Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Motorola Moto G51 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 24, 2021 December 16, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 119.33 cm³ 118.69 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.1 "/g 3.27 "/g
Weight 215 g 208 g
Height 165.3 mm 170.5 mm
Width 76.8 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Phantom Black
  • Frost Blue
  • Metal Bronze
  • Indigo Blue
  • Bright Silver
  • Aqua Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.8 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 387 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 108.13 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.24 mAh/cm³ 42.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)
GPU Adreno 640 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 12 12

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 ProMotorola Moto G51 5GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm, 215g170.5 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm, 208gG51 is slightly taller and lighter, X3 Pro is a bit thicker; Minor differences, may affect single-handed use slightly.
Display
Size6.67"6.8"G51 has a slightly larger screen for a more immersive viewing experience.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Identical sharpness on both screens for standard use, video, and reading.
PPI395387Virtually identical pixel density, no visible difference in sharpness.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use LCD, meaning similar color reproduction and viewing angles.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth have the same peak brightness. It is not clear what it means, because 0 nits is not a valid value.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)X3 Pro has a much more powerful processor for intensive tasks, gaming, and faster app loading.
AnTuTu Score627,869381,000X3 Pro offers significantly better overall performance, about 65% higher in benchmarks.
GPUAdreno 640Adreno 619X3 Pro has a much more capable GPU, better for gaming and graphics-intensive applications.
Battery
Capacity5160mAh5000mAhBoth have comparable battery sizes, expect similar battery life for typical use.
Charging33W Fast Charging, Li-Polymer10W Fast Charging, Li-IonX3 Pro charges significantly faster (33W vs 10W), less time plugged in for the same usage.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.79, 1/2" sensor50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76" sensorG51 has slightly higher resolution, X3 Pro has a larger sensor with wider aperture for better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.2, 1/3.4" sensor13MP, f/2.2, unknown sensor sizeX3 Pro has higher resolution for sharper selfies.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.2, 1/4" sensor8MP, unknown sensor sizeBoth have comparable wide-angle cameras.
Depth Sensor2MP, f/2.4, 1/5" sensorNoneX3 Pro has a dedicated depth sensor for better portrait mode.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4, 1/5" sensor2MP, unknown sensor sizeBoth have macro lenses, but likely of similar quality.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fps with EISUp to 1080p@60fpsX3 Pro can record in 4k while G51 is capped to 1080p. X3 Pro has more options for high speed recording
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 12)Android 11 (upgradable to 12)Both have the same initial OS and same upgrade path.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11ac, MIMO802.11acBoth have similar WiFi but X3 Pro has MIMO for potentially better signal.
Bluetooth5.0, Apt-X, LDAC, SBC, AAC5.1G51 has a newer version, X3 Pro has better audio codec support.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, GalileoBoth support various GPS technologies. G51 includes SUPL.
Storage
Internal128GB or 256GB64GB or 128GBX3 Pro offers more internal storage.
RAM6GB or 8GB4GB or 8GBBoth can have up to 8GB of RAM, but X3 Pro has a 6 GB variant while G51 has 4 GB.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone supports expandable storage.
Audio
QualityHi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, 2 microphonesX3 Pro provides richer sound, G51 has better audio recording
Security
FingerprintSide-mounted sensorSide-mounted sensorBoth have the same basic fingerprint sensor.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 6UnknownX3 Pro has superior screen protection.
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic Proximity VirtualFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, GyroscopeX3 Pro has compass and virtual proximity sensor. G51 has a basic proximity sensor.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly Higher Performance: The Snapdragon 860 chipset provides superior processing power, leading to faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The AnTuTu score difference is substantial (627,869 vs 381,000).
  • Better Graphics: The Adreno 640 GPU excels in graphics-intensive applications, making it a better choice for gamers.
  • Faster Charging: 33W fast charging allows for a much quicker battery replenishment compared to the 10W charging of the Moto G51.
  • Better Main Camera: larger sensor size with wider aperture for better low-light shots
  • Better Video Recording: Supports 4k recording, while the G51 is capped at 1080p
  • Better Selfie Camera: Higher resolution for sharper selfies.
  • More Storage: Available in 256 GB configuration.
  • Better Audio: Hi-Res audio and stereo speakers provide a richer audio experience.
  • Better Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 6 provides better scratch and drop protection for the screen.
  • More Sensors: Includes compass and virtual proximity sensor.

Motorola Moto G51 5G Advantages:

  • Slightly Larger Display: The 6.8" screen provides a slightly more immersive viewing experience, good for media consumption.
  • Newer Bluetooth: Bluetooth 5.1 is slightly newer than 5.0.
  • SUPL for GPS: Motorola G51 has SUPL support for GPS, which can lead to faster location acquisition.
  • Potentially Better Audio Recording: Dolby Atmos and dual microphones could provide slightly better quality in recording situations.

Trade-offs:

  • The X3 Pro's performance advantage comes at the cost of being slightly thicker and heavier.
  • While the Moto G51 has a newer Bluetooth version, the Poco X3 Pro supports more audio codecs.
  • The G51's larger screen might be preferable for media, while X3 Pro is better for gaming and heavy use.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro Ideal Users:

  • Gamers: The superior chipset and GPU make it suitable for demanding mobile games.
  • Power Users: Individuals who frequently multitask and need fast performance for demanding apps.
  • Multimedia Creators: The 4k video capability and better camera can satisfy people who often capture videos and photos.
  • Users who value fast charging: People who need their phones charged quickly.

Motorola Moto G51 5G Ideal Users:

  • Casual Users: Those who prioritize a large display for media consumption and general use.
  • Budget-Conscious Buyers: May offer a better price-to-value for basic needs.
  • Users who value battery life: People who want a basic phone that can last a day and dont need advanced performance or fast charging.
  • Users who take more audio recording: The phone has features that enable better audio recording than X3 Pro.

Specific Use Cases:

  • X3 Pro: Excels in mobile gaming, video editing, resource-intensive apps, and fast charging on-the-go.
  • G51: Suitable for watching movies, browsing, casual social media, and basic productivity tasks, especially for the casual user who need good audio recording.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is performance? (Gaming, multitasking, etc.) - if performance is a high priority, go with the X3 Pro.
  2. What are your typical use-cases? (Casual use, media consumption, content creation, etc) - If you are mostly using your phone for casual browsing, the G51 will be fine, but for more advanced use-cases go with the X3 Pro.
  3. Are you a casual user or a heavy user? (Battery usage, how often to recharge) - If you are casual, the G51 may be better but if you are a heavy user, the better specs and better charging of the X3 Pro are better.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1 (Budget Gamer): If you want the best possible gaming performance on a budget, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the better option due to its powerful chipset, GPU, and 120Hz display.
  • Scenario 2 (Media Consumer): If you mostly watch videos and browse, the Motorola Moto G51 5G offers a larger display, which some may prefer.
  • Scenario 3 (Photo Enthusiast): The X3 Pro excels in video recording with 4k recording support, but the G51 doesn't. However, both have comparable photo features.
  • Scenario 4 (Heavy User on the Go): If you are always on the go and need fast charging, the X3 Pro’s 33W charging is a major advantage over the G51’s 10W.

Personal Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro. While the Motorola G51 has a slightly larger screen and newer Bluetooth, the performance difference is too significant to ignore. I value performance and fast charging, both of which the X3 Pro provides in spades. The improved video capabilities, richer audio, and superior screen protection all make it a more complete package. Although I am not a heavy gamer, I like to have a device that doesn't lag when multitasking, and the Snapdragon 860 chipset will provide a much better experience, plus I prefer the 4k video recording that is absent on the G51. The slightly thicker body is a trade-off I'm willing to make for the power and features.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.