Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs TCL 50 SE - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
TCL 50 SE
TCL 50 SE
Tcl

General

Launch Date March 24, 2021 April 8, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 119.33 cm³ 102.86 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.1 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 215 g 195 g
Height 165.3 mm 168.2 mm
Width 76.8 mm 75.5 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Phantom Black
  • Frost Blue
  • Metal Bronze
  • Space Gray
  • Midnight Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 86 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits 550 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 108.99 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.24 mAh/cm³ 48.71 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 5010 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) Mediatek Helio G88 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 640 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 ProTCL 50 SEPractical Impact
Dimensions165.3 × 76.8 × 9.4 mm168.2 × 75.5 × 8.1 mmTCL 50 SE is taller and thinner, while Poco X3 Pro is wider and thicker. Poco X3 Pro will feel more bulky in the pocket, while the TCL 50 SE might be easier to handle.
Weight215g195gTCL 50 SE is lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use. Poco X3 Pro will feel heavier during extended periods of use.

Display

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 ProTCL 50 SEPractical Impact
Size6.67"6.78"TCL 50 SE has a slightly larger screen, offering a marginally more immersive viewing experience.
Resolution1080x24001080x2460Both have very similar resolutions; the minor difference is not noticeable in everyday use.
PPI395396Both phones have almost identical pixel density, resulting in similar sharpness.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth have similar color reproduction and viewing angles.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzXiaomi Poco X3 Pro offers smoother scrolling and animations, which can feel more responsive in day-to-day use.
Brightness0 nits900 nitsTCL 50 SE offers dramatically better screen visibility in bright sunlight and outdoor conditions. Poco X3 Pro's brightness information is missing.

Performance

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 ProTCL 50 SEPractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm)Mediatek Helio G88 (12 nm)Snapdragon 860 offers significantly higher processing power, making the Poco X3 Pro perform better for demanding tasks like gaming and multitasking. The Mediatek G88 in the TCL 50 SE is better suited for everyday use.
AnTuTu Score627,869250,000Poco X3 Pro is much faster and smoother in running apps and games due to higher performance. TCL 50 SE will not handle as many demanding apps and games.
GPUAdreno 640Mali-G52 MC2The Adreno 640 in the Poco X3 Pro is much more capable, resulting in smoother and more detailed graphics in games and other graphically intensive applications. The Mali G52 MC2 in the TCL 50 SE is capable of everyday graphic tasks.

Camera

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 ProTCL 50 SEPractical Impact
Rear Standard Camera48MP, f/1.79, 1/2" Sony IMX582, 0.80µm pixels50MP, f/1.8, 0.64µm pixelsTCL 50 SE has slightly higher resolution. Poco X3 Pro has a larger sensor and wider aperture, which should lead to better low-light performance.
Front Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.2, 1/3.4" Samsung S5K3T2, 0.80µm pixels8MP, f/2.0, 1.12µm pixelsXiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a higher resolution selfie camera with a smaller sensor, while the TCL 50 SE has a wider aperture and larger pixel size, which should lead to better low light pictures.
Wide Angle lens8MP, f/2.2NonePoco X3 Pro offers a wider field of view which can capture more of a scene in a photo
Portrait mode (depth)2MP, f/2.4NoneXiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a dedicated depth sensor, which should lead to more effective and accurate background blur in portrait mode.
Macro lens2MP, f/2.4, 1.75µm pixels2MP, f/2.4, 1.75µm pixelsBoth have a dedicated macro sensor for close-up photography.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fps with EIS1080p@30fpsXiaomi Poco X3 Pro offers much better video recording options including 4k, 1080p @ 120 and 240 fps, while TCL 50 SE only offers 1080p @30fps, for higher-quality video and more options.
Camera Features4K Video, Quadruple camera, Digital image stabilization, Manual focus, and other basic settingsDual camera, PDAF, and other basic settingsThe Poco X3 Pro offers a greater range of shooting options and more control over the camera, while the TCL 50 SE has PDAF for quicker focusing.

Battery

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 ProTCL 50 SEPractical Impact
Capacity5160mAh5010mAhBoth have similar battery capacity, which suggests comparable all day battery life depending on usage.
Charging33W Fast Charging33W Fast ChargingBoth support fast charging, meaning both will charge quicker, reducing waiting times.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 860 chipset provides significantly faster processing, better for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps.
  • Smoother Display: The 120Hz refresh rate offers a much smoother and more responsive experience.
  • Advanced Camera System: The Poco X3 Pro has a more versatile camera system with a wide-angle lens, depth sensor, 4K video recording, and more manual controls.
  • Hi-Res Audio: Enhanced audio quality with Hi-Res Audio for better music and video playback.
  • Better build quality: Corning Gorilla Glass 6 protects the display more.

Practical Implications: The Poco X3 Pro is the better phone for users who prioritize performance, gaming, and advanced photography features. It handles demanding tasks with much greater ease.

TCL 50 SE Advantages:

  • Brighter Display: The 900 nits brightness offers much better visibility in bright sunlight, which enhances usability in outdoor environments.
  • Lighter Build: A lighter phone is more comfortable for extended use and carrying around.
  • Newer Software: Comes with Android 14 out of the box and has newer Bluetooth version.
  • Better selfie camera sensor: Offers bigger pixel size, leading to better low-light images with the selfie camera.

Practical Implications: The TCL 50 SE is better suited for users who prioritize a lightweight device, outdoor visibility, and a newer software experience.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • The Poco X3 Pro trades a thicker, heavier design, and potentially lower outdoor visibility for significantly more performance and an enhanced camera system.
  • The TCL 50 SE trades performance, a versatile camera system and audio fidelity for a lighter build, brighter display, and newer software.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro:

  • Ideal User: Gamers, power users, photography enthusiasts, and those who value smooth performance and are less concerned with weight or a slightly bulkier build.
  • Use Cases:
    • Mobile Gaming: Runs demanding games smoothly with high frame rates.
    • Video Editing: Handles video editing and rendering tasks better due to processing power.
    • Photography: Versatile camera setup for diverse shooting scenarios.
    • Multitasking: Handles heavy multitasking with better speed and efficiency.

TCL 50 SE:

  • Ideal User: Everyday users who prioritize a lightweight phone with a bright display for outdoor use, and the latest Android version. It's suitable for users who aren't heavy gamers or doing demanding tasks on their phone.
  • Use Cases:
    • Outdoor Use: High screen brightness for good visibility in bright sunlight.
    • Everyday Tasks: Browsing, social media, and general app use.
    • Media Consumption: Watching videos and movies, thanks to the slightly larger display.
    • Longer Use: More comfortable for extended use due to lighter build.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • Given its higher performance and more advanced camera system, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro offers better value for users needing that performance and functionality.
  • The TCL 50 SE offers a modern phone with a bright display for everyday use at a potentially lower price.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Do you prioritize performance and gaming? If yes, the Poco X3 Pro is the better option.
  2. Do you frequently use your phone in bright outdoor conditions? If yes, the TCL 50 SE is the better option.
  3. Is having a lightweight device more important than high performance? If yes, the TCL 50 SE is better.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: User plays mobile games, edits videos, or uses demanding apps often. Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
  • Scenario 2: User primarily uses social media, browses the web, watches videos, and needs better outdoor visibility. Recommendation: TCL 50 SE
  • Scenario 3: User wants a high performing phone for as cheap as possible without sacrificing much. Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro

My Choice

If I had to choose, I would pick the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro. While the TCL 50 SE has a few advantages like a brighter screen for outdoor visibility and a newer software experience, the sheer performance difference offered by the Snapdragon 860 is too significant to ignore. As someone who values fast and smooth performance, it would be a better choice. The better camera system with 4K capabilities and added manual controls makes it the ideal option for me. The extra features and enhanced audio quality would be useful for me. While the weight may be a bit heavier, the overall benefits of superior performance and an advanced camera outweigh the disadvantages. For me, the main use would be gaming, recording, and some video editing, all of which the X3 Pro is much better at.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.