Xiaomi Poco X6 vs ZTE Blade V60 Design - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 12, 2024 June 1, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 95.82 cm³ 106.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 181 g 198 g
Height 161.2 mm 164.2 mm
Width 74.3 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Champagne Gold
  • Dark Blue
  • Sunrise Violet

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1220 x 2712 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.7 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 446 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1800 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.64 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.23 mAh/cm³ 47.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5100 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 710 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Let's dissect the Xiaomi Poco X6 and the ZTE Blade V60 Design, two smartphones vying for your attention in different price brackets. I'll break down the specs, translate them into real-world experiences, and help you decide which phone might be your perfect fit.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco X6ZTE Blade V60 DesignReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions161.2 x 74.3 x 8 mm164.2 x 75.3 x 8.6 mmPoco X6 is slightly smaller and thinner, potentially more comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight181g198gPoco X6 is noticeably lighter.
Build Materials(Not specified)(Not specified)Build quality and feel are unknown without further information.
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 120Hz, Dolby VisionIPS LCD, 90HzPoco X6 offers vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling. Blade V60 has wider viewing angles.
Size6.67 inches6.6 inchesNegligible size difference.
Resolution1220 x 2712 (446 ppi)720 x 1612 (267 ppi)Poco X6 boasts significantly sharper visuals. Blade V60's display will appear pixelated.
Peak Brightness1800 nits(Not specified)Poco X6 offers exceptional outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Poco X6 offers substantially better performance and efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz & 4x1.95 GHz)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz & 6x1.6 GHz)Poco X6 will handle demanding tasks and multitasking with ease.
GPUAdreno 710Mali-G57 MP1Poco X6 provides a smoother gaming and graphics experience.
RAM12GB6GBPoco X6 allows for more apps to run in the background without slowdowns.
Storage256GB/512GB256GBComparable storage options.
Battery Life
Capacity5100 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacities, though real-world usage will vary due to chipset efficiency.
Other
OSAndroid 13Android 13Both phones run on the latest Android version.
NFCYesYesBoth phones support contactless payments.
Fingerprint SensorUnder DisplaySide-mountedPersonal preference dictates the better location.

2. Key Insights

The Poco X6 significantly outperforms the Blade V60 Design in almost every category. Its superior display, processor, and larger RAM contribute to a noticeably better user experience. The Blade V60 Design's main advantage is its lower price point.

Real-world implications: The Poco X6's AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate translates to a visually stunning and fluid experience, whether you're gaming, scrolling through social media, or watching videos. Its powerful processor ensures smooth multitasking and handles demanding apps with ease. The Blade V60 Design, while functional, will likely exhibit slower performance, less vibrant visuals, and occasional lag.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Poco X6: Suited for users who prioritize performance, a premium display, and smooth multitasking. Ideal for gamers, content creators, and anyone who demands a responsive and visually engaging smartphone experience.

  • Blade V60 Design: Best for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality over top-tier performance. Suitable for light users primarily focused on communication, web browsing, and casual media consumption.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Blade V60 Design is significantly cheaper.
  2. Is performance a priority? The Poco X6 offers a vastly superior performance experience.
  3. How important is display quality? The Poco X6's AMOLED display is a clear winner.

My Choice

I would choose the Xiaomi Poco X6. While it's likely more expensive, the superior display, significantly faster processor, larger RAM, and overall smoother user experience are worth the investment for me. As someone who appreciates a responsive and visually engaging device, the Poco X6 aligns better with my needs and usage patterns. The difference in chipset performance alone – the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 versus the Unisoc T606 – would make a huge difference in my day-to-day use. I value having a phone that can handle demanding tasks without slowing down, and the Poco X6 delivers on that promise. While the Blade V60 Design is a viable option for budget-conscious buyers, the compromises in performance and display quality are too significant for my personal preferences.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.