Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 23, 2022 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 101.21 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.25 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 205 g 189 g
Height 164.2 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.1 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Poco Yellow
  • Laser Black
  • Laser Blue
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 700 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.4 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

The Tale of Two Phones: Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G

Let's embark on a journey to explore two distinct mobile experiences: the vibrant Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G and the pragmatic ZTE Blade A75 4G. Instead of drowning in a sea of specs, we'll uncover how these devices translate into real-world use, focusing on the stories they tell through their design and features.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureXiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5GZTE Blade A75 4GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignSuper AMOLED, 120Hz refresh rateIPS LCD, 90Hz refresh ratePoco X4 Pro offers richer colors, smoother scrolling, and better outdoor visibility.
Interaction FlowSnapdragon 695, 6/8GB RAMUnisoc T606, 4/8GB RAMPoco X4 Pro provides a more responsive and fluid experience, especially for demanding tasks and multitasking.
Accessibility FeaturesSide-mounted fingerprint sensor, NFCSide-mounted fingerprint sensor, NFCBoth offer convenient biometric security and contactless payment options.
Design Ergonomics8.1mm thin, 205g8.6mm thin, 189gBlade A75 is slightly lighter, but Poco X4 Pro's slimmer profile might feel more premium.
Display Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels (395 ppi)720 x 1612 pixels (267 ppi)Sharper and more detailed visuals on the Poco X4 Pro, enhancing media consumption and overall clarity.
Connectivity5G capable4G onlyPoco X4 Pro offers faster download/upload speeds and lower latency where 5G is available, future-proofing the device.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine you're a budding photographer capturing a vibrant street festival. The Poco X4 Pro's superior camera system, with its 108MP main sensor, allows you to capture stunningly detailed photos, even in challenging lighting conditions. Its AMOLED display brings your images to life with vivid colors and deep blacks, allowing you to relive the moment with breathtaking clarity. Meanwhile, the Blade A75, while capturing decent photos with its 50MP main sensor, might struggle in low light and its LCD screen won't offer the same visual punch.

Scenario: You're a busy professional relying on your phone for seamless multitasking. The Poco X4 Pro's powerful processor and higher RAM capacity enable effortless switching between apps, ensuring a smooth and productive workflow. The Blade A75, with its less powerful processor, might experience occasional lags when handling multiple tasks.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

Both phones cater to a broad audience with their fingerprint sensors and NFC capabilities. However, the Poco X4 Pro's superior performance and vibrant display make it a more compelling choice for users who prioritize a visually engaging and responsive experience, such as gamers, content creators, or heavy media consumers. The Blade A75, with its lower price point, focuses on providing essential functionality and caters to budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability and basic smartphone features.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Choosing between these phones depends on your individual needs and priorities. If you value a premium feel, a fluid user experience, future-proof connectivity (5G), and a captivating display for media consumption, the Poco X4 Pro is the clear winner. If budget is a primary concern and your usage is centered around basic communication and tasks, the Blade A75 offers a solid value proposition.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G

Why? As a technology communications specialist focused on user experience, I prioritize a device that offers a delightful and engaging interaction. The Poco X4 Pro's vibrant AMOLED display, smooth 120Hz refresh rate, and powerful performance create a truly immersive and responsive experience. While the Blade A75 offers excellent value, the Poco X4 Pro's superior design and features better align with my philosophy of technology enhancing, not hindering, the human experience. The future-proofing of 5G connectivity also ensures the device remains relevant for longer. Finally, the significantly better camera system on the Poco X4 Pro allows for richer content creation, which is essential in today's visually-driven world. The price difference is justifiable for the significant jump in quality and performance.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.