Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A25 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 4, 2023 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 105.49 cm³ 102.23 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.41 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 199 g 197 g
Height 168.6 mm 161 mm
Width 76.3 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Moonstone Silver
  • Jade Black
  • Pastel Blue
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Personality Yellow
  • Fantasy Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.79 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2460 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 21:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 84.2 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 550 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.45 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.4 mAh/cm³ 48.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 613 Mali-G68

Connectivity

USB Version N/A 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 12 5GSamsung Galaxy A25Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions168.6 x 76.3 x 8.2 mm161 x 76.5 x 8.3 mmGalaxy A25 is slightly shorter and narrower, potentially improving one-handed usability. Depth is nearly identical.
Weight199 g197 gNegligible weight difference.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without material information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 90HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzA25's Super AMOLED offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency. 120Hz provides smoother animations.
Size6.79"6.5"Redmi 12 offers a larger screen for media consumption, while A25's smaller size might be preferable for one-handed use.
Resolution1080 x 24601080 x 2340Similar pixel density (~396 ppi). Redmi 12's taller aspect ratio provides more vertical screen real estate.
Brightness550 nits1000 nits (HBM)A25's significantly higher brightness ensures better outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 4 Gen 2Exynos 1280Exynos 1280 generally offers better performance in benchmarks, translating to smoother multitasking and potentially better gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A25's slightly faster CPU clock speeds might offer marginal performance improvements in demanding tasks.
GPUAdreno 613Mali-G68Mali-G68 generally provides better graphics performance, benefiting gaming and graphically intensive applications.
RAM6GB8GBA25's larger RAM enables smoother multitasking and reduces app reloading.
Storage128GB256GBA25 doubles the storage capacity, allowing for more apps, photos, and videos.
Other
Battery5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacities. Real-world battery life depends on usage patterns and software optimization.
OSAndroid 13Android 14A25 launches with a newer Android version, potentially offering longer software support and newer features.
NFCNoYesA25 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@30fps (EIS)A25 offers superior video recording capabilities with 4K resolution and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother footage.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G Advantages:

  • Larger Display: Better for media consumption.

Samsung Galaxy A25 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology, higher refresh rate (120Hz), and much higher brightness.
  • Better Performance: More powerful chipset, CPU, and GPU, along with more RAM.
  • More Storage: Double the storage capacity.
  • Newer OS: Longer software updates and features.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments.
  • Better Video Recording: 4K resolution and EIS.

Trade-offs:

  • Redmi 12's larger display comes at the cost of slightly larger dimensions.
  • A25's superior features likely come at a higher price point within the "medium price" range.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Redmi 12 5G: Budget-conscious users prioritizing a large display for media consumption.

Galaxy A25: Users who value a premium display, smooth performance, longer software support, and features like NFC and high-quality video recording. Suitable for mobile gaming, photography enthusiasts, and those who rely on contactless payments.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? While both are "medium price," the A25 likely sits at the higher end of that range.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Media consumption, gaming, photography, everyday tasks?
  3. Which features are most important to you? Display quality, performance, battery life, camera features, NFC?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Primarily Media Consumption: Redmi 12 5G
  • Balanced Budget, All-Around Performance: Galaxy A25
  • Gamer or Power User: Galaxy A25

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A25

While the Redmi 12 5G offers a larger display, the Galaxy A25's advantages in crucial areas like display quality, performance, features (NFC, 4K video recording), and software support make it a more compelling overall package for me. The smoother 120Hz AMOLED display, more powerful processor, larger RAM and storage, and longer software update commitment outweigh the slightly smaller screen size. I value a responsive and future-proof device, and the A25 better aligns with my needs. The inclusion of NFC for contactless payments is also a significant factor in my decision.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.