Xiaomi Poco X5 vs Realme C67 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C67
Realme C67
Realme

General

Launch Date February 7, 2023 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 101.13 cm³ 99.49 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.54 "/g
Weight 189 g 190 g
Height 165.9 mm 165.7 mm
Width 76.2 mm 76 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Jaguar Black
  • Wildcat Blue
  • Supernova Green
  • Sunny Oasis
  • Dark Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.72 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85 % 86.6 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 392 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 550 nits
HBM Brightness 700 nits 680 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 110.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.44 mAh/cm³ 50.26 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco X5Realme C67Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.9 x 76.2 x 8165.7 x 76 x 7.9Virtually identical in size and feel
Weight (g)189190Negligible weight difference
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDIPS LCDPoco X5 will offer more vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency in dark mode. Realme C67 might be slightly more visible in direct sunlight.
Display Size (inches)6.676.72Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Identical resolution, sharpness will be similar.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)1200680Poco X5 will be significantly brighter outdoors.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5GDimensity 6100+Both offer similar mid-range performance, but benchmarks would be needed for definitive comparison. Dimensity 6100+ may have a slight edge in CPU performance while the Snapdragon 695 may have better GPU performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Similar performance, day-to-day tasks should be handled well by both.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G57 MC2Gaming performance might vary, detailed comparison requires GPU benchmarks.
RAM6GB (Reviewed Variant)6GB (Reviewed Variant)Similar multitasking capabilities in the reviewed variants. Realme C67 offers configurations with up to 12GB RAM, which would provide a significant advantage in heavy multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.8108MP, f/1.75Realme C67 boasts higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail. Poco X5's actual image quality depends on sensor and processing.
Ultrawide8MP, f/2.2Not specifiedPoco X5 offers ultrawide photography for broader perspectives.
Macro2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Similar macro capabilities, likely for close-up shots but with limited detail.
Selfie13MP, f/2.458MP, f/2.0Poco X5 has a higher resolution front camera.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity, expected similar battery life.
Fast Charging33W33WBoth offer equally fast charging speeds.
OtherNFCNo NFCPoco X5 enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X5 Advantages:

  • AMOLED Display: Superior contrast, colors, and power efficiency.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments.
  • Ultrawide Camera: Offers a wider field of view for photography.

Realme C67 Advantages:

  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: Potentially captures more detail (dependent on sensor quality and image processing).
  • Potentially Higher CPU Performance: Dimensity 6100+ may offer a slight edge in processing power for demanding tasks.
  • Higher RAM Configurations Available: Offers options with up to 12GB RAM for superior multitasking, although not in the reviewed variant.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X5: Suitable for users who prioritize display quality, NFC functionality, and occasional ultrawide photography. Ideal for media consumption, mobile gaming, and contactless transactions.

Realme C67: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize a high-resolution main camera and potentially higher CPU performance for demanding applications. Users who need extensive multitasking should consider the 12GB RAM variant.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is display quality a top priority? If yes, the AMOLED display of the Poco X5 is a significant advantage.
  2. Do you require NFC for contactless payments? If yes, the Poco X5 is the only option.
  3. Is a higher resolution main camera crucial, or is overall camera versatility more important? Realme C67 offers a 108MP main camera, but Poco X5 provides an ultrawide lens.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco X5

While the Realme C67 boasts a higher resolution main camera, the Xiaomi Poco X5 offers a more well-rounded package for my needs. The AMOLED display is a major differentiator, providing a significantly better visual experience. NFC is essential for my daily use of contactless payments. The inclusion of an ultrawide camera adds versatility to photography. Although the Realme C67 might offer slightly better raw performance in some areas, the Poco X5's combination of features and the superior display makes it the more compelling choice for me. The price difference, while present, is justified by the significant advantages the Poco X5 provides.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.