Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC vs Samsung Galaxy A52 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 8, 2020 March 26, 2021
Release Year 2020 2021

Physical

Volume 119.33 cm³ 100.87 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.1 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 215 g 189 g
Height 165.3 mm 159.9 mm
Width 76.8 mm 75.1 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Shadow Gray
  • Awesome Black
  • Awesome White
  • Awesome Blue
  • Awesome Violet

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 407 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 106.51 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.24 mAh/cm³ 44.61 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7150-AC Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver)
GPU Adreno 618 Adreno 618

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 11
Maximum OS Version 12 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy A52Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions165.3 × 76.8 × 9.4 mm, 215g159.9 × 75.1 × 8.4 mm, 189gA52 is more pocketable and comfortable to hold for extended periods due to its lighter weight and smaller size.
BuildGorilla Glass 5 frontGorilla Glass 5 frontBoth offer decent scratch resistance.
Display
Size6.67"6.5"Slightly larger screen on the X3 NFC offers a more immersive viewing experience, but it's a marginal difference.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDA52's AMOLED provides more vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and better contrast, enhancing the visual experience, especially for multimedia.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both offer the same sharpness.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzX3 NFC has slightly smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsIdentical brightness; however, these values seem incorrect. Further investigation is needed to determine accurate brightness levels.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 732G (8 nm)Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)Similar performance. Both are suitable for everyday tasks and moderate gaming.
AnTuTu Score328,145341,212Negligible performance difference in real-world use.
GPUAdreno 618Adreno 618Identical gaming performance.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.8964MP, f/1.8Similar main camera performance in good lighting conditions; slightly better low light performance on the A52 due to the wider aperture.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.232MP, f/2.2A52 should capture more detailed selfies.
Wide Angle13MP, f/2.212MP, f/2.2Similar performance; differences are minor.
VideoUp to 4K@30fps, EISUp to 4K@30fps, EIS, OISA52's OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) results in smoother, less shaky videos, especially in low light.
Battery
Capacity5160mAh4500mAhX3 NFC offers longer battery life, especially with heavy usage.
Charging33W25WX3 NFC charges faster.
Software
OSAndroid 10, upgradable to 12Android 11, upgradable to 14A52 has a newer OS and longer software support, receiving updates for a longer period.
Storage
Internal64/128 GB128/256 GBA52 offers more storage options, beneficial for users with large media libraries.
ExpandableNoNoBoth have limited storage options if you need more than the available internal storage.
Other
AudioStereo SpeakersStereo Speakers, Dolby AtmosA52's Dolby Atmos provides a richer, more immersive audio experience.
SecuritySide-mounted fingerprintBasic fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensor on X3 NFC is often faster and more convenient for unlocking.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: Provides significantly longer battery life.
  • Faster Charging: Charges the battery more quickly.
  • Higher Refresh Rate: Offers slightly smoother scrolling and animations.
  • Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Generally faster and more convenient.
  • Wi-Fi MiMO: Better Wi-Fi performance.

Practical Implications: The X3 NFC is better for users who prioritize battery life, faster charging, and a smoother display on a budget.

Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:

  • AMOLED Display: Offers superior color accuracy, deeper blacks, and better contrast.
  • Optical Image Stabilization (OIS): Improves video recording quality, especially in low light.
  • Better Software Support: Will receive updates for a longer period.
  • More Storage Options: Offers a 256GB variant, catering to users with large media collections.
  • Dolby Atmos: Provides a richer audio experience.
  • Lighter and more Compact: Easier to pocket and hold.

Practical Implications: The A52 is better for users who value display quality, camera capabilities, software support, and a more premium feel.

Trade-offs:

  • X3 NFC: Sacrifices display quality and camera features for longer battery life and faster charging.
  • A52: Sacrifices battery life and charging speed for a better display and camera.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users: Looking for maximum value for their money.
  • Power users: Who need long battery life and fast charging.
  • Gamers: Who appreciate a smooth display.

Use Cases:

  • All-day use without needing to charge: Ideal for travel or long workdays.
  • Mobile gaming: The 120Hz display provides a smoother gaming experience.

Samsung Galaxy A52 Ideal User:

  • Multimedia consumers: Who prioritize display quality for watching videos and browsing photos.
  • Social media enthusiasts: Who want a good camera for taking photos and videos.
  • Users who value software support: Wanting to receive the latest Android updates and security patches.

Use Cases:

  • Taking high-quality photos and videos: The OIS helps capture stable footage.
  • Watching movies and TV shows: The AMOLED display offers a vibrant and immersive viewing experience.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. How important is battery life to you? If you need a phone that lasts all day, the X3 NFC is the better choice.
  2. How important is display quality and camera performance? If you prioritize these, the A52 is the better option.
  3. How important is long-term software support? The A52 will receive updates for a longer period.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: You need a phone for work that lasts all day.
    • Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC due to its superior battery life.
  • Scenario 2: You want to take high-quality photos and videos for social media.
    • Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A52 due to its better camera with OIS and higher resolution selfie camera.
  • Scenario 3: You are on a tight budget and want the best value for your money.
    • Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC due to its competitive features at a lower price point.
  • Scenario 4: You like watching videos and want the best possible display quality.
    • Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A52 due to its vibrant AMOLED display.

My Choice

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A52. While the Poco X3 NFC offers a larger battery and faster charging, the advantages of the A52's AMOLED display, OIS in the camera, and longer software support outweigh those benefits for my personal usage. I heavily consume media on my phone, so the superior display is a significant advantage. Additionally, having a camera with OIS is crucial for capturing clear photos and videos, especially in less-than-ideal lighting conditions. The longer software support ensures that the phone remains secure and up-to-date for a longer period.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.