Xiaomi Redmi 10A vs Xiaomi Poco F4 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 31, 2022 June 27, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 114.42 cm³ 95.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.37 "/g 3.42 "/g
Weight 194 g 195 g
Height 164.9 mm 163.2 mm
Width 77.1 mm 76 mm
Thickness 9 mm 7.7 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Sea Blue
  • Charcoal Black
  • Slate Grey
  • Night Black
  • Moonlight Silver
  • Nebula Green

Display

Screen Size 6.53 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 86.6 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 900 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.26 mAh/in² 101.15 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.7 mAh/cm³ 47.12 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Adreno 650

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Redmi 10A vs. Xiaomi Poco F4: A Tale of Two Xiaomis

Let's embark on a journey to explore two distinct offerings from Xiaomi, the Redmi 10A and the Poco F4. Rather than getting bogged down in a spec sheet showdown, we'll weave a narrative that highlights how design choices translate into real-world user experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureRedmi 10APoco F4User Experience Impact
Interface DesignSimple, functional Android 11Sleek, modern MIUI 13 based on Android 12Poco F4 offers a more visually appealing and feature-rich interface.
Interaction FlowBasic, responsiveFluid, highly responsive, 120Hz refresh ratePoco F4 provides a significantly smoother and more enjoyable user experience, particularly in dynamic content.
AccessibilityStandard Android accessibility featuresAdvanced MIUI accessibility optionsPoco F4 likely offers more comprehensive accessibility customization.
ErgonomicsLarger, thicker body (9mm), plastic buildSlimmer (7.7mm), glass back, premium feelPoco F4 feels more comfortable and premium in hand, while the Redmi 10A prioritizes durability.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: A Day in the Life

Imagine Sarah, a student using the Redmi 10A. She appreciates its long battery life (5000mAh) for attending online classes and browsing social media. However, the lower resolution display (720x1600) and basic processor might lead to occasional lag when multitasking.

Now picture David, a young professional using the Poco F4. He enjoys the vibrant AMOLED display (1080x2400, 120Hz) while editing presentations and streaming videos. The powerful Snapdragon 870 processor ensures seamless multitasking and smooth gaming. He can quickly unlock his phone with the side-mounted fingerprint sensor, a convenient placement for one-handed use.

These scenarios illustrate how seemingly technical differences, like processor speed and display type, create vastly different user experiences.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

User 1: Tech Novice: The Redmi 10A provides a simple, affordable entry point into the smartphone world. Its straightforward interface and long battery life are ideal for basic usage.

User 2: Power User: The Poco F4 caters to demanding users with its high-performance hardware, stunning display, and advanced features like NFC for mobile payments.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Choosing the Right Xiaomi:

The decision hinges on your priorities and how you interact with your phone.

  • Prioritize value and simplicity? The Redmi 10A delivers the essentials at an accessible price.
  • Crave performance and a premium experience? The Poco F4 offers a significant upgrade in every aspect.

Beyond the Specs:

Both phones reflect Xiaomi's design language, but the Poco F4 embraces a more refined aesthetic. It’s a statement of style and capability, while the Redmi 10A prioritizes functionality and affordability.

My Choice: The Poco F4

While the Redmi 10A offers excellent value, I would choose the Poco F4. As a technology communicator focused on user experience, I'm drawn to its fluid performance, vibrant display, and overall premium feel. The 120Hz refresh rate significantly enhances daily interactions, creating a sense of smoothness and responsiveness that I find crucial. Features like NFC, a faster processor, and a higher resolution camera also contribute to a more well-rounded and enjoyable user experience. While the price is higher, the significant improvement in usability and the long-term enjoyment it provides make it the better choice for me. It aligns more closely with my appreciation for well-executed design and its impact on how we interact with technology.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.