Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2021 December 1, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 119.33 cm³ 108.86 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.1 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 215 g 181 g
Height 165.3 mm 162 mm
Width 76.8 mm 75.5 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Phantom Black
  • Frost Blue
  • Metal Bronze
  • Carbon Gray
  • Pebble White
  • Sea Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 83.4 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.24 mAh/cm³ 45.93 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 640 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11 4GPractical Impact
Dimensions165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm162 x 75.5 x 8.9 mmPoco X3 Pro is slightly larger and thicker; Note 11 4G is more compact and pocketable.
Weight215g181gNote 11 4G is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use.

Display

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11 4GPractical Impact
Size6.67"6.5"Poco X3 Pro offers a slightly larger screen, better for media consumption.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Both offer identical sharpness; similar visual experience.
PPI395405Virtually identical pixel density, resulting in similar clarity.
TechnologyIPS LCDPoco X3 Pro's IPS LCD is known for good colour reproduction and viewing angles; Redmi Note 11 4G is not specified, limiting comparison.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzPoco X3 Pro provides smoother scrolling and animations, making the UI feel more responsive.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth have the same peak brightness, impacting visibility under direct sunlight (no data available).

Performance

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11 4GPractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm)Mediatek Helio G88 (12 nm)Poco X3 Pro's Snapdragon 860 is significantly more powerful, resulting in faster app loading and better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score627,869253,100Poco X3 Pro provides significantly better performance in benchmarks, indicating it's more capable for demanding tasks.
GPUAdreno 640Mali-G52 MC2Poco X3 Pro's Adreno 640 delivers superior gaming performance compared to Mali-G52 MC2.

Camera

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11 4GPractical Impact
Main Camera48MP, f/1.79, 1/2", Sony IMX58250MP, f/1.8Note 11 4G has a slightly higher resolution, but Poco X3 Pro has a wider aperture and better sensor details, possibly better low light performance.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.2, 1/3.4", Samsung S5K3T28MP, f/2.0Poco X3 Pro has a much higher resolution for selfies; Redmi Note 11 4G has a slightly wider aperture.
Wide Angle8MP, f/2.2, 1/4", Omnivision OV88568MP, f/2.2Both offer similar wide-angle capabilities, capturing more of the scene.
Portrait Lens2MP, f/2.4, 1/5", Omnivision OV02B1BNonePoco X3 Pro has a dedicated depth sensor, potentially offering better portrait mode photos.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4, 1/5", Hynix HI-2592MP, f/2.4Both offer the same 2MP macro lens.
VideoUp to 4K@30fps with EIS; Slow-motion 960 fpsUp to 1080p@30fps; Slow-motion 120 fpsPoco X3 Pro captures higher resolution video with more slow-motion capabilities; Note 11 4G is limited to 1080p.
FeaturesQuadruple camera, Manual focus, PanoramaTriple camera, RAWPoco X3 Pro offers more camera features like manual focus and panorama; Redmi Note 11 4G has RAW for advanced editing.

Battery

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11 4GPractical Impact
Capacity5160mAh5000mAhBoth have similar battery capacity; expect comparable battery life under similar usage.
Charging33W Fast Charging18W Fast ChargingPoco X3 Pro charges considerably faster, reducing charging time.
FeaturesNon-removableReverse charging, Non-removableNote 11 4G can be used as a power bank for other devices.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 860 chipset provides significantly better performance, making it better for gaming and demanding apps.
  • Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate offers a smoother and more responsive visual experience.
  • Better Camera Features: It offers a depth camera for better portrait shots and can record 4k videos.
  • Faster Charging: 33W fast charging means shorter waiting times.
  • Hi-Res Audio: A slight edge in audio quality due to its Hi-Res audio feature.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Compact: More comfortable to hold and easier to carry in pockets.
  • Reverse Charging: Can be used as a power bank for other devices.
  • RAW Camera: More flexibility in photo editing.
  • Newer Bluetooth: Bluetooth 5.1 offers a more stable and efficient connection.

Trade-offs:

  • The Poco X3 Pro's higher performance comes with added weight and bulk.
  • The Redmi Note 11 4G sacrifices performance for a lighter build and reverse charging.
  • The Redmi Note 11 4G has an unknown display technology, making the display quality difficult to compare.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro:

  • Ideal User: Gamers, power users, or anyone who prioritizes performance and smooth visuals.
  • Use Cases:
    • Playing graphically intensive mobile games.
    • Video editing or running demanding apps.
    • Frequent media consumption (videos, movies).
  • Price-to-Value: Offers exceptional performance for the price, making it suitable for budget-conscious users who don't want to sacrifice power.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G:

  • Ideal User: Everyday users who value portability, battery features, and good camera quality for basic use.
  • Use Cases:
    • Everyday social media browsing and communication.
    • General photography, including landscape photos and the ability to edit using RAW.
    • Those who need the reverse charging capability.
  • Price-to-Value: A more affordable option that balances everyday performance with usability.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is performance? If gaming or heavy multitasking is a priority, the Poco X3 Pro is superior.
  2. How much do you value portability and battery features? If being lightweight and having the capability to reverse charge other devices is crucial, the Redmi Note 11 4G will be better.
  3. What type of camera features do you prioritize? If 4K video and depth sensing is crucial, the Poco X3 Pro will be a better option. If you are interested in post-processing your photos, the RAW image option from the Redmi Note 11 4G would be useful.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Gaming on a budget? Choose the Poco X3 Pro for its gaming performance.
  • Scenario 2: Need a reliable, comfortable everyday phone? Choose the Redmi Note 11 4G for its portability and reverse charging.
  • Scenario 3: Photo editing? The Redmi Note 11 4G offers the RAW format, which is useful for advanced editing.
  • Scenario 4: Video focused? The Poco X3 Pro offers 4k video capture and much better slow motion capabilities.

My Choice

I would choose the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro. The significant performance advantage provided by the Snapdragon 860 is the main reason. While the Redmi Note 11 4G offers some appealing aspects like lighter weight and reverse charging, my focus is on the raw performance for running apps and smooth scrolling with a better refresh rate.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.