Xiaomi Redmi 10C vs Nothing Phone (1) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 23, 2022 July 16, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 107.83 cm³ 100.16 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.39 "/g
Weight 190 g 193.5 g
Height 169.6 mm 159.2 mm
Width 76.6 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Mint Green
  • Graphite Gray
  • Ocean Blue
  • Black
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.71 " 6.55 "
Resolution 720 x 1650 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 268 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.05 mAh/in² 104.89 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.37 mAh/cm³ 44.93 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 642L

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Redmi 10C vs. Nothing Phone (1): A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the numbers. Let's explore the Redmi 10C and Nothing Phone (1) through the lens of user experience.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureRedmi 10CNothing Phone (1)User Experience Impact
Interface DesignStandard Android SkinCustom Android Skin with GlyphNothing Phone (1)'s unique Glyph interface offers a distinctive visual identity and potentially novel interaction methods.
Interaction FlowBasic, predictablePotentially more complex, uniqueThe Glyph interface might require a learning curve but could offer a more engaging experience.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android AccessibilityStandard Android AccessibilityBoth devices likely offer similar accessibility features based on the Android OS.
Design ErgonomicsLarger, potentially less agileSleeker, more compactRedmi 10C's larger size might be preferable for media consumption, while the Nothing Phone (1) might feel more comfortable in hand.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: A Day in the Life

Imagine two users: a student using the Redmi 10C and a young professional with the Nothing Phone (1).

Student: The Redmi 10C's large 6.71" display makes reading lecture notes and watching videos easier. Its long battery life ensures they can get through the day without recharging. The affordable price point fits their budget.

Professional: The Nothing Phone (1)'s sleek design and unique Glyph interface make a statement. They appreciate the faster processor for multitasking and the higher resolution display for presentations. The Glyph notifications offer a subtle way to stay informed during meetings.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

Both phones cater to different user needs. The Redmi 10C prioritizes affordability and basic functionality, making it suitable for budget-conscious users or those new to smartphones. The Nothing Phone (1) targets users who value design, unique features, and performance.

Recommendations:

  • For users prioritizing value and simplicity: Redmi 10C
  • For users seeking a distinctive design and engaging experience: Nothing Phone (1)

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Choosing between these phones depends on your priorities. Beyond specifications, consider:

  • Visual Appeal: Do you prefer a classic design or something unique?
  • Interaction Style: Do you value simplicity or are you open to learning new interface paradigms?
  • Budget: Which phone aligns with your financial constraints?

My Choice: Nothing Phone (1)

While the Redmi 10C offers excellent value, I would choose the Nothing Phone (1). Its innovative Glyph interface, sleek design, and powerful processor appeal to my appreciation for technology that seamlessly integrates into life. I am willing to embrace the learning curve potentially associated with the Glyph interface for the unique user experience it offers. The higher resolution display and smoother performance align with my needs for productivity and content creation. Although it's a pricier option, the overall design and user experience make the Nothing Phone (1) a more compelling choice for me. It represents a bolder step forward in mobile interaction, and I'm excited by its potential.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.