Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro vs Apple iPhone 16 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 7, 2023 September 20, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 97.81 cm³ 82.43 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.69 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 181 g 170 g
Height 162.9 mm 147.6 mm
Width 76 mm 71.6 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Poco Yellow
  • Horizon Blue
  • Astral Black
  • Black
  • White
  • Pink
  • Teal
  • Ultramarine

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.1 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1179 x 2556
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.8 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness 500 nits 1000 nits
HBM Brightness 900 nits 2000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 95.70 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.12 mAh/cm³ 43.2 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3561 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) Apple A18 (3 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) Hexa-core (2x4.04 GHz + 4x2.20 GHz)
GPU Adreno 642L Apple GPU (5-core graphics)

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, DisplayPort

Software

Operating System Android iOS
Initial OS Version 12 18
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco X5 ProApple iPhone 16Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.9 x 76 x 7.9147.6 x 71.6 x 7.8iPhone 16 is noticeably smaller and potentially easier to handle one-handed.
Weight (g)181170iPhone 16 is lighter, contributing to better one-handed use.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without material information.
Display
Display TypeAMOLEDOLEDBoth offer excellent contrast and vibrant colors, but specific panel quality can't be determined without further details.
Display Size (inches)6.676.1Poco X5 Pro offers a larger screen for media consumption, while iPhone 16's smaller size might be preferred for one-handed use.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001179 x 2556iPhone 16 has a sharper display (460 ppi vs 395 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120Not specifiedPoco X5 Pro's 120Hz display provides smoother scrolling and animations. iPhone 16's refresh rate is unknown, hindering a complete comparison.
Peak Brightness (nits)900 (HBM)2000 (HBM)iPhone 16 boasts significantly higher peak brightness, ensuring better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm)Apple A18 (3 nm)A18 is expected to be significantly more powerful in CPU and GPU performance based on Apple's historical chip advancements and the newer 3nm manufacturing process.
CPUOcta-coreHexa-coreCore count alone doesn't determine performance; A18's architecture and clock speeds likely give it a significant edge.
GPUAdreno 642LApple GPU (5-core)A18's GPU is likely more powerful, enabling smoother gaming and demanding graphics tasks. Specific benchmarks are needed for definitive comparison.
RAM (GB)6/88Both offer sufficient RAM for most tasks, but some demanding applications might benefit from the additional RAM in the higher end Poco configuration.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)10848Higher megapixel count on Poco X5 Pro doesn't guarantee better image quality. iPhone's sensor size, processing, and aperture play a crucial role.
Ultrawide (MP)812iPhone 16's ultrawide has a higher resolution and a potentially wider field of view (specification missing for Poco X5 Pro).
Selfie Camera (MP)1612Poco X5 Pro has a higher resolution selfie camera, but image quality depends on various factors beyond megapixels.
Video Recording4K@30fps with EIS4K@60fps with HDR, Stereo SoundiPhone 16 offers higher resolution and frame rate video recording with HDR and stereo sound, likely resulting in superior video quality.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50003561Poco X5 Pro has a significantly larger battery, potentially leading to longer battery life.
Fast Charging (W)6725Poco X5 Pro supports much faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: Significantly longer potential battery life.
  • Faster Charging: Reduced charging time.
  • Larger Display: More immersive media consumption.
  • Higher Refresh Rate: Smoother scrolling and animations.
  • Lower Price: Generally more affordable.

Apple iPhone 16 Advantages:

  • More Powerful Processor and GPU: Superior performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Sharper Display: Crisper text and images due to higher pixel density.
  • Higher Peak Brightness: Better outdoor visibility.
  • Superior Video Recording Capabilities: Higher resolution, frame rate, HDR and stereo sound.
  • Potentially Better Camera System: While megapixels are lower, Apple's image processing and sensor technology often result in better overall quality. Requires real world comparison to confirm.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life, a large display, and smooth performance for everyday tasks. Excellent for media consumption, social media, and casual gaming.

Apple iPhone 16: Ideal for users who demand top-tier performance, a premium user experience, and excellent camera and video capabilities. Suitable for demanding tasks, mobile gaming, content creation, and users heavily invested in the Apple ecosystem.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco X5 Pro offers excellent value for its price, while the iPhone 16 commands a premium.
  2. What are your performance needs? For demanding tasks and gaming, the iPhone 16's A18 chip provides a significant advantage.
  3. Which operating system do you prefer? Android offers more customization options, while iOS is known for its simplicity and user-friendliness.

My Choice: Apple iPhone 16

While the Poco X5 Pro offers compelling value with its larger battery and faster charging, the iPhone 16's superior performance, sharper display, brighter screen, and expected overall camera quality make it the more appealing device for me. I prioritize a smooth and powerful user experience, and the A18 chip's expected performance leap, combined with iOS optimizations, aligns better with my needs. Additionally, the improved video recording capabilities are a significant factor. While the smaller battery is a trade-off, I'm willing to compromise for the overall performance and user experience gains. This decision reflects my personal preferences and priorities; individual needs may vary.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.