Xiaomi Poco X5 vs Samsung Galaxy A34 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 7, 2023 March 24, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 101.13 cm³ 103.3 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.32 "/g
Weight 189 g 199 g
Height 165.9 mm 161.3 mm
Width 76.2 mm 78.1 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Jaguar Black
  • Wildcat Blue
  • Supernova Green
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 700 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.44 mAh/cm³ 48.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco X5Samsung Galaxy A34Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.9 x 76.2 x 8161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2Poco X5 is slightly taller and narrower, A34 slightly thicker. Negligible difference in everyday use.
Weight (g)189199Poco X5 is slightly lighter, but the difference (10g) is minimal.
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedUnder-displayPreference-based. Side-mounted can be faster, under-display feels more modern.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.676.6Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Display TypeAMOLEDSuper AMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. Samsung's implementation often boasts slightly better color accuracy and brightness. Missing peak brightness for A34 limits direct comparison.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5GMediaTek Dimensity 1080Both mid-range chipsets offer good performance for everyday tasks. Dimensity 1080 may have a slight edge in benchmarks, but real-world difference might be minimal.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz & 6x1.7 GHz)Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz & 6x2.0 GHz)A34 has higher clock speeds, potentially leading to slightly faster app loading and multitasking.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G68 MC4Mali-G68 generally performs better in graphics-intensive tasks like gaming.
RAM6GB6GBEqual RAM capacity for multitasking.
OSAndroid 12Android 13A34 ships with a newer Android version, offering potential feature and security advantages. Missing max OS version for Poco X5 makes long term support comparison difficult.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4848Similar resolution. Sensor details missing for Poco X5 prevent in-depth comparison. A34 utilizes a known Sony sensor with OIS.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsA34 offers significantly better video resolution.
Camera FeaturesOptical Image Stabilization (OIS)OIS on the A34 significantly improves low-light photography and video stability.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity.
Fast Charging (W)3325Poco X5 charges faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X5 Advantages:

  • Faster Charging: 33W vs 25W on the A34.
  • Slightly Lighter: Though the difference is minor.

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Better GPU: Mali-G68 MC4 generally offers superior graphics performance.
  • Newer OS: Ships with Android 13 with guaranteed updates to Android 17, offering longer software support and newer features.
  • Optical Image Stabilization (OIS): Crucial for sharper images, especially in low light and for video stability.
  • 4K Video Recording: A significant advantage over 1080p on the Poco X5.
  • Potentially Better Main Camera Sensor: Utilizing the Sony IMX582. More detail provided allows for better analysis compared to the Poco X5.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X5: Users prioritizing fast charging and seeking a slightly lighter phone with a good price-to-performance ratio. Suitable for general use, social media, and light gaming.

Samsung Galaxy A34: Users who value software updates, camera quality (especially video), and smoother gaming performance. Better for content creation, mobile photography, and more demanding games.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is camera quality, especially video recording? A34 is significantly better in this area.
  2. How important are long-term software updates and a newer Android version? A34 wins with guaranteed updates to Android 17.
  3. Is gaming performance a priority? A34 offers a better GPU for smoother gaming.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Casual User: Either phone is suitable, but the Poco X5 might offer better value if budget is a concern.
  • Photographer/Videographer: The A34 is the clear choice due to OIS and 4K video recording.
  • Mobile Gamer: A34 offers a better gaming experience thanks to its superior GPU.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A34

While the Poco X5 offers faster charging and a slightly lower price, the Samsung Galaxy A34's advantages in key areas like camera quality (OIS and 4K video), software support (longer updates and Android 13), and gaming performance (better GPU) make it a more compelling overall package for me. The guaranteed software updates alone provide significant long-term value and peace of mind. These features outweigh the marginal benefits of the Poco X5 in my personal use case.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.