Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 23, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 101.21 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.25 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 205 g 209 g
Height 164.2 mm 161.7 mm
Width 76.1 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Poco Yellow
  • Laser Black
  • Laser Blue
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 700 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.4 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

The Tale of Two Mid-Rangers: Poco X4 Pro 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A35

Let's embark on a journey to explore two compelling contenders in the mid-range smartphone arena: the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A35. We'll move beyond mere specs and delve into the heart of their design philosophies, uncovering how they translate into real-world user experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeaturePoco X4 Pro 5GSamsung Galaxy A35User Experience Impact
Interface DesignMIUI 13 (Android 11)One UI 5.0 (Android 14)A35 boasts a more modern OS with potentially longer software support and refined UI elements.
Interaction FlowEmphasis on customization and performanceFocus on seamless integration and ease of usePoco offers greater flexibility; Samsung prioritizes a smoother, out-of-the-box experience.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsEnhanced One UI accessibility featuresA35 likely provides more comprehensive accessibility options for users with diverse needs.
Design ErgonomicsLarger display (6.67"), side-mounted fingerprintSlightly smaller display (6.6"), under-display fingerprintPoco offers a more immersive viewing experience; Samsung provides a sleeker, modern aesthetic.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a photography enthusiast, Sarah. With the Poco X4 Pro, Sarah can explore the vibrant world through a large, bright AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, capturing stunning details with the 108MP main camera. The phone's powerful Snapdragon processor ensures smooth multitasking while editing photos on the go.

Now, picture David, a business professional. The Samsung Galaxy A35's sleek design and integrated One UI ecosystem seamlessly connect with his other Samsung devices. The under-display fingerprint sensor adds a touch of modern elegance, while the updated Android OS ensures long-term software support and security. He relies on the consistent performance and reliable software updates for a smooth workflow.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both devices cater to a broad user base. However, the A35's updated OS and potentially broader accessibility features might make it more appealing to users with specific needs or those seeking long-term software support. The Poco X4 Pro's larger display and emphasis on customization could attract tech-savvy individuals who value personalization.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The choice between these two devices hinges on individual priorities. If a user values a larger display, robust performance, and extensive customization options, the Poco X4 Pro 5G might be the better choice. If the focus is on seamless integration, a refined user experience, and long-term software updates, the Samsung Galaxy A35 stands out.

My Choice: The Samsung Galaxy A35

While the Poco X4 Pro 5G offers compelling features, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A35. The deciding factors are the more recent Android version (14) with longer software update commitment, promising a future-proof experience. The refined One UI, known for its intuitive design and seamless ecosystem integration, appeals to my preference for a smooth and user-friendly experience. Though subtly smaller, the under-display fingerprint sensor contributes to a more premium and modern aesthetic. While the Poco emphasizes customization, the A35's focus on a cohesive and user-friendly experience aligns more closely with my personal values in technology. The improved video capabilities and optical image stabilization of the A35 also offer a superior content creation experience. Ultimately, the A35 represents a more holistic and future-oriented approach to mobile technology design, even with a slightly higher price point in some configurations.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.