Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro vs Honor Magic V3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 12, 2024 July 19, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 98.98 cm³ 98.98 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.59 "/g 3.5 "/g
Weight 186 g 226 g
Height 160.5 mm 156.6 mm
Width 74.3 mm 145.3 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 4.35 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Yellow
  • Gray
  • Red
  • Snow
  • Velvet Black
  • Tundra Green

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 7.92 "
Resolution 1220 x 2712 2156 x 2344
Aspect Ratio 20:9 16:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.1 % 88.6 %
Pixel Density 446 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1800 nits 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 82.10 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.52 mAh/cm³ 52.03 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5150 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali G615-MC6 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro and the Honor Magic V3. Instead of just listing specs, we'll explore how these features translate into real-world experiences for different users.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureXiaomi Poco X6 ProHonor Magic V3User Experience Impact
Form FactorTraditional Slab PhoneFoldable SmartphoneThe Magic V3's foldability offers versatility in screen size, transitioning from pocket-sized to tablet-like. The Poco X6 Pro prioritizes portability.
Display6.67" AMOLED, 120Hz, 1800 nits peak brightness7.92" Foldable AMOLED, 120Hz, 1800 nits peak brightnessThe Magic V3 boasts a larger, more immersive display for multimedia consumption but introduces a crease and potential durability concerns. The Poco X6 Pro provides a bright, vibrant experience in a more robust form.
Interface DesignMIUI 15 (Android 14)MagicOS 7.2 (Android 14)Both offer customizable Android experiences. Specific UI elements and software features will impact individual preferences.
Interaction FlowStandard touch-based navigationTouch-based with foldable screen optimizationsThe Magic V3's software likely includes features tailored for multitasking and split-screen utilization leveraging the folding capability. The Poco X6 Pro will likely offer a more traditional smartphone experience.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android Accessibility SuiteStandard Android Accessibility Suite with potential foldable specific featuresBoth devices likely offer similar base accessibility features. The Magic V3 may have unique options related to its foldable design, but this needs further investigation.
Design ErgonomicsLightweight (186g), slim profileHeavier (226g), thicker when foldedThe Poco X6 Pro is designed for comfortable one-handed use. The Magic V3 sacrifices some portability for its larger, foldable screen.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: On-the-Go Productivity: Imagine a busy professional needing to review a document and respond to emails while commuting. The Poco X6 Pro's lighter weight and traditional form factor make it easily manageable on a crowded train. The Magic V3, unfolded, provides a larger screen for comfortable document editing but requires two hands and might be less practical in tight spaces.

Scenario: Immersive Entertainment: Picture yourself watching a movie. The Magic V3's expansive foldable screen transforms into a portable cinema, offering a more immersive experience. The Poco X6 Pro's vibrant AMOLED display still provides excellent visuals but on a smaller scale.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For users prioritizing portability and one-handed usability, the Poco X6 Pro is a strong contender. Individuals who value a large screen for multimedia and multitasking might prefer the Magic V3, accepting the trade-offs in portability and potential durability. Users with specific accessibility needs require a deeper dive into each device's software features to determine the best fit.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The choice hinges on your priorities:

  • Portability and ease of use: Poco X6 Pro
  • Large screen and multitasking: Honor Magic V3

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro. While the Honor Magic V3's folding technology is fascinating, the Poco X6 Pro better aligns with my emphasis on user-centered design for everyday usability. Its lighter weight, comfortable one-handed operation, and vibrant display create a seamless and enjoyable mobile experience for a broader range of users. I believe that for most individuals, the practical benefits of the Poco X6 Pro outweigh the novelty of a foldable screen, especially considering the price difference. The Magic V3 introduces potential compromises in portability and durability that might detract from the overall user experience for many. The Poco X6 Pro strikes a better balance between performance, design, and everyday practicality.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.