Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC vs Samsung Galaxy M53 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 8, 2020 April 22, 2022
Release Year 2020 2022

Physical

Volume 119.33 cm³ 93.85 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.1 "/g 3.81 "/g
Weight 215 g 176 g
Height 165.3 mm 164.7 mm
Width 76.8 mm 77 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Shadow Gray
  • Blue
  • Green
  • Brown

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.24 mAh/cm³ 53.28 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7150-AC Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 618 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 12
Maximum OS Version 12 13

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC vs. Samsung Galaxy M53

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy M53Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions165.3 × 76.8 × 9.4 mm, 215g164.7 × 77 × 7.4 mm, 176gThe Galaxy M53 is noticeably thinner and lighter, making it more pocketable and comfortable for prolonged use.
Build QualityCorning Gorilla Glass 5 (screen)Unknown (screen)The Poco X3 NFC has confirmed screen protection. The M53's screen protection is unknown, potentially increasing the risk of scratches and cracks.
Display
Size6.67"6.7"Negligible difference in size.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDAMOLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better battery life with dark themes.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and gaming experiences.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8 nm)MediaTek Dimensity 900 (6 nm)The Dimensity 900 offers significantly better performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing.
AnTuTu Score328,145500,100Confirms the Dimensity 900's superior performance, resulting in snappier overall experience.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.89, 1/1.7", Sony IMX682108MP, f/1.8, 1/1.67", Samsung HM6The Galaxy M53's 108MP sensor captures more detail and performs better in low light.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.232MP, f/2.2The Galaxy M53's higher resolution selfie camera will produce more detailed and sharper selfies.
Ultrawide Camera13MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2The Poco X3 NFC's ultrawide camera captures more detailed landscape and group photos.
VideoUp to 4K@30fps, EISUp to 4K@30fpsBoth phones allow for high-quality video recording with stabilization, but the Poco X3 NFC supports a higher slow-motion framerate.
Battery
Capacity5160mAh5000mAhSimilar battery life for both phones.
Charging33W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingThe Poco X3 NFC charges faster.
Software
OSAndroid 10 (upgradable to 12)Android 12 (upgradable to 13)The Galaxy M53 has a more up-to-date Android version and potentially longer software support.
Storage
Internal Storage64GB/128GB128GB/256GBThe Galaxy M53 offers a higher maximum storage option, useful for users who store many large files or install many apps.
Expandable StorageNoNoNo option to expand storage, so choose the internal storage option accordingly.
Audio
Audio FeaturesStereo Speakers, Noise Cancellation MicStereo Speakers, Dolby AtmosThe Poco X3 NFC provides better voice call quality due to noise cancellation, while the Galaxy M53 has better multimedia audio due to Dolby Atmos.
Connectivity
Bluetooth5.15.2Newer Bluetooth version on the Galaxy M53 offers slightly improved efficiency and features.
Wi-FiWi-Fi MiMO-The Poco X3 NFC has better Wi-Fi signal strength.
Sensors
SensorsCompass, Ultrasonic proximity virtualProximity, GeomagneticThe Poco X3 NFC offers a compass for navigation and the Galaxy M53 provides more accurate proximity readings with it's proximity sensor.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Advantages:

  • Price: Generally more affordable.
  • Faster Charging: 33W vs 25W.
  • Slightly Larger Battery: 5160mAh vs 5000mAh.
  • Confirmed Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5.
  • Ultrawide Camera: Higher resolution ultrawide camera for more detailed landscape shots.
  • Audio Features: Features a noise cancellation mic, providing slightly better call quality.
  • Wi-Fi MiMO: Features Wi-Fi MiMO, providing better Wi-Fi signal strength.
  • Additional Sensors: Features compass and ultrasonic proximity virtual.

Samsung Galaxy M53 Advantages:

  • Performance: Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 900).
  • Display: Superior AMOLED display technology.
  • Main Camera: Higher resolution main sensor (108MP).
  • Selfie Camera: Higher resolution selfie camera (32MP).
  • Software: Newer Android version with potentially longer support.
  • Storage: Higher maximum internal storage option (256GB).
  • Weight: Lighter and Thinner design
  • Audio Features: Features Dolby Atmos, providing better audio quality.
  • Newer Bluetooth Version: Provides improved efficiency and features.
  • Additional Sensors: Features proximity and geomagnetic sensor.

Trade-offs:

  • Choosing the Poco X3 NFC means sacrificing performance and display quality for a lower price, faster charging, and a higher resolution ultrawide camera.
  • Choosing the Galaxy M53 means paying more for better performance, a superior display, and a higher resolution main camera, while accepting slower charging and unknown screen protection.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

  • Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC:
    • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life, faster charging, and are less demanding in terms of performance and display quality.
    • Use Cases: Daily use, social media browsing, photography in well-lit conditions, phone calls.
  • Samsung Galaxy M53:
    • Ideal User: Users who prioritize performance, display quality, and camera capabilities, and are willing to pay more.
    • Use Cases: Gaming, video streaming, photography in various conditions, demanding applications, video calls.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is my budget? The Poco X3 NFC is likely more affordable.
  2. How important is performance? The Galaxy M53 is significantly faster.
  3. How important is display quality? The Galaxy M53's AMOLED display is superior.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget is tight, and performance is not critical. Choose the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC.
  • Scenario 2: Performance and display quality are paramount, and budget is flexible. Choose the Samsung Galaxy M53.
  • Scenario 3: Balanced needs with a moderate budget. Evaluate if the performance and display improvements of the Galaxy M53 justify the price difference.

My Choice

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M53.

Reasoning: While the Poco X3 NFC offers a compelling value proposition, the superior performance of the Dimensity 900 chipset in the Galaxy M53 is a significant advantage. I frequently use my phone for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and multitasking, where the extra processing power will be noticeable. Additionally, the AMOLED display on the M53 provides a much more enjoyable viewing experience for media consumption and everyday use, even if the screen protection is unknown. The 108MP camera would give me the best photographs. I'm willing to pay a bit more for a significantly better and complete overall experience. While the faster charging on the Poco X3 NFC is nice, it isn't a dealbreaker as long as the battery life is decent.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.