Xiaomi Poco X4 GT vs Motorola Edge 50 Fusion - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 27, 2022 May 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 108.18 cm³ 93.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.3 "/g 3.83 "/g
Weight 200 g 174.9 g
Height 163.6 mm 161.9 mm
Width 74.3 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Forest Blue
  • Marshmallow Blue
  • Hot Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2460 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.1 % 91.6 %
Pixel Density 407 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 650 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.62 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 46.96 mAh/cm³ 53.48 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5080 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - International
CPU Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - International
GPU Mali-G610 MC6 Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Xiaomi Poco X4 GT vs. Motorola Edge 50 Fusion: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Xiaomi Poco X4 GT and the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, two compelling mid-range contenders, to see which phone reigns supreme. We'll go beyond the spec sheet, translating those numbers into real-world experiences.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco X4 GTMotorola Edge 50 FusionReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9Fusion slightly more compact, potentially easier one-handed use.
Weight (g)200174.9Fusion noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue.
Build MaterialsGlass front, plastic frame, plastic backGlass front, plastic frame, plastic backSimilar durability; case recommended for both.
Display
TypeIPS LCDP-OLEDFusion offers deeper blacks, better contrast, and potential power savings due to pixel self-illumination
Size6.6"6.7"Fusion slightly larger; both offer immersive experiences.
Refresh Rate144Hz144Hz (INT), 120Hz (LATAM)Both exceptionally smooth for gaming and scrolling; regional difference to note for Fusion.
Resolution1080 x 24601080 x 2400Comparable sharpness; minimal real-world difference.
Performance
ChipsetDimensity 8100Snapdragon 7s Gen 2Both capable mid-range chips; benchmarks needed for definitive comparison.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.85 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x1.95 GHz A55)Poco X4 GT likely has a slight edge in CPU performance due to higher clock speeds on performance cores.
GPUMali-G610 MC6Adreno 710Gaming performance comparison requires real-world testing.
RAM8GB8GBSufficient for multitasking and demanding apps on both.
Camera
Main64MP50MPMegapixels don't tell the whole story; image quality depends on sensor size, processing, and aperture.
Ultrawide8MP13MP + Macro LensFusion's wider ultrawide captures more scenery; dedicated macro lens offers detailed close-ups.
Selfie16MP32MPFusion boasts higher resolution for selfies.
Battery Life
Capacity5080mAh5000mAhNegligible difference in capacity; real-world usage will vary.
Charging67W Wired68W WiredBoth offer incredibly fast charging; minimal difference in speed.

2. Key Insights

  • Display: The Fusion's P-OLED display delivers richer visuals with deeper blacks and vibrant colors, making content consumption more enjoyable. The Poco X4 GT's 144Hz refresh rate might provide a smoother experience in certain games, but the Fusion is no slouch at 120Hz (or 144Hz depending on the region).
  • Performance: The Dimensity 8100 in the Poco X4 GT, with its higher clock speeds, might offer a slight performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. However, both chipsets should handle everyday tasks and gaming with ease. Real-world testing is needed to declare a clear winner.
  • Camera: The Fusion's camera system seems more versatile. The combined ultrawide and macro lens allows for more creative shooting options. The higher resolution selfie camera is also attractive for social media enthusiasts. However, image quality relies heavily on software processing, so real-world comparisons are crucial.
  • Battery and Charging: Both phones offer excellent battery life and blazing fast charging. The differences are marginal and unlikely to significantly impact daily use.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Poco X4 GT: Gamers seeking potentially higher frame rates and raw CPU power, users prioritizing a faster refresh rate over display quality, budget-conscious users looking for strong performance.
  • Motorola Edge 50 Fusion: Users who value a superior display for media consumption, those who prefer a lighter and more compact phone, photography enthusiasts who want a versatile camera system.

4. Buying Decision Framework:

  1. Is display quality your top priority? If yes, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion's P-OLED screen is the clear winner.
  2. Are you a hardcore mobile gamer? If yes, the Poco X4 GT's potentially higher frame rates and slightly faster CPU might give it an edge (pending benchmark and gaming tests).
  3. Which camera system aligns with your needs? If you prioritize versatility and a high-resolution selfie camera, the Fusion's camera setup is more compelling.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Fusion

While both are excellent phones, I'd personally choose the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion. The superior P-OLED display is a major selling point for me, as I consume a lot of media on my phone. The lighter and slightly more compact design is also appealing. While benchmarks are needed to confirm performance differences, the Fusion's more versatile camera system and the comparable battery life and charging speeds solidify my choice. The slightly higher price might be a factor for some, but I believe the Fusion's advantages justify the premium for my personal needs.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.