Smartphone Comparison: Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs. ZTE Blade V60 Design
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | ZTE Blade V60 Design | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm | 164.2 x 75.3 x 8.6 mm | Poco X3 Pro is slightly larger and thicker, potentially less comfortable for one-handed use. |
| Weight | 215g | 198g | ZTE Blade V60 Design is lighter, better for extended holding. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.67" | 6.6" | Negligible size difference in practical use. |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 | 720 x 1612 | Poco X3 Pro has a much sharper display; clearer text, images, and videos. |
| PPI | 395 | 267 | Poco X3 Pro displays significantly more detail, leading to crisper visuals. |
| Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | Identical display technology; similar color and viewing angles. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 90Hz | Poco X3 Pro offers smoother scrolling and animations, better for gaming and UI navigation. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Neither brightness is specified; unclear how they perform outdoors |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Poco X3 Pro's chipset is significantly more powerful; faster app loading and better gaming performance. |
| AnTuTu Score | 627,869 | 240,000 | Poco X3 Pro has much better performance; suitable for heavy use and gaming |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Mali-G57 MP1 | Poco X3 Pro’s GPU is significantly better for demanding graphics tasks. |
| Camera | |||
| Rear Camera (Main) | 48MP, f/1.79 | 50MP, f/1.8 | Minor difference in resolution, Poco X3 Pro has slightly better light gathering capabilities |
| Front Camera | 20MP, f/2.2 | 8MP | Poco X3 Pro has much higher resolution for clearer selfies. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 8MP, f/2.2 | Not Available | Poco X3 Pro offers wider field of view shots; versatile for landscapes and group photos. |
| Portrait (Depth) | 2MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4 | Similar secondary lens for better portrait mode effects |
| Macro Lens | 2MP, f/2.4 | Not Available | Poco X3 Pro can take close-up photos with more detail |
| Video Recording | Up to 4K@30fps | Up to 1080p@30fps | Poco X3 Pro supports much higher quality videos; better for recording memories and high-quality content. |
| Video Stabilization | EIS | EIS | Both have electronic image stabilization; smoother video recording while moving. |
| Slow-motion | Yes, 960 fps | No | Poco X3 Pro offers better slow-motion capabilities |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh | Similar battery capacity; expected to offer comparable battery life on average use. |
| Charging | 33W Fast Charging | 22.5W Fast Charging | Poco X3 Pro charges faster; quicker power-ups when needed |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128/256 GB | 256 GB | Both have a max storage of 256GB, which should be enough for most users. |
| RAM | 6/8 GB | 4/6 GB | Poco X3 Pro offers more RAM; better multitasking and smoother performance |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone has expandable storage |
| Software | |||
| OS Version | Android 11 (upgradable to 12) | Android 13 | ZTE Blade V60 has a newer version of android out of the box and potentially gets more updates. |
| Audio | |||
| Audio Quality | Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers | DTS / DTS X | Poco X3 Pro has higher-quality audio with a richer sound experience with more clarity and immersion, while the ZTE is better in terms of sound enhancement. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi MiMO | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | Both support dual-band Wi-Fi; Poco X3 Pro has additional MiMO capability for better signal strength and transfer rates. |
| Bluetooth | 5.0, LE, APT-x, LDAC, SBC, AAC | 5.0, LE | Poco X3 Pro has more Bluetooth audio codecs which may give better audio quality |
| Security | |||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Side-mounted | Side-mounted | Both have similar fingerprint sensors for security. |
| Build | |||
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Unknown | Poco X3 Pro has superior screen protection against scratches and minor impacts |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic Proximity Sensor | Fingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity sensor | Both offer full set of sensors for common functionality. Poco X3 Pro has a more advanced proximity sensor. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro Advantages:
- Significantly Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 860 chipset offers much better processing power, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance.
- Sharper and Smoother Display: Higher resolution and 120Hz refresh rate result in significantly better visual experience.
- Better Camera System: Higher resolution front camera, wide-angle and macro lenses add versatility to photography.
- Higher Quality Video Recording: 4K recording and superior slow-motion capabilities give much more video recording capabilities.
- Faster Charging: 33W charging is faster to recharge the battery.
- Better Audio: Hi-Res Audio with stereo speakers provide better audio quality.
- Superior Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 6 offers better screen protection.
ZTE Blade V60 Design Advantages:
- Newer Operating System: Ships with Android 13, offering the latest software features and security.
- Lighter: Slightly lighter, which makes it more comfortable to hold for longer periods.
Trade-offs:
- The Poco X3 Pro trades slightly less weight and a newer Android version for significant improvements in performance, display, and camera capabilities.
- The ZTE Blade V60 Design focuses on a lighter design and newer OS but lacks the power, display quality, and camera versatility of the Poco X3 Pro.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro:
- Ideal User: Gamers, power users, multimedia consumers who prioritize performance, display quality, and camera versatility.
- Use Cases:
- Gaming: Smooth gameplay in demanding titles, quick app switching during multitasking.
- Photography and Videography: Capturing higher resolution photos, wide-angle landscapes, high quality videos.
- Media Consumption: Watching videos and movies, enjoying sharper, smoother visuals.
- Price-to-Value: Offers outstanding performance for the price, appealing to users seeking high performance without paying top dollar.
ZTE Blade V60 Design:
- Ideal User: Budget-conscious users, casual smartphone users, users who prioritize lightweight design and the latest Android OS.
- Use Cases:
- Basic everyday tasks: Browsing the internet, social media, emails, calling and messaging.
- Casual photography: Snapping photos of friends and family, and other standard moments.
- Users who are not doing intensive tasks and prefer a light weight phone.
- Price-to-Value: A budget phone that covers the basic functions with a simple, functional design.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Performance Needs: Do I need a high-performance phone for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, or is basic functionality sufficient?
- Display Preference: Do I value a high-resolution and high refresh rate display for a better viewing experience?
- Camera Requirements: Do I need versatile camera options, high-resolution photos, and high quality video recording?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: If you are a gamer or a user who values top-tier performance and media consumption, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the clear choice due to its superior chipset, display, and camera capabilities.
- Scenario 2: If you are a casual user, prioritize a lighter design, newer OS and budget is a major factor, the ZTE Blade V60 Design is the right choice.
- Scenario 3: If you are looking for a better camera to take photos and videos of important moments, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is a better option with its 4k video recording, wide-angle and macro lens.
My Choice:
I would choose the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro. While the ZTE Blade V60 Design has a slightly newer OS and is lighter, the Poco X3 Pro's advantages are too significant to ignore. As someone who values performance, display quality and camera capabilities, the Snapdragon 860 chipset, the 120Hz display, 4k video recording, and superior camera system offer a much better experience for my usage habits. The marginal increase in weight is a small price to pay for the substantial gains in overall performance and user experience. The ability to play demanding games with a high refresh rate, and capture better quality photos and videos is something I value over the newer OS and light weight design that the Blade V60 has to offer.
