Xiaomi Poco X5 vs Nothing Phone (2a) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 7, 2023 March 12, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 101.13 cm³ 106.1 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.53 "/g
Weight 189 g 190 g
Height 165.9 mm 161.7 mm
Width 76.2 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Jaguar Black
  • Wildcat Blue
  • Supernova Green
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Milk

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85 % 87.6 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 700 nits
HBM Brightness 700 nits 1100 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.44 mAh/cm³ 47.12 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Pro (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G610 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco X5Nothing Phone (2a)Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)165.9 x 76.2 x 8161.7 x 76.3 x 8.6Nothing Phone (2a) is slightly shorter and thicker. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)189190Virtually identical weight.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.676.7Negligible size difference.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2412Almost identical resolution, resulting in similar sharpness.
Panel TypeAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)12001300Nothing Phone (2a) might be slightly more visible in direct sunlight.
HDRNo Dolby Vision specified for Poco X5, HDR10+ for Nothing PhoneHDR10+Nothing Phone (2a) offers better dynamic range and color accuracy in HDR content.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 (6nm)Dimensity 7200 Pro (4nm)Nothing Phone (2a) has a significantly more powerful and efficient processor. Expect smoother performance, especially in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 Cortex-A510)Nothing Phone (2a)'s CPU architecture and higher clock speeds provide a noticeable performance advantage.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G610 MC4Nothing Phone (2a)'s GPU is more capable for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM6GB8GB/12GBNothing Phone (2a) offers more RAM in its configurations, enabling better multitasking and app performance.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850While megapixels aren't everything, Nothing Phone (2a) likely offers slightly better detail. More significant is the sensor size and features.
Ultrawide (MP)850Nothing Phone's vastly superior ultrawide offers significantly better image quality and detail.
Optical StabilizationNoYesNothing Phone (2a)'s optical stabilization results in significantly smoother videos and better low-light photos.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@120fpsNothing Phone (2a) offers significantly better video recording capabilities with higher resolution and frame rates.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity.
Fast Charging (W)3345Nothing Phone (2a) charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X5 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: While not confirmed, based on historical data and specifications, the Poco X5 is likely more affordable.

Nothing Phone (2a) Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: The Dimensity 7200 Pro and more RAM offer a major performance advantage for demanding tasks, multitasking, and gaming.
  • Superior Camera System: Larger sensors, optical stabilization, and higher resolution video recording capabilities make the Nothing Phone (2a)'s camera system far superior.
  • Faster Charging: 45W charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the Poco X5's 33W charging.
  • More Up-to-date Software: Launching with Android 14 and guaranteed updates to Android 17 provides a longer software support lifespan.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X5: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality, casual gaming, and everyday social media use.

Nothing Phone (2a): Users who demand smoother performance for demanding apps and gaming, prioritize a high-quality camera experience (especially video recording), and value longer software updates.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco X5 is likely more affordable.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For demanding tasks and gaming, the Nothing Phone (2a) is vastly superior. For basic usage, the Poco X5 might suffice.
  3. How important is camera quality? The Nothing Phone (2a) offers a substantially better camera experience.

My Choice: Nothing Phone (2a)

The Nothing Phone (2a), despite potentially being more expensive, offers significantly better value due to its vastly superior performance, camera system, and longer software support. The faster charging is a welcome bonus. While the Poco X5 might be suitable for budget-conscious users with basic needs, the Nothing Phone (2a)'s advantages in crucial areas like performance and camera make it a much more compelling device for a broader range of users. The future-proofing provided by the newer OS and promised updates is also a strong factor in its favor.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.