Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 12, 2024 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 98.98 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.59 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 186 g 189 g
Height 160.5 mm 164.1 mm
Width 74.3 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Yellow
  • Gray
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1220 x 2712 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.1 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 446 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1800 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.52 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali G615-MC6 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco X6 ProZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mmPoco X6 Pro is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight186g189gNegligible weight difference.
Fingerprint SensorUnder displaySide-mountedPreference-based; under-display is often perceived as more modern.
Display
Size6.67"6.6"Minimal size difference.
TypeAMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby VisionIPS LCD, 90HzPoco X6 Pro offers significantly better contrast, wider color gamut, smoother scrolling, and HDR support resulting in a superior visual experience.
Resolution1220 x 2712720 x 1612Poco X6 Pro has much sharper and more detailed visuals due to significantly higher resolution.
Peak Brightness1800 nitsNot specifiedPoco X6 Pro's high peak brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility. Lack of data for the ZTE phone prevents direct comparison.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Poco X6 Pro boasts significantly superior processing power and efficiency due to a more advanced chipset and manufacturing process.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Poco X6 Pro offers much faster and more responsive performance across demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUMali G615-MC6Mali-G57 MP1Poco X6 Pro will handle graphically intensive tasks and gaming considerably better.
RAM12GB/8GB4GBPoco X6 Pro offers significantly more RAM enabling smoother multitasking and better handling of demanding applications.
Storage512GB/256GB256GBPoco X6 Pro offers a higher storage option.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity. Real-world battery life will depend on usage and optimization.
Camera
Video4K@30fps (EIS)1080p@30fpsPoco X6 Pro offers higher video resolution and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother footage.
Other
OSAndroid 14Android 13Poco X6 Pro comes with a newer Android version, potentially offering more features and longer software support.
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly superior performance: The Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset and ample RAM offer a vastly more powerful and responsive experience compared to the ZTE Blade A75 4G.
  • Much better display: The AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision provides vibrant colors, deep blacks, smooth scrolling, and exceptional clarity.
  • Higher resolution: Sharper and more detailed visuals for media consumption and gaming.
  • More storage options: Offers a 512GB option for users needing ample storage.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Lower price: Expected given the specifications. This is the key differentiator.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro: Users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and a smooth user experience. Ideal for gaming, media consumption, multitasking, and demanding applications.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Budget-conscious users who primarily need a basic smartphone for communication, web browsing, and light tasks. Not recommended for demanding applications or users who prioritize performance or display quality.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The ZTE Blade A75 4G is significantly more affordable.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For demanding tasks, the Poco X6 Pro is essential. For basic use, the ZTE might suffice.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The Poco X6 Pro vastly outperforms the ZTE in these areas.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro

The Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is my clear choice. While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers a budget-friendly option, the Poco X6 Pro provides a significantly superior user experience in almost every aspect. The vastly improved performance, stunning AMOLED display, and higher resolution make it worth the extra investment for a device that will likely remain smooth and enjoyable to use for a longer period. The difference in chipset, RAM, and display quality alone makes the Poco X6 Pro a much more future-proof device. While I don't know the exact price difference, unless the ZTE is drastically cheaper, the Poco X6 Pro offers far more value.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.