Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 4, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 105.49 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.41 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 199 g 189 g
Height 168.6 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.3 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Moonstone Silver
  • Jade Black
  • Pastel Blue
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.79 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2460 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 550 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.45 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.4 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 613 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version N/A 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 12 5GZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions168.6 x 76.3 x 8.2 mm164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mmRedmi 12 slightly taller and wider, Blade A75 slightly thicker. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight199g189gBlade A75 is slightly lighter, but the difference (10g) is minimal.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and materials cannot be compared due to lack of information.
Display
Size6.79"6.6"Redmi 12 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD, 90HzBoth have smooth 90Hz displays, but IPS LCD technology generally offers less vibrant colors and narrower viewing angles compared to AMOLED.
Resolution1080 x 2460 (FHD+)720 x 1612 (HD+)Redmi 12 has significantly sharper display due to higher resolution, resulting in clearer text and images.
PPI396267Noticeably higher pixel density on Redmi 12 translates to a sharper and more detailed image.
Brightness550 nits (typical)Not SpecifiedRedmi 12's known typical brightness suggests better visibility outdoors, but a direct comparison is impossible without the Blade A75's brightness specification.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is built on a smaller node (4nm vs 12nm), indicating better power efficiency and potentially higher performance than the Unisoc T606.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Redmi 12's CPU boasts faster cores, leading to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better overall performance.
GPUAdreno 613Mali-G57 MP1Adreno 613 generally offers better gaming performance than the Mali-G57 MP1.
RAM6GB4GBMore RAM in the Redmi 12 allows for smoother multitasking and less frequent app closures in the background.
Storage128GB256GBBlade A75 offers double the storage for more apps, photos, and videos.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacity suggests similar battery life, but real-world usage may vary due to chipset efficiency and other factors.
Other
NFCNoYesBlade A75 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC, while Redmi 12 does not.
OSAndroid 13Android 13Both phones run on the same base Android version.
Price RangeMediumLowBlade A75 is expected to be more affordable.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: Superior chipset, CPU, and GPU translate to a smoother and faster user experience in all aspects.
  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution and PPI result in a much clearer and more detailed visual experience.
  • More future-proof: 5G connectivity provides faster internet speeds and better network coverage in areas where 5G is available.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Larger Storage: Double the storage capacity allows for storing more files locally.
  • NFC Support: Enables contactless payments and data transfer.
  • Lower Price: More budget-friendly option.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G: Suitable for users who prioritize performance, display quality, and future-proofing with 5G. Ideal for gaming, media consumption, and multitasking.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Best suited for budget-conscious users who need ample storage and NFC functionality. Good for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and light media consumption. Less demanding users who prioritize value.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Blade A75 is a more affordable option.
  2. What are your performance expectations? The Redmi 12 provides significantly better performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  3. Do you need 5G or NFC? The Redmi 12 offers 5G, while the Blade A75 offers NFC.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight budget and basic usage: ZTE Blade A75 4G
  • Performance and future-proofing are important: Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers more storage and NFC at a lower price, the Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G's superior performance, sharper display, and 5G connectivity make it a more compelling choice for me. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, which the Redmi 12's powerful processor and higher refresh rate display deliver. The future-proofing offered by 5G connectivity also outweighs the benefits of NFC and larger storage in the long run. The price difference is justifiable for the significant performance gains and overall better user experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.