Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro vs Tecno Spark 10 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 7, 2023 April 7, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 97.81 cm³ 104.26 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g N/A
Weight 181 g 0 g
Height 162.9 mm 164.4 mm
Width 76 mm 75.5 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Poco Yellow
  • Horizon Blue
  • Astral Black
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.8 % 84.3 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 900 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.12 mAh/cm³ 47.96 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 642L Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco X5 ProTecno Spark 10 5GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.9 x 76 x 7.9164.4 x 75.5 x 8.4Poco X5 Pro is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)1810 (Missing data)Cannot compare weight without Spark 10 5G's weight.
Build(Missing data)(Missing data)Build materials impact durability and premium feel; information is lacking for both.
Display
Display Type6.67" AMOLED, 120Hz6.6" IPS LCD, 90HzPoco X5 Pro offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling due to AMOLED and higher refresh rate. Spark 10 5G's LCD might be slightly better in direct sunlight.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1612Significantly sharper and more detailed visuals on the Poco X5 Pro.
PPI395267Noticeably crisper text and images on the Poco X5 Pro.
HDRHDR10+, Dolby VisionNone specifiedPoco X5 Pro supports HDR content for a wider dynamic range and more vibrant visuals.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 778G 5G (6nm)Dimensity 6020 (7nm)Poco X5 Pro likely offers better performance and efficiency due to a more powerful chipset.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz A78 & 3x2.2 GHz A78 & 4x1.9 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz A76 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)While both have similar core configurations, the Snapdragon 778G in the Poco X5 Pro is generally considered more powerful.
GPUAdreno 642LMali-G57 MC2Poco X5 Pro should provide a smoother gaming and graphics-intensive app experience.
RAM6GB/8GB8GBBoth offer ample RAM for multitasking, though specific variants need consideration.
Camera
Main Camera108MP, f/1.950MP, f/1.6Poco X5 Pro boasts higher resolution for potentially more detailed photos, while Spark 10 5G has a wider aperture for better low-light performance. Practical results depend on sensor quality and image processing, which are not fully detailed.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps1080p@30fpsPoco X5 Pro offers significantly better video recording capabilities with higher resolution and frame rates.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life, though actual usage will vary.
Charging67W Fast Charging18W Fast ChargingPoco X5 Pro charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate provides a smoother, more vibrant, and responsive visual experience.
  • Stronger Performance: Snapdragon 778G chipset offers noticeably better performance for gaming and demanding tasks.
  • Faster Charging: 67W fast charging significantly reduces downtime.
  • Higher Resolution Camera: 108MP main camera and 4K video recording capabilities provide more detailed photos and videos.

Tecno Spark 10 5G Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Pricing information suggests the Spark 10 5G might be more budget-friendly. (More detailed price comparison needed.)
  • Latest Android Version: Ships with Android 13 out-of-the-box.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro: Suitable for users who prioritize performance, display quality, and fast charging. Ideal for gamers, multimedia enthusiasts, and those who want a smooth and responsive overall experience.

Tecno Spark 10 5G: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and the latest Android version. Good for casual users focused on communication, social media, and light tasks.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco X5 Pro likely commands a higher price.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming, multimedia consumption, or basic communication?
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The Poco X5 Pro significantly outperforms the Spark 10 5G in these areas.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro

Reasoning: The Poco X5 Pro offers a significantly better user experience due to its superior display, performance, faster charging, and more capable camera. While the Tecno Spark 10 5G might be more affordable, the Poco X5 Pro's advantages in key areas like display and performance are crucial for a satisfying smartphone experience in the long run. The higher resolution and refresh rate alone make a huge difference in daily usage. I am willing to invest more for the significant upgrade in overall quality and features. The lack of weight information for the Spark 10 5G also hinders a complete comparison.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.