Xiaomi Poco X4 GT vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 108.18 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 200 g 189 g
Height 163.6 mm 164.1 mm
Width 74.3 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2460 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 407 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 650 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.62 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.96 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5080 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G610 MC6 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco X4 GT vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G: A Comparative Analysis

Let's dive deep into a head-to-head comparison of the Xiaomi Poco X4 GT and the ZTE Blade A75 4G, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer in terms of real-world performance.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco X4 GTZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6Poco X4 GT is slightly more compact.
Weight (g)200189ZTE Blade A75 4G is marginally lighter. Negligible difference in daily use.
Display
Size6.6"6.6"Same screen size.
Resolution1080 x 2460720 x 1612Poco X4 GT boasts significantly sharper visuals due to higher resolution (Full HD+ vs. HD+).
Refresh Rate144Hz90HzPoco X4 GT offers smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing gaming and overall UI responsiveness.
Display TypeIPS LCD, HDR10, Dolby VisionIPS LCDPoco X4 GT supports HDR10 and Dolby Vision, resulting in richer colors and better dynamic range.
Performance
ChipsetDimensity 8100 (5nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Poco X4 GT's 5nm chipset offers significantly better performance and power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.85 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz A75 & 6x1.6 GHz A55)Poco X4 GT's CPU is considerably more powerful, especially for demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUMali-G610 MC6Mali-G57 MP1Poco X4 GT provides a far superior gaming experience and handles graphics-intensive apps with ease.
RAM8GB4/8GBBoth offer ample RAM, but the 8GB variant of either phone provides smoother multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera64MP50MPBoth offer high-resolution sensors; image quality will depend more on software processing and sensor quality.
Ultrawide8MPN/APoco X4 GT offers ultrawide photography for capturing broader scenes.
Macro2MP0.3MP (Depth Sensor)Poco X4 GT has a dedicated macro lens, although 2MP is still quite basic. The ZTE Blade A75 uses a low-resolution depth sensor instead of a true macro lens.
Battery Life
Capacity5080mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacities; real-world battery life will depend on usage and optimization.
Fast Charging67W22.5WPoco X4 GT charges significantly faster.
PriceMediumLowPoco X4 GT is more expensive but offers significantly better value for its price.

2. Key Insights

The Xiaomi Poco X4 GT is the clear performance champion. Its powerful Dimensity 8100 chipset, high refresh rate display, and fast charging capabilities make it ideal for demanding users, mobile gamers, and content creators.

The ZTE Blade A75 4G is a budget-friendly option offering basic functionality. It's suitable for users who prioritize affordability and primarily use their phones for calling, texting, and light browsing. While it has a large display, the lower resolution and refresh rate noticeably impact the user experience compared to the Poco X4 GT.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X4 GT: Ideal for power users, gamers, content creators, and those seeking a premium experience without a flagship price tag.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Suitable for budget-conscious users, seniors, or those who need a simple phone for basic communication and tasks. Not recommended for gaming or demanding applications.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The ZTE Blade A75 4G is significantly cheaper. If price is the primary concern, it might be the only option.
  2. What do you primarily use your phone for? For demanding tasks like gaming, content creation, or multitasking, the Poco X4 GT is essential. For basic communication and web browsing, the ZTE Blade A75 4G might suffice.
  3. How important is future-proofing? The Poco X4 GT's superior hardware will likely offer better performance and longevity.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco X4 GT

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would unequivocally pick the Xiaomi Poco X4 GT. The superior performance, smoother display, faster charging, and overall richer feature set vastly outweigh the price difference for me. I value a responsive and enjoyable user experience, and the Poco X4 GT delivers that in spades. While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers great value for its low price, the compromises in performance and features are too significant for my personal needs and preferences. The Poco X4 GT's Dimensity 8100 chip ensures smooth performance for years to come, and the 144Hz display makes everyday interactions delightful. The faster charging is a huge bonus in my busy life. It’s a device built for speed and efficiency, which aligns perfectly with my usage patterns.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.