Xiaomi Poco X4 GT vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 108.18 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 200 g 209 g
Height 163.6 mm 161.7 mm
Width 74.3 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2460 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 21:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 407 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 650 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.62 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.96 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5080 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G610 MC6 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco X4 GT vs. Samsung Galaxy A35: A Comparative Analysis

Let's dive deep into a head-to-head comparison of the Xiaomi Poco X4 GT and the Samsung Galaxy A35, dissecting their specs and uncovering what they truly offer in real-world usage.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco X4 GTSamsung Galaxy A35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9161.7 x 78 x 8.2A35 is slightly shorter and narrower, potentially more comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight (g)200209Negligible weight difference; both feel substantial in hand.
Display
TypeIPS LCD, 144HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzPOCO: Smoother fast-paced content, brighter outdoors. A35: Richer colors, deeper blacks, better power efficiency
Size6.6"6.6"Identical screen real estate for immersive media consumption.
Resolution1080 x 24601080 x 2340Virtually indistinguishable sharpness; both offer crisp visuals.
Performance
ChipsetDimensity 8100Exynos 1380Both are powerful mid-range chips, but benchmarks suggest Dimensity 8100 might edge out in raw performance.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.85 GHz & 4x2.0 GHz)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz & 4x2.0 GHz)POCO: Potentially faster multi-core performance for demanding tasks.
RAM8GB6GB/8GB8GB offers better multitasking and future-proofing on both.
Camera
Main Camera64MP50MPPOCO: Higher resolution for detailed shots. A35: Samsung's sensor tech often excels in image processing and low light.
Video4K@30fps4K@30fpsComparable video recording capabilities. A35 boasts Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for smoother videos.
Battery Life
Capacity5080mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacities; real-world usage will depend on software optimization and individual habits.
Charging67W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingPOCO: Significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Poco X4 GT's Dimensity 8100 and higher clock speeds give it a potential edge in raw performance, particularly for gaming and demanding applications. The A35's Exynos 1380 is no slouch, but might fall slightly behind in benchmarks.
  • Display: The X4 GT's 144Hz IPS LCD delivers incredibly smooth visuals for gaming and scrolling, while the A35's 120Hz Super AMOLED offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and superior power efficiency. This is a classic trade-off: buttery smooth refresh rate versus vibrant visuals and battery savings.
  • Camera: While the Poco X4 GT boasts a higher resolution main sensor (64MP), Samsung's camera processing often excels in producing pleasing images, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The A35's OIS is a significant advantage for video recording, resulting in noticeably smoother footage.
  • Charging: The Poco X4 GT's 67W fast charging dramatically outpaces the A35's 25W, meaning significantly less time tethered to a charger.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Poco X4 GT: Ideal for power users, mobile gamers, and those who prioritize performance and fast charging. The 144Hz display is a major draw for fast-paced content.
  • Samsung Galaxy A35: Suitable for users who value a vibrant display, excellent camera quality with OIS, and Samsung's software ecosystem. The longer software update support is a bonus.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What are your top priorities? Raw performance and fast charging (POCO), or a vibrant display, stable video recording, and longer software support (A35)?
  2. What's your budget? Compare prices in your region, considering the different storage options available for each phone.
  3. What kind of user are you? A gamer, a content creator, a casual user?

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco X4 GT

For me, the Poco X4 GT's performance advantage and blazing-fast charging are decisive factors. As someone who frequently uses demanding applications and values minimal downtime, the Dimensity 8100 and 67W charging are compelling. While I appreciate the A35's AMOLED display and OIS, the POCO's responsiveness and quick charging align better with my personal needs and usage patterns. The higher refresh rate display on the Poco is also a significant draw, offering a tangible improvement in perceived smoothness for everyday tasks and gaming. While the A35 is a well-rounded device, the Poco X4 GT offers a compelling combination of power and speed that makes it the winner for me.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.