Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC vs Samsung Galaxy A25 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 8, 2020 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2020 2023

Physical

Volume 119.33 cm³ 102.23 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.1 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 215 g 197 g
Height 165.3 mm 161 mm
Width 76.8 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Shadow Gray
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Personality Yellow
  • Fantasy Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 84.2 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.24 mAh/cm³ 48.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7150-AC Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 618 Mali-G68

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 14
Maximum OS Version 12 18

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC vs. Samsung Galaxy A25

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy A25Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions165.3 × 76.8 × 9.4 mm161 × 76.5 × 8.3 mmA25 is more pocketable due to being shorter and thinner.
Weight215g197gA25 is lighter, leading to more comfortable prolonged use.
Display
Size6.67"6.5"X3 NFC offers a slightly larger viewing area, better for media consumption.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDA25 has superior color reproduction, contrast, and potentially better battery life with dark themes.
Resolution1080x24001080x2340Negligible difference in sharpness.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smoother scrolling and gaming.
Brightness0 nits1000 nitsA25 is significantly more visible outdoors in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8 nm)Exynos 1280 (5 nm)A25 provides snappier performance and is more power-efficient for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing.
AnTuTu Score328,145480,688A25 will feel more responsive overall, especially in graphically intensive applications.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.8950MP, f/1.8X3 NFC captures slightly more detailed images in good lighting. A25 may perform slightly better in low light due to the wider aperture (although sensor size is unknown)
Ultrawide Camera13MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2X3 NFC captures wider scenes with more detail.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.213MP, f/2.2X3 NFC takes more detailed selfies.
Macro Camera2MP, f/2.4NoneX3 NFC allows for dedicated macro shots.
Video Recording4K@30fps (EIS)4K@30fps (EIS)Both record 4K video with stabilization.
Camera FeaturesQuad camera, Night ModeTriple camera, OIS, PDAFA25's OIS provides smoother videos and sharper low-light photos. X3 NFC's Night Mode potentially improves low-light performance (without OIS)
DxOMark ScoreN/A92A25 offers superior overall camera performance.
Battery
Capacity5160mAh5000mAhSimilar battery life.
Charging33W25WX3 NFC charges faster.
Software
OSAndroid 10 (up to 12)Android 14 (up to 18)A25 has a significantly newer OS and longer software support.
Connectivity
Bluetooth5.15.3A25 has a newer Bluetooth version for improved connectivity and efficiency.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoA25 offers slightly more accurate location tracking with QZSS.
Wi-FiWi-Fi MiMONoneX3 NFC has improved WiFi speed and reliablility
Storage
Internal64/128 GB128/256 GBA25 offers more internal storage options.
ExpandableNoNoNo expandable storage for both devices
Audio
FeaturesNoise cancellation microphone, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphonesDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersX3 NFC may offer slightly better call quality, while A25 provides an immersive audio experience with Dolby Atmos.
Other
Build QualityCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 5Both have similar screen protection.
SensorsCompassHall, GeomagneticA25 features sensors that can be utilized for industrial applications.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Advantages:

  • Slightly Larger Display: Better for media consumption.
  • Faster Charging: 33W charging gets you back up and running quicker.
  • Macro Lens: Dedicated macro camera offers more versatility in photography.
  • WiFi MiMO: Faster and more reliable wireless internet

Samsung Galaxy A25 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED offers significantly better viewing experience (contrast, colors, power efficiency).
  • Significantly Better Performance: Exynos 1280 chipset offers much better performance for gaming and demanding apps.
  • Better Camera System: OIS, PDAF, and a tested DxOMark score indicate a more capable camera overall.
  • Newer Software & Longer Support: Android 14 provides access to the latest features and security updates.
  • Lighter and More Compact Design: More pocketable and comfortable to hold.
  • Brighter Display: Much easier to see outdoors under sunlight.
  • More Internal Storage Options: Up to 256GB internal storage for storing more photos, videos, and apps.

Trade-offs:

  • X3 NFC has a slightly bigger battery, but the A25 may have better overall battery life due to its more efficient chipset and AMOLED display.
  • X3 NFC is older, with limited software update availability.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Ideal User:

  • Users on a very tight budget prioritizing a larger screen and faster charging.
  • Casual users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks and media consumption.
  • Users who don't require the latest software features or top-tier performance.

Use Cases:

  • Watching videos on YouTube or Netflix.
  • Browsing social media.
  • Basic gaming.

Samsung Galaxy A25 Ideal User:

  • Users who value display quality, performance, and camera capabilities.
  • Users who want a modern smartphone experience with the latest software features.
  • Users who need a reliable device for everyday use and occasional demanding tasks.

Use Cases:

  • Taking high-quality photos and videos.
  • Playing graphically intensive games.
  • Running multiple apps simultaneously.
  • Using the phone outdoors in bright sunlight.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. How important is display quality to you? (AMOLED vs. IPS LCD is a significant difference)
  2. How important is performance for gaming and demanding apps? (Exynos 1280 is a major upgrade)
  3. How important is future software support? (A25 will receive several more Android updates)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Budget-Conscious User Needing Basic Functionality: If the Poco X3 NFC is significantly cheaper and you only need basic functionality, it might suffice. However, the A25 provides a much better value.
  • Performance and Camera Enthusiast: The Samsung Galaxy A25 is the clear winner due to its superior chipset, optimized camera system, and OIS.
  • User Prioritizing Long-Term Software Support: The Samsung Galaxy A25 offers significantly longer software support.

My Choice

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A25.

Reasons:

While the Poco X3 NFC might be tempting due to its potentially lower price, the Galaxy A25 offers a much better overall experience. The AMOLED display is a game-changer for media consumption, and the Exynos 1280 provides a noticeable performance boost for everyday tasks and gaming. The improved camera system with OIS is crucial for capturing high-quality photos and videos. Finally, the promise of longer software support ensures that the phone will remain secure and up-to-date for years to come.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.