Xiaomi Poco X6 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 12, 2024 January 15, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 95.82 cm³ 96.66 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g 3.55 "/g
Weight 181 g 188 g
Height 161.2 mm 161.1 mm
Width 74.3 mm 75 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Midnight Black
  • Forest Green
  • Lavender Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1220 x 2712 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.7 % 88.9 %
Pixel Density 446 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness 1200 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1800 nits 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.64 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.23 mAh/cm³ 51.73 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5100 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra
CPU Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 710 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco X6Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.2 x 74.3 x 8161.1 x 75 x 8Virtually identical in size and thickness.
Weight (g)181188Negligible weight difference (7g).
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.67Same screen size.
TypeAMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby VisionAMOLED, 1B colors, 120HzPoco X6 offers significantly better color accuracy and supports Dolby Vision for HDR content. This translates to a more vibrant and dynamic viewing experience.
Resolution1220 x 27121080 x 2400Poco X6 has a sharper display (446 ppi vs 395 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Peak Brightness (nits)18001300Poco X6 can get significantly brighter, improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm)Mediatek Helio G99 UltraSnapdragon 7s Gen 2 generally offers better performance and efficiency than the Helio G99, especially in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2's architecture and higher clock speeds should deliver superior CPU performance.
GPUAdreno 710Mali-G57 MC2Adreno 710 generally offers better graphics performance than the Mali-G57 MC2, resulting in smoother gaming and faster rendering.
RAM12GB/ 256 or 512 GB Storage8GB/256 or 12GB/512GB StorageBoth offer ample storage, but RAM options vary. More RAM can improve multitasking performance.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)51005000Slightly larger battery in the Poco X6, potentially offering slightly longer battery life. However, real-world usage will vary.
Camera
Rear CameraNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare camera quality and features.
Video4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@30/60fps (EIS)1080p@30/60fpsPoco X6 supports 4K video recording and features Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother footage.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X6 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Higher resolution, more colors (68B vs 1B), Dolby Vision, higher peak brightness. This translates to a noticeably better viewing experience.
  • Better Performance: More powerful and efficient chipset (Snapdragon 7s Gen 2), resulting in smoother performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • 4K Video Recording: Offers higher resolution video recording capabilities.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Depending on specific market pricing, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G might be more affordable. This is inferred from historical Redmi vs. Poco pricing but not confirmed.

Trade-offs:

  • Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: Sacrifices display quality and performance for potential cost savings.
  • Poco X6: Might be slightly more expensive.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X6: Users who prioritize display quality, performance, and multimedia consumption (gaming, video watching).

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and don't require the best display or top-tier performance.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco X6 is likely more expensive.
  2. How important is display quality and color accuracy? The Poco X6 significantly outperforms in this area.
  3. What type of tasks will you primarily use the phone for? The Poco X6 is better suited for demanding tasks and gaming.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco X6

The Xiaomi Poco X6 is the clear winner for me. The superior display (higher resolution, wider color gamut, Dolby Vision, higher brightness) and the more powerful processor (Snapdragon 7s Gen 2) make a significant difference in the overall user experience. While we don't have camera specs for comparison, the 4K video recording capability of the Poco X6 adds another point in its favor. I prioritize a smooth and visually engaging experience, and I'm willing to pay a bit more for that. The performance difference between the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 and Helio G99 is substantial enough to justify the potential price difference. While battery capacities are similar, real-world battery life depends heavily on optimization and usage patterns, making a direct comparison difficult without testing.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.