Xiaomi Poco X6 vs Honor 200 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 12, 2024 May 31, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 95.82 cm³ 100.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g 3.41 "/g
Weight 181 g 199 g
Height 161.2 mm 163.3 mm
Width 74.3 mm 75.2 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Black
  • Pink
  • Moonlight White
  • Ocean Cyan

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1220 x 2712 1224 x 2700
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.7 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 446 PPI 437 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1800 nits 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.64 mAh/in² 113.12 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.23 mAh/cm³ 51.64 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5100 mAh 5200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 710 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco X6Honor 200 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.2 x 74.3 x 8 mm163.3 x 75.2 x 8.2 mmHonor 200 Pro is slightly larger and thicker. May impact one-handed usability.
Weight181g199gPoco X6 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Size6.67"6.78"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
TypeAMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby VisionOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDRBoth offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. Poco X6 supports Dolby Vision, while Honor 200 Pro supports a wider color gamut (1B vs 68B). The practical difference in color reproduction might be subtle for average users, but noticeable for professionals.
Peak Brightness1800 nits4000 nitsHonor 200 Pro offers significantly higher peak brightness, ensuring excellent outdoor visibility even in direct sunlight.
Resolution1220x27121224x2700Virtually identical pixel density, resulting in sharp visuals on both.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)Honor 200 Pro has a significantly more powerful processor, leading to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Honor's superior CPU architecture provides a substantial performance advantage.
GPUAdreno 710Adreno 735Honor 200 Pro's more powerful GPU delivers superior graphics performance for demanding games and applications.
RAM/Storage256GB/12GB, 512GB/12GB512GB/12GBBoth offer ample RAM and storage for most users. Poco X6 offers a 256GB option for potentially lower cost.
Camera
Rear CameraNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare camera quality and features.
Video4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@30/60fps (EIS)4K@30fps (OIS, EIS), 1080p@30/60fps (OIS, EIS)Honor 200 Pro benefits from Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for smoother and more stable video recording.
Battery
Capacity5100 mAh5200 mAhNegligible difference in battery capacity. Real-world battery life depends on optimization and usage patterns.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X6 Advantages:

  • Lighter and Potentially Cheaper: Offers a more comfortable in-hand feel and a potential lower price point with the 256GB storage option.

Honor 200 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly More Powerful: The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 provides a major performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Brighter Display: Excellent outdoor visibility thanks to the 4000 nits peak brightness.
  • More Stable Video: OIS ensures smoother video recording.
  • Newer OS with Longer Support: Ships with Android 14 and likely longer software updates.

Trade-offs:

  • Performance vs. Price: Honor 200 Pro's superior performance comes at a likely higher price and potentially heavier build.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X6: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize a lightweight phone for everyday tasks like web browsing, social media, and casual gaming.

Honor 200 Pro: Ideal for power users and mobile gamers who demand top-tier performance, a bright display, and excellent video recording capabilities.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco X6 likely offers better value if price is a primary concern.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For demanding tasks and gaming, the Honor 200 Pro is the clear winner.
  3. Do you prioritize a lightweight phone? The Poco X6's lighter weight might be crucial for some users.

My Choice: Honor 200 Pro

While lacking complete camera specifications makes a fully informed decision challenging, the Honor 200 Pro is my choice. The significant performance advantage offered by the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, coupled with the exceptionally bright display and OIS for video recording, outweighs the slightly heavier build and potential price difference. As a power user who values smooth performance and a future-proof device with longer software support (implied by the newer Android version), the Honor 200 Pro aligns better with my needs. The brighter screen is a significant advantage for outdoor use. While the Poco X6 offers appealing aspects like its lighter weight, my priority lies in long-term performance and a premium user experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.