Xiaomi Poco X5 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 7, 2023 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 101.13 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 189 g 222 g
Height 165.9 mm 162.3 mm
Width 76.2 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 8 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Jaguar Black
  • Wildcat Blue
  • Supernova Green
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 700 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.44 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco X5Samsung Galaxy M35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.9 x 76.2 x 8162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1Poco X5 is slightly taller and thinner, M35 is slightly wider and thicker. Negligible difference in everyday use.
Weight (g)189222Poco X5 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.676.6Negligible size difference.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness.
TypeAMOLED, 120HzAMOLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors due to AMOLED and 120Hz refresh rate.
Peak Brightness (nits)1200Not specifiedPoco X5's higher peak brightness (if confirmed) ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. Missing M35 peak brightness limits comparison.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)Exynos 1380 generally offers better performance and efficiency due to its newer architecture and smaller node size.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)M35 likely has a performance advantage with faster prime cores.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G68 MP5Mali-G68 MP5 generally provides superior graphics performance for demanding games and applications.
RAM (GB)6/86/8Both offer sufficient RAM for multitasking, but 8GB variants provide more headroom for future-proofing.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850M35 has a slightly higher resolution main sensor.
FeaturesNight Mode 2.0OIS, Ultra stable video, Night Mode, DOL HDR, 4K@30fps with EISM35 offers Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for significantly improved video and low-light photos. It also offers superior video recording capabilities (4K@30fps with EIS).
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50006000M35 boasts significantly longer battery life.
Fast Charging (W)3325Poco X5 charges faster despite smaller battery capacity.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X5 Advantages:

  • Lighter weight for comfortable handling.
  • Faster charging speeds.
  • Potentially higher peak display brightness (needs confirmation for M35).

Samsung Galaxy M35 Advantages:

  • Significantly longer battery life.
  • More powerful processor and GPU, leading to smoother performance and better gaming.
  • Superior camera features, including OIS for stable video and better low-light performance, and higher resolution video recording capabilities.
  • Newer Bluetooth version (5.3 vs 5.1) and Wifi Version (Wifi 6 vs Wifi 5) enabling faster data transfer speeds and more stable connections.
  • More recent OS version (Android 14 vs Android 12), offering potential feature and security updates for a longer duration.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X5: Users prioritizing affordability, lighter weight, and faster charging. Suitable for casual users, light gaming, and social media.

Samsung Galaxy M35: Users who value long battery life, strong performance for demanding tasks and gaming, and a superior camera experience, especially video recording.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? Both are mid-range but slight price variations may exist.
  2. What is your primary usage? Gaming and demanding tasks favor the M35, while casual usage might suffice with the Poco X5.
  3. How important is battery life and camera quality? The M35 significantly excels in these areas.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M35

While the Poco X5 offers faster charging and a lighter design, the Samsung Galaxy M35 provides a more well-rounded package. The significantly longer battery life, superior performance from the Exynos 1380, the inclusion of OIS for the camera, and the more up-to-date Android version make it a more compelling choice for long-term use. The advantages of the M35 outweigh the minor benefits of the Poco X5 for my needs. I prioritize performance, battery life, and camera quality over marginally faster charging and a slightly lighter build.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.