Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 8, 2020 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2020 2024

Physical

Volume 119.33 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.1 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 215 g 209 g
Height 165.3 mm 161.7 mm
Width 76.8 mm 78 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Shadow Gray
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.24 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7150-AC Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 618 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 14
Maximum OS Version 12 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy A35Practical Impact
Dimensions165.3 × 76.8 × 9.4 mm161.7 × 78 × 8.2 mmPoco X3 NFC is taller and thicker, potentially feeling bulkier in hand and pocket. A35 is slightly wider.
Weight215g209gNegligible difference in weight, unlikely to be noticeable.
Build Quality (Screen Protection)Corning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass VictusGalaxy A35 has superior screen protection, offering better resistance to scratches and drops.

Display

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy A35Practical Impact
Size6.67"6.6"Minimal size difference; almost identical viewing experience.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDGalaxy A35's AMOLED screen delivers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better contrast, leading to a more immersive and vibrant visual experience.
Resolution1080x24001080x2340Virtually identical sharpness; both are Full HD+.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and gaming experiences.

Performance

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy A35Practical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)Galaxy A35's Exynos 1380 is significantly more powerful and efficient, offering faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score328,145578,500The Galaxy A35's higher score translates to noticeably snappier performance in everyday tasks and demanding applications.
GPUAdreno 618Mali-G68 MP5Galaxy A35's GPU delivers better graphics performance for gaming and video editing.

Camera

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy A35Practical Impact
Main Camera64MP, f/1.89, 1/1.7", Sony IMX68250MP, f/1.8, 1/1.96", Samsung GN8Poco X3 NFC boasts higher megapixel count, but A35 has a wider aperture, and OIS. Real-world image quality depends on software processing, but the A35 will likely perform better in low light.
Ultrawide Camera13MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2Poco X3 NFC captures more detailed ultrawide photos.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.213MP, f/2.2Poco X3 NFC produces higher resolution selfies.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fps (EIS)Up to 4K@30fps (EIS)Both offer 4K video recording, but the A35 has OIS for smoother videos.
Camera FeaturesQuad CameraTriple Camera, OIS, AutoFraming, RAW 12 bits, DOL HDRGalaxy A35 has OIS for better stabilization in videos and low-light photos, and more advanced features like AutoFraming and RAW capture.

Battery

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy A35Practical Impact
Capacity5160mAh5000mAhSimilar battery life; both should last a full day for most users.
Charging33W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingPoco X3 NFC charges faster, potentially saving time.

Software and Connectivity

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy A35Practical Impact
OSAndroid 10 (upgradable to 12)Android 14 (upgradable to 18)Galaxy A35 offers a much newer Android version with more features, security updates, and a longer software support lifespan.
WiFiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6Galaxy A35 supports faster and more efficient WiFi connectivity.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.1Bluetooth 5.3Galaxy A35 has a newer Bluetooth version with improved performance and features.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone allows for storage expansion.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Advantages:

  • Faster Charging: 33W charging is quicker than the A35's 25W.
  • Higher Resolution Ultrawide Camera: 13MP vs 8MP may capture more detail in ultrawide shots.

Practical Implications:

  • Faster charging can be convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
  • Higher resolution ultrawide offers more detail in those shots.

Samsung Galaxy A35 Advantages:

  • Significantly Faster Processor: The Exynos 1380 offers a substantial performance boost.
  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology provides a much better viewing experience.
  • Better Camera Features: OIS and advanced software features improve photo and video quality.
  • Newer Software: Android 14 offers a more modern and secure user experience with longer support.
  • Better Build Quality (Screen Protection): Gorilla Glass Victus provides superior protection.
  • More Storage Options: 128/256GB

Practical Implications:

  • A faster processor means smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming.
  • An AMOLED display results in a more vibrant and enjoyable visual experience.
  • OIS in the camera helps capture clearer photos and smoother videos, especially in low light.
  • Newer software ensures access to the latest features, security updates, and a longer lifespan.
  • Better screen protection reduces the risk of damage from drops and scratches.
  • More storage eliminates worries about running out of space for apps, photos, and videos.

Trade-offs:

  • The Galaxy A35 is more expensive than the Poco X3 NFC.
  • The Poco X3 NFC has slightly larger battery capacity, but battery life is likely similar due to the A35's more efficient processor.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users who prioritize value for money.
  • Users who don't require the absolute best performance or camera quality.
  • Users who want slightly faster charging.

Use Cases:

  • Basic everyday use (calls, texts, social media).
  • Casual gaming.
  • Users looking for a secondary device.

Samsung Galaxy A35 Ideal User:

  • Users who value performance, display quality, and camera capabilities.
  • Users who want a modern smartphone experience with the latest software and features.
  • Users who are willing to pay more for a premium experience.

Use Cases:

  • Demanding mobile gaming.
  • Photography and videography.
  • Heavy multitasking.
  • Users who consume a lot of video content.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco X3 NFC is significantly more affordable.
  2. How important is performance and display quality to you? The Galaxy A35 excels in these areas.
  3. How important are the latest software features and long-term support? The Galaxy A35 offers a much newer Android version with a longer support lifespan.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: If your budget is tight and you need a basic smartphone for everyday use, the Poco X3 NFC is a decent option.
  • Scenario 2: If you want a significantly better overall experience with a smoother performance, vibrant display, and better camera, the Samsung Galaxy A35 is worth the extra investment.
  • Scenario 3: If you prioritize photography and videography, the Galaxy A35's OIS and advanced camera features make it a better choice.

My Choice

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A35. While the Poco X3 NFC is a solid budget option, the Galaxy A35 offers a significantly better overall experience. The superior performance of the Exynos 1380, combined with the vibrant AMOLED display and the enhanced camera capabilities (especially with OIS), make it a much more enjoyable and versatile device for my daily use. The longer software support is also a major plus, ensuring the phone stays up-to-date with the latest features and security patches for years to come. Although it comes at a higher price point, the improvements in performance, display, camera, and software support justify the extra cost for me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.