsing, social media. Not recommended for demanding tasks like gaming or heavy multitasking.

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion: Users who value performance, a high-quality display, and a versatile camera system. Suitable for gaming, content creation, and demanding multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi 12 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone uses? For basic tasks, the Redmi 12 suffices. For demanding tasks, the Fusion is necessary.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The Fusion offers a substantial upgrade in both areas.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Fusion

While the Redmi 12 offers a lower price point, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion is the superior device in almost every aspect. The performance difference alone makes it a much better long-term investment. The improved display, camera system, longer software support, and the relatively small weight difference solidify the Fusion as the clear winner for me. While price is a factor, the significantly enhanced user experience offered by the Fusion justifies the higher cost for most users beyond those with the most restrictive budgets. The Fusion's more future-proof hardware ensures a smoother and more enjoyable user experience for years to come.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.