Xiaomi Poco X5 vs ZTE Blade V60 Design - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 7, 2023 June 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 101.13 cm³ 106.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 189 g 198 g
Height 165.9 mm 164.2 mm
Width 76.2 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Jaguar Black
  • Wildcat Blue
  • Supernova Green
  • Champagne Gold
  • Dark Blue
  • Sunrise Violet

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 700 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.44 mAh/cm³ 47.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco X5ZTE Blade V60 DesignPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.9 x 76.2 x 8164.2 x 75.3 x 8.6Poco X5 is slightly thinner.
Weight (g)189198Poco X5 is slightly lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDIPS LCDPoco X5 offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency in dark mode due to AMOLED technology.
Display Size (inches)6.676.6Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1612Poco X5 has a significantly sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090Poco X5 provides smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the overall user experience.
Pixel Density (PPI)395267Poco X5's higher PPI translates to a noticeably sharper and more detailed display.
Peak Brightness (nits)1200Not specifiedPoco X5's high peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. ZTE's unspecified brightness limits comparison.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5GUnisoc T606Poco X5 offers better performance and 5G connectivity.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz & 6x1.7 GHz)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz & 6x1.6 GHz)Poco X5 has faster clock speeds, leading to improved performance in demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G57 MP1Poco X5's GPU provides a smoother gaming experience and better graphics performance overall.
RAM (GB)6/84/6More RAM in some Poco X5 versions allows for better multitasking and smoother performance.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850While ZTE has a higher megapixel count, sensor quality and image processing are crucial and cannot be compared with the given information.
Front Camera (MP)138Poco X5's higher resolution front camera potentially delivers better selfie quality.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth offer basic video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both have the same battery capacity.
Fast Charging33W22.5WPoco X5 supports faster charging, reducing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X5 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology, higher resolution, faster refresh rate, and higher peak brightness provide a significantly better visual experience.
  • Better Performance: A more powerful chipset, CPU, and GPU translate to smoother overall performance, better multitasking, and improved gaming capabilities.
  • Faster Charging: 33W fast charging significantly reduces charging time compared to the ZTE's 22.5W.

ZTE Blade V60 Design Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Positioned in the low price range, it offers a more budget-friendly option.

Trade-offs:

  • The ZTE Blade V60 Design sacrifices display quality, performance, and charging speed for affordability.
  • The Xiaomi Poco X5 comes at a higher price but offers a considerably better overall user experience.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X5: Suited for users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and a smooth user experience. Ideal for gaming, media consumption, and multitasking.

ZTE Blade V60 Design: Best suited for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light web browsing. Suitable for users who prioritize affordability over performance and features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The ZTE is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For demanding tasks, the Poco X5 is superior. For basic usage, the ZTE might suffice.
  3. How important is display quality to you? The Poco X5's AMOLED display is a major advantage.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Usage: ZTE Blade V60 Design
  • Balanced Budget, Moderate Usage: Xiaomi Poco X5
  • Performance and Display Enthusiast: Xiaomi Poco X5

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco X5

While the ZTE Blade V60 Design offers an enticing price point, the Xiaomi Poco X5's superior display, performance, and faster charging make it the clear winner for me. The difference in user experience offered by the AMOLED display and the more powerful processor would significantly impact my daily usage. I am willing to invest in the higher price for the long-term benefits of a smoother and more enjoyable smartphone experience. The faster refresh rate and charging speed are also significant factors in my decision. Ultimately, the Poco X5 offers better value for its price in terms of overall user experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.