Xiaomi Poco X4 GT vs Motorola Edge 50 Neo - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 August 29, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 108.18 cm³ 88.87 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 200 g 171 g
Height 163.6 mm 154.1 mm
Width 74.3 mm 71.2 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Nautical Blue
  • Latte
  • Grisaille
  • Poinciana

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1080 x 2460 1256 x 2760
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 407 PPI 474 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 650 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.62 mAh/in² 105.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.96 mAh/cm³ 48.5 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5080 mAh 4310 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G610 MC6 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 19

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco X4 GT vs. Motorola Edge 50 Neo: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Xiaomi Poco X4 GT and the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, two compelling contenders in the mid-range smartphone arena. My analysis goes beyond the spec sheet, connecting the dots between raw numbers and real-world user experience.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco X4 GTMotorola Edge 50 NeoReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9154.1 x 71.2 x 8.1Edge 50 Neo is slightly more compact and pocketable.
Weight (g)200171Noticeable difference in hand; Edge 50 Neo feels lighter.
Display
TypeIPS LCD, 144HzpOLED, 120HzPoco X4 GT boasts smoother animations; Edge 50 Neo offers deeper blacks and potentially better battery life due to the LTPO panel.
Size6.6"6.4"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 24601256 x 2760Edge 50 Neo packs a sharper display with higher pixel density.
Performance
ChipsetDimensity 8100Dimensity 7300Poco X4 GT likely offers a performance advantage in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)While both have similar core configurations, the Poco X4 GT has a higher clock speed on its performance cores, potentially giving it an edge in processing power.
RAM8GB8GB/12GBEdge 50 Neo offers a 12GB RAM option for enhanced multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera64MP50MPPoco X4 GT has higher resolution; image quality depends on sensor and processing.
FeaturesTriple Camera, 4K@30fpsTriple Camera, 4K@30fps with EISEdge 50 Neo benefits from Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother videos.
Battery
Capacity5080 mAh4310 mAhPoco X4 GT offers significantly longer battery life.
Charging67W Fast Charging68W Fast ChargingNegligible difference in charging speeds.

2. Key Insights

The Poco X4 GT prioritizes performance and battery life. Its Dimensity 8100 chipset and 144Hz display cater to gamers and power users. The larger battery ensures extended usage without frequent recharges. However, it compromises slightly on display quality and camera features.

The Motorola Edge 50 Neo, on the other hand, strikes a balance between performance, display, and camera. Its OLED screen delivers vibrant colors and deep blacks, while the inclusion of EIS enhances video recording. The slightly weaker processor might be noticeable in demanding tasks compared to the Poco X4 GT, and the smaller battery capacity may require more frequent charging. The higher resolution front facing camera (32MP vs 16MP) could be a deciding factor for selfie enthusiasts.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Poco X4 GT: Ideal for gamers, power users, and anyone prioritizing raw performance and long battery life. If you're constantly pushing your phone to its limits and value smooth gameplay, this is a strong contender.

Motorola Edge 50 Neo: Suitable for users who appreciate a vibrant display, a compact form factor, and a well-rounded feature set. It caters to content consumers, social media enthusiasts, and those seeking a stylish and reliable device. Users who value taking selfies may also prefer the Edge 50 Neo for its higher resolution front-facing camera.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What's your primary phone usage? Gaming and heavy multitasking favor the Poco X4 GT; content consumption and casual use lean towards the Edge 50 Neo.
  2. How important is battery life? The Poco X4 GT's larger battery offers a clear advantage in this department.
  3. Do you prioritize display quality or refresh rate? The Edge 50 Neo's OLED excels in color accuracy and contrast; the Poco X4 GT offers smoother scrolling and animations.

My Choice: The Poco X4 GT

While both phones are solid options, I'd choose the Poco X4 GT. As a tech journalist, I often push my devices hard, running benchmarks, testing apps, and capturing multimedia content. The superior performance of the Dimensity 8100 combined with the incredibly long-lasting battery aligns perfectly with my workflow. I can tolerate the slightly less vibrant LCD screen considering the significant gains in performance and battery endurance. The 144Hz refresh rate is a personal preference, as it ensures a buttery smooth user experience that I find invaluable for both productivity and gaming. While I appreciate the Edge 50 Neo's sleek design and vibrant display, the Poco X4 GT's raw power and endurance are more compelling for my needs.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.