Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G vs Motorola Razr 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola

General

Launch Date August 4, 2023 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 105.49 cm³ 92.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.41 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 199 g 188.4 g
Height 168.6 mm 171.3 mm
Width 76.3 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Moonstone Silver
  • Jade Black
  • Pastel Blue
  • Koala Grey (Steel Wool)
  • Beach Sand (Pumice Stone)
  • Spritz Orange (Arabesque)

Display

Screen Size 6.79 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2460 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 21:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 396 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 550 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.45 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.4 mAh/cm³ 45.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 613 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version N/A 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Redmi 12 5GMotorola Razr 50Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions168.6 x 76.3 x 8.2 mm171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mmRazr 50 is slightly taller and thinner, but significantly more compact when folded. Redmi 12 is a traditional slab phone.
Weight199g188.4gRazr 50 is slightly lighter despite its complex folding mechanism.
FoldableNoYesRazr 50 offers portability and a unique form factor, but with potential durability concerns.
Display
Size6.79"6.9"Razr 50 has a slightly larger screen.
TypeIPS LCDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDRazr 50 offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency due to LTPO. Redmi 12's LCD is generally less vibrant.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzRazr 50 provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak BrightnessNot specified3000 nitsRazr 50 is significantly brighter, ensuring excellent outdoor visibility. Lack of data for Redmi 12 prevents direct comparison.
Resolution1080 x 24601080 x 2640Similar pixel density (Redmi: 396 ppi, Razr: 413 ppi), resulting in comparable sharpness. Razr's slightly taller aspect ratio may be better for content consumption.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 4 Gen 2Dimensity 7300XDimensity 7300X offers significantly better performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz A78 & 6x1.95 GHz A55)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)Razr 50 has a more powerful CPU configuration, leading to faster app loading and multitasking.
GPUAdreno 613Mali-G615 MC2Razr 50's GPU should provide a smoother gaming experience.
RAM6GB12GBRazr 50 offers double the RAM, enabling better multitasking and preventing apps from closing in the background.
Storage128GB512GBRazr 50 offers significantly more storage for apps, photos, and videos.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh4200 mAhRedmi 12 has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life. However, Razr 50's LTPO display could offset this difference. Real-world usage will vary.
Other
OSAndroid 13Android 14Razr 50 ships with the newer Android version, offering potential features and security updates.
NFCNoYesRazr 50 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC.
Video Capabilities1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fpsRazr 50 offers higher resolution and frame rate video recording.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G Advantages:

  • Potentially longer battery life: Larger 5000 mAh battery.
  • Lower price: Typically more affordable than foldable phones.

Motorola Razr 50 Advantages:

  • Foldable design: Increased portability and unique form factor.
  • Superior display: AMOLED with higher refresh rate, brightness, and richer colors.
  • Significantly better performance: More powerful chipset, CPU, and GPU.
  • More RAM and Storage: Enhanced multitasking and ample space for files.
  • NFC: Supports contactless payments.
  • Better video recording capabilities: 4K recording and higher frame rates.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G: Budget-conscious users prioritizing battery life and basic functionality. Suitable for everyday tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and light media consumption.

Motorola Razr 50: Users seeking a unique, portable, and stylish device with a premium display and strong performance. Ideal for users who value portability, multitasking, content consumption, and mobile photography/videography.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Budget: How much are you willing to spend?
  2. Form Factor: Do you prioritize portability and a unique design, or a traditional smartphone experience?
  3. Performance Needs: Do you require high performance for gaming, demanding apps, or multitasking?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited budget and basic needs: Redmi 12 5G
  • Prioritize portability and style over battery life: Razr 50
  • Demand high performance and a premium display: Razr 50

My Choice: Motorola Razr 50

While the Redmi 12 5G offers a larger battery, the Razr 50's significantly superior performance, stunning display, ample RAM and storage, along with the unique foldable design, make it a more compelling choice for me. I value the portability and innovation the Razr 50 offers, and I am willing to compromise slightly on battery life for the enhanced user experience. The inclusion of NFC and superior video recording capabilities further solidifies my preference. The price difference is justifiable considering the significant upgrades the Razr 50 provides.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.