Xiaomi Poco X5 vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 7, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 101.13 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 189 g 213 g
Height 165.9 mm 161.1 mm
Width 76.2 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Jaguar Black
  • Wildcat Blue
  • Supernova Green
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 700 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.44 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco X5Samsung Galaxy A55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.9 x 76.2 x 8161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2A55 slightly shorter and wider, negligible difference in thickness.
Weight (g)189213Poco X5 noticeably lighter (24g), impacting one-handed use and pocket comfort.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and materials unknown, limiting comparison.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDSuper AMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. A55 boasts HDR10+ for better dynamic range in supported content.
Size (inches)6.676.6Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)1200Not specifiedPoco X5's higher peak brightness improves outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5G (6nm)Exynos 1480 (4nm)A55's newer 4nm process likely translates to better power efficiency. Exynos 1480 should offer better CPU performance due to faster clock speeds and newer core architecture.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A55's CPU configuration suggests significantly better performance in demanding tasks.
GPUAdreno 619Xclipse 530A55 likely has a performance advantage in graphics-intensive tasks and gaming.
RAM6GB (reviewed model)8GB (reviewed model)A55 offers more RAM in the reviewed configuration, enabling better multitasking. Both phones offer other RAM configurations.
OSAndroid 12Android 14A55 comes with a newer OS version, offering potential feature and security advantages and longer software support lifespan. Poco X5 may receive updates to newer Android versions.
Camera
Rear Camera48MP Main, 8MP Wide, 2MP Macro50MP Main (OIS), 13MP Wide, 5MP MacroA55's main camera features Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for sharper images and videos, especially in low light. Higher resolution macro lens on A55. Better sensor on A55 main camera.
Front Camera13MP32MPA55 has a significantly higher resolution front camera.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps with EISA55 offers significantly better video recording capabilities with higher resolution and electronic image stabilization.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity.
Fast Charging33W25WPoco X5 offers faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X5 Advantages:

  • Lighter: More comfortable for extended use and one-handed operation.
  • Faster Charging: Less downtime spent plugged in.
  • Potentially Lower Price: Depending on specific configurations and market.

Samsung Galaxy A55 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Newer and more powerful chipset for smoother multitasking and gaming.
  • Better Camera System: OIS on the main camera, higher resolution sensors, 4K video recording.
  • Newer Software: Android 14 with longer potential software update support.
  • More RAM: In the reviewed model, better for multitasking.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X5: Budget-conscious users prioritizing lightweight design and fast charging. Suitable for everyday tasks, social media, and light gaming.

Samsung Galaxy A55: Users looking for a well-rounded phone with a good camera, strong performance, and longer software support. Suitable for demanding tasks, gaming, and mobile photography/videography.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco X5 is likely more affordable.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming and photography/videography benefit from the A55's superior performance and camera.
  3. How important is software longevity? The A55, with newer Android version and longer expected support, wins here.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A55

While the Poco X5 offers a lighter design and faster charging, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is the better overall phone for me. The significantly improved performance, superior camera system with OIS, newer Android version with longer update support, and more RAM in the reviewed version outweigh the Poco X5's advantages. I prioritize a smooth user experience, future-proofing through software updates, and the ability to capture high-quality photos and videos. The slightly higher price and slower charging are acceptable trade-offs for these significant benefits. The A55 offers a more well-rounded package that caters to a broader range of users and usage scenarios.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.