1. Specifications Comparison
Design
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 165.3 × 76.8 × 9.4 mm | 164.1 × 75.8 × 8.6 mm | Poco X3 NFC is slightly larger and thicker, potentially less comfortable for one-handed use. The Blade A75 4G is slimmer and more pocketable. |
| Weight | 215g | 189g | Blade A75 4G is noticeably lighter, making it easier to hold for extended periods and carry around. |
| Build Quality (Screen Protection) | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | Poco X3 NFC offers better screen protection against scratches and accidental drops. |
Display
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.67" | 6.6" | Negligible difference in screen size for most users. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1612 | Poco X3 NFC has a significantly sharper and more detailed display, better for viewing photos, videos, and text. |
| PPI | 395 | 267 | The higher pixel density on the Poco X3 NFC results in a noticeably clearer and less pixelated image. |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 90Hz | Poco X3 NFC offers smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the overall user experience, especially in gaming and fast-paced apps. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both phones have identical peak brightness at 0 nits. This is unexpected as it is unlikely that the peak brightness is actually 0. |
Performance
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150-AC Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Poco X3 NFC's Snapdragon 732G offers significantly better performance for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and multitasking. |
| AnTuTu Score | 328,145 | 240,000 | The higher AnTuTu score indicates that the Poco X3 NFC will provide a smoother and more responsive experience overall. |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G57 MP1 | Poco X3 NFC's Adreno 618 is a more powerful GPU, resulting in better graphics performance in games and other visually intensive applications. |
| RAM | 6GB or 8GB | 4GB or 8GB | More RAM allows for smoother multitasking and less app reloading. Both offer an 8GB variant. |
Camera
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Camera Resolution | 64MP | 50MP | Poco X3 NFC captures more detailed photos, especially in well-lit conditions. |
| Main Camera Aperture | f/1.89 | f/1.8 | ZTE Blade A75 4G slightly better in low light. |
| Selfie Camera Resolution | 20MP | 8MP | Poco X3 NFC takes significantly sharper and more detailed selfies. |
| Wide Angle Lens | Yes (13MP) | No | Poco X3 NFC allows for capturing wider scenes, such as landscapes or group photos. |
| Macro Lens | Yes (2MP) | No | Poco X3 NFC can take close-up shots of small objects. |
| Depth Sensor | Yes (2MP) | No | Poco X3 NFC can create better portrait mode photos with a blurred background. |
| Video Recording | Up to 4K@30fps | Up to 1080p@30fps | Poco X3 NFC allows for recording higher-resolution videos with more detail. |
Battery
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5160mAh | 5000mAh | Similar battery capacity, suggesting comparable battery life. |
| Charging | 33W Fast Charging | 22.5W Fast Charging | Poco X3 NFC charges faster, reducing downtime. |
Storage
| Feature | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Internal Storage | 64GB/128GB | 128GB/256GB | ZTE offers up to 256 GB of storage, allowing more space for photos, videos, and apps. |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone allows for expanding storage with a microSD card. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Advantages:
- Significantly better performance: Snapdragon 732G chipset offers superior processing power and graphics performance compared to the Unisoc T606.
- Sharper and smoother display: Higher resolution, pixel density, and refresh rate provide a more enjoyable viewing experience.
- More versatile camera system: Includes wide-angle, macro, and depth sensors for greater creative flexibility.
- Faster charging: 33W charging allows for quicker battery top-ups.
- Better Bluetooth: Offers a newer Bluetooth version.
Practical Implications:
- The Poco X3 NFC is better for gaming, video editing, and multitasking.
- Its display is more suitable for watching videos and viewing high-resolution content.
- The camera system offers more options for different shooting scenarios.
ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:
- Lighter and slimmer design: More comfortable for extended use and easier to carry.
- Potentially lower price (unconfirmed): May offer better value for budget-conscious users.
- Newer Android Version: Comes with Android 13 out of the box.
- Larger internal storage option: 256 GB variant available.
Practical Implications:
- The Blade A75 4G is more comfortable to hold and carry.
- May be a more affordable option for basic smartphone use.
- Potentially longer software support due to newer Android.
Significant Trade-offs:
- Choosing the ZTE Blade A75 4G means sacrificing significant performance, display quality, and camera versatility for a lighter design and possibly a lower price.
- Choosing the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC means a heavier phone and older android version.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC - Ideal User:
- Gamers: The more powerful processor and GPU provide a better gaming experience.
- Photography enthusiasts: The versatile camera system offers more creative options.
- Media consumers: The higher-resolution display and faster processor are better for watching videos and browsing the web.
- Users who value performance: Prioritize speed and responsiveness for multitasking and demanding apps.
Specific Use Cases:
- Playing graphically intensive mobile games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty: Mobile.
- Taking high-quality photos and videos in various scenarios, including landscapes, portraits, and close-ups.
- Watching movies and TV shows on the go with a sharper and smoother display.
ZTE Blade A75 4G - Ideal User:
- Budget-conscious users: Seeking an affordable smartphone for basic tasks.
- Users who prioritize portability: Prefer a lighter and slimmer phone that is easy to carry.
- Users needing lots of space: Value the 256 GB of internal storage.
Specific Use Cases:
- Making phone calls, sending text messages, and browsing the web.
- Using social media apps like Facebook and Instagram.
- Taking occasional photos and videos for personal use.
- Users needing to store lots of data on device.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- The Poco X3 NFC generally offers a better price-to-value ratio if performance and display quality are important.
- The ZTE Blade A75 4G might be more appealing if the primary concern is budget and portability.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is your budget? The ZTE Blade A75 4G is likely cheaper.
- How important is performance and display quality? The Poco X3 NFC is significantly better in these areas.
- Do you need a versatile camera system? The Poco X3 NFC offers more features and better image quality.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Gaming on a budget. Choose the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC for its superior processing power and smoother display.
- Scenario 2: Basic smartphone use with maximum portability. Choose the ZTE Blade A75 4G for its lighter and slimmer design.
- Scenario 3: Photography and video recording are a priority. Choose the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC for its versatile camera system and 4K video recording.
- Scenario 4: Needing lots of on-device storage: Choose the ZTE Blade A75 4G for its 256GB option.
My Choice
I would choose the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. While the ZTE Blade A75 4G has a more modern Android version and is lighter, the Poco X3 NFC offers a vastly superior user experience in almost every other aspect. The improved performance is crucial for a smooth and responsive phone, and the significantly better display makes content consumption much more enjoyable. The camera versatility is also a major plus. For me, the trade-off in weight is acceptable given the performance benefits.
