Xiaomi Redmi 10A vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 31, 2022 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 114.42 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.37 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 194 g 222 g
Height 164.9 mm 162.3 mm
Width 77.1 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 9 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Sea Blue
  • Charcoal Black
  • Slate Grey
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.53 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 400 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.26 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.7 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

The Redmi 10A vs. Galaxy M35: A Tale of Two Experiences

Let's embark on a journey beyond the spec sheet, exploring the Xiaomi Redmi 10A and Samsung Galaxy M35 as complete user experiences. We'll uncover how design choices shape your daily interaction, moving beyond gigahertz and megapixels to understand what truly matters: you.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureRedmi 10AGalaxy M35User Experience Impact
Interface DesignAndroid 11, basic UIAndroid 14, One UIM35 offers a more modern, feature-rich, and customizable interface.
Interaction FlowBudget-friendly processor; lag possiblePowerful processor; smooth experienceM35 ensures a noticeably faster and more responsive user experience, minimizing frustration.
Accessibility FeaturesBasic Android accessibilityOne UI accessibility enhancementsM35 likely provides a wider range of accessibility options for users with diverse needs.
Design ErgonomicsPlastic body, basic designMore premium materials, refined designM35 offers a more aesthetically pleasing and potentially more durable build.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: A Day in the Life

Imagine you're a student using your phone for note-taking, social media, and casual gaming. With the Redmi 10A, you might experience occasional slowdowns while switching between apps or playing games due to its less powerful processor. The M35's Exynos 1380, however, ensures a seamless transition between tasks, allowing for a more fluid and enjoyable experience.

Scenario: Capturing Memories

Picture yourself at a vibrant street festival. The Redmi 10A captures decent photos in good lighting, but its camera struggles in low light or with fast-moving subjects. The M35, boasting a 50MP main camera with optical image stabilization and advanced features, captures crisp, detailed photos and videos, even in challenging conditions, truly preserving the energy of the event.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For the budget-conscious user: The Redmi 10A offers essential smartphone functionality at an incredibly affordable price.

For the power user: The M35 caters to users demanding smooth performance, a vibrant display, a capable camera, and the latest software features.

For users with accessibility needs: While both devices offer basic Android accessibility features, the M35 with One UI is likely to provide a more comprehensive suite of options.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Beyond raw specs, consider your individual needs and priorities. Do you prioritize affordability above all else? Or is a premium user experience, fueled by a robust processor, superior camera, and the latest software, more critical?

My Choice: The Samsung Galaxy M35

While the Redmi 10A offers incredible value, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M35. My decision is rooted in the belief that technology should seamlessly integrate into our lives, empowering rather than frustrating us. The M35's superior performance, enhanced camera capabilities, more modern OS, and refined design contribute to a significantly more enjoyable and fulfilling user experience. The price difference is justified by the tangible benefits in daily usability, making the M35 a worthwhile investment in the long run. It embodies the principle of user-centered design, making technology an enabler of creativity, productivity, and connection.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.