Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 23, 2022 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 101.21 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.25 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 205 g 222 g
Height 164.2 mm 162.3 mm
Width 76.1 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Poco Yellow
  • Laser Black
  • Laser Blue
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 700 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.4 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy M35: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the raw numbers. Let's delve into a narrative-driven analysis that prioritizes user experience.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeaturePoco X4 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy M35User Experience Impact
Interface DesignMIUI 13 (Android 11)One UI (Android 14)Samsung offers a potentially more updated and refined interface with newer Android features.
Interaction Flow120Hz AMOLED Display - Smooth scrolling/gaming120Hz AMOLED Display - Smooth scrolling/gamingBoth excel in providing fluid visual feedback, enhancing responsiveness and overall user satisfaction.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android 11 accessibility optionsEnhanced Android 14 accessibility optionsGalaxy M35 likely boasts improved accessibility features for users with diverse needs.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (205g)Heavier (222g), Larger Battery (6000mAh)Poco X4 Pro offers a lighter feel for extended use, while M35 prioritizes battery life over portability.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional who needs a phone for both work and leisure.

  • Poco X4 Pro 5G: The vibrant 120Hz AMOLED display brings presentations to life and ensures a smooth gaming experience during downtime. The lighter weight makes it comfortable for one-handed use during commutes. However, the older Android version might lack some of the latest productivity features.

  • Samsung Galaxy M35: The powerful Exynos 1380 processor coupled with 8GB RAM effortlessly handles multitasking, from video conferencing to photo editing. The massive 6000mAh battery ensures all-day power, eliminating battery anxiety. The newer One UI and Android 14 provide a polished user experience with enhanced privacy and customization options.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For a budget-conscious user: The Poco X4 Pro 5G offers excellent value with its impressive display and performance at a competitive price point.
  • For a power user: The Galaxy M35's robust processor, larger battery, and updated software cater to demanding tasks and prolonged usage.
  • For an accessibility-focused user: The Galaxy M35's newer Android version likely provides better accessibility features.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Beyond specifications, consider your priorities:

  • Prioritize portability and affordability: Poco X4 Pro 5G
  • Prioritize performance, battery life, and the latest software: Samsung Galaxy M35

My Choice: I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M35. While the Poco X4 Pro 5G offers a compelling package, the Galaxy M35's superior performance, longer battery life, newer software (both Android OS and One UI), and potentially enhanced accessibility features align better with my personal preferences for a device that can seamlessly handle demanding tasks and provide a future-proof user experience. The slightly heavier weight is a trade-off I'm willing to make for the significant gains in performance and longevity. In the long run, the M35's advantages in core functionality and user experience outweigh the Poco's advantages in price and weight.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.