Smartphone Comparison: Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs. Tecno Spark Go 2023
1. Specifications Comparison
Here's a detailed comparison of the key specifications for both phones, emphasizing their practical impact on the user experience:
Design
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | Tecno Spark Go 2023 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 165.3 × 76.8 × 9.4 mm | 163.9 × 75.5 × 8.9 mm | Poco X3 Pro is slightly larger and thicker, potentially less comfortable for one-handed use compared to the Spark Go 2023. |
| Weight | 215g | 0g (Likely an error) | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is heavier, which may be noticeable during extended use. Actual weight of Tecno Spark Go 2023 is unknown. |
| Build | Unknown | Unknown | No information available for build material, affecting durability and overall feel |
Display
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | Tecno Spark Go 2023 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.67" | 6.6" | Similar screen sizes; slight difference won't be noticeable during everyday usage |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | Poco X3 Pro provides sharper images and text with a higher resolution, leading to better visual clarity. |
| Pixel Density | 395 PPI | 267 PPI | Poco X3 Pro’s sharper display has noticeably crisper images, important for reading text, browsing photos, and videos. |
| Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | Both have similar color reproduction and viewing angles; no significant difference |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 60Hz | Poco X3 Pro has smoother scrolling, animations and better gaming with its 120Hz screen, making the phone feel more responsive |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both phone have an unknown brightness, making comparison impossible |
Performance
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | Tecno Spark Go 2023 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Poco X3 Pro offers significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming; it is considerably more powerful than the Tecno Spark Go 2023 |
| AnTuTu Score | 627,869 | 92,140 | Poco X3 Pro offers vastly superior performance, making it better suited for demanding apps and games; the Spark Go 2023 is limited to basic tasks. |
| GPU | Adreno 640 (Qualcomm Adreno 640) | PowerVR GE8320 (IMG PowerVR GE-class GPU) | Poco X3 Pro's GPU provides smoother graphics in games and apps; Tecno Spark Go 2023's GPU is less capable. |
Camera
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | Tecno Spark Go 2023 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Camera | 48MP, f/1.79, 1/2" sensor, 0.8µm pixel, Sony IMX582 Exmor RS | 13MP, f/1.85 | Poco X3 Pro has higher resolution, capturing more detail and better low-light performance |
| Selfie Camera | 20MP, f/2.2, 1/3.4" sensor, 0.8µm pixel, Samsung S5K3T2 | 5MP, f/2.0 | Poco X3 Pro offers higher-resolution selfies with more details, while the Spark Go 2023 provides slightly brighter selfie with wider aperture |
| Wide Angle Lens | 8MP, f/2.2, 1/4" sensor, 1.12µm pixel, Omnivision OV8856 | Not Available | Poco X3 Pro captures wider scenes and group photos with its dedicated wide angle lens |
| Portrait (Depth) | 2MP, f/2.4, 1/5" sensor, 1.75µm pixel, Omnivision OV02B1B | Not Available | Poco X3 Pro captures photos with more natural background blur due to its dedicated depth sensor |
| Macro Lens | 2MP, f/2.4, 1/5" sensor, 1.75µm pixel, Hynix HI-259 | Not Available | Poco X3 Pro captures more detailed close up shots due to its dedicated macro lens |
| Video Recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps w/ EIS | 1080p@30fps | Poco X3 Pro can record higher quality video with 4K and has a variety of high fps options for slow motion videos; both offer EIS which is crucial for smooth video recordings. |
Battery
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | Tecno Spark Go 2023 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5160mAh | 5000mAh | Similar battery life, both should last a full day for moderate use; the difference is negligible |
| Charging | 33W fast charging, Li-Polymer | 10W fast charging, Li-Ion Polymer | Poco X3 Pro charges much faster with its 33W charger, reducing waiting time; difference in battery tech is negligible. |
| Battery Feature | Non-removable | Non-removable | Both phones have the same basic features |
Other
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro | Tecno Spark Go 2023 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 12) | Android 12 | Tecno Spark Go 2023 has a more recent operating system. The Poco X3 Pro may receive some updates in the future, but its age could limit long-term support. |
| Wi-Fi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | 802.11b/g/n | Poco X3 Pro supports faster Wi-Fi standards, for faster download speeds and more stable connections |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 LE | 4.2 LE | Poco X3 Pro offers a more modern Bluetooth standard with higher speeds, better energy efficiency, and more features (aptX, etc) |
| Storage | 128GB/256GB | 64GB | Poco X3 Pro provides more storage for media and apps; the difference is substantial. |
| RAM | 6GB/8GB | 3GB | Poco X3 Pro enables smoother multitasking with its more RAM |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Both phones do not offer SD card support |
| Audio | Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers | Basic Audio | Poco X3 Pro provides a much richer audio experience with higher quality sound and stereo output |
| Security | Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor | Rear-mounted Fingerprint Sensor | Fingerprint unlock offers enhanced security, the side mounted sensor is generally considered more convenient |
| Screen Protection | Gorilla Glass 6 | Unknown | Poco X3 Pro offers better screen protection against scratches and drops |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic proximity virtual, Fingerprint | Accelerometer, Proximity, Fingerprint | Poco X3 Pro has a more comprehensive suite of sensors, which enables more accurate orientation, and better gaming/AR experiences |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro Advantages:
- Significantly Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 860 chipset offers a much faster experience for all tasks, particularly gaming and demanding apps.
- Higher Quality Display: Higher resolution, pixel density and 120Hz refresh rate make for a significantly sharper and smoother visual experience.
- More Versatile Camera System: The inclusion of a wide-angle, depth and macro lens along with higher resolution for main and selfie cameras provides superior versatility.
- Faster Charging: 33W charging significantly reduces charging times compared to the Tecno's 10W charging.
- Better Audio Experience: High-Res audio and stereo speakers offer superior sound quality.
- More RAM and Storage: Much more memory and storage to store all your data without running out of space or dealing with bottlenecks in multitasking
- Advanced Connectivity: Newer standards of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth ensure better experience and future proofing.
Tecno Spark Go 2023 Advantages:
- Newer OS: Comes with Android 12 out of the box, however there is no guarantee of future updates.
- Lighter and Slightly More Compact Design: It is slightly smaller which can be ideal for one hand usage.
Trade-offs:
- The Poco X3 Pro is more expensive and may be less accessible to some users. Its older operating system may be a drawback for some, though it is upgradable.
- The Tecno Spark Go 2023 sacrifices performance and screen quality for a lower price. Its limited camera capabilities and lack of premium features make it unsuitable for users seeking a more capable smartphone.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro Ideal User:
- Performance-Oriented Users: Gamers, power users, and those who want a smooth, lag-free experience.
- Photography Enthusiasts: Users who appreciate a versatile camera system for capturing a variety of shots.
- Media Consumers: Users who enjoy watching videos and movies with higher screen quality.
- Users looking for more premium features: Users who prefer faster charging, better audio and a more future proof device.
Tecno Spark Go 2023 Ideal User:
- Budget-Conscious Users: Those who need a basic phone for simple tasks at a low price.
- First-Time Smartphone Buyers: New users who don’t need many advanced features.
- Users with basic requirements: Those who prioritize a more recent OS, and do not need more sophisticated performance.
Use Cases:
- Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro: Gaming, high-quality media consumption, photography, multitasking, and general daily tasks with fast response times.
- Tecno Spark Go 2023: Basic communication, browsing, social media, and light app usage.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is your budget? The Poco X3 Pro is likely more expensive, while the Tecno is targeted for budget-conscious consumers.
- How important is performance? If you plan to game, multitask heavily, or do anything beyond basic tasks the Poco is the only viable option.
- What type of camera do you need? For photography enthusiasts or those who want a versatile camera, the Poco is a better choice with its wide-angle, macro, and depth sensors.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Budget is the primary concern. If you need a very basic phone for calls and light use and want the lowest price, the Tecno Spark Go 2023 may suffice.
- Scenario 2: Performance is crucial, within a budget. If you prioritize smooth performance for gaming and multitasking, the Poco X3 Pro is a clear winner.
- Scenario 3: Camera versatility is key. If you want to take photos with different lenses (wide-angle, close-up, etc.) go with the Poco X3 Pro.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro. The difference in performance is just too massive to ignore. The Snapdragon 860 is leaps and bounds ahead of the entry-level MediaTek Helio A22. Furthermore, the Poco X3 Pro also comes with a better screen, a much more versatile camera system and faster charging. The better connectivity standard and additional features, along with more RAM and storage make it a much more complete package. While it's older, and may not get the latest Android updates, the user experience is so much better that it is worth the trade-off. The Tecno Spark Go 2023 is simply too limited and should only be considered if you absolutely cannot go beyond a very low budget, as its use case is extremely basic.
