Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC vs Oppo Find X3 Neo - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 8, 2020 March 19, 2021
Release Year 2020 2021

Physical

Volume 119.33 cm³ 92.74 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.1 "/g 3.56 "/g
Weight 215 g 184 g
Height 165.3 mm 159.9 mm
Width 76.8 mm 72.5 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Shadow Gray
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.55 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 89.3 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1100 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 104.89 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.24 mAh/cm³ 48.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7150-AC Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 618 Adreno 650

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 11
Maximum OS Version 12 12

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC and the Oppo Find X3 Neo, focusing on the practical implications of their specifications:

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 NFCOppo Find X3 NeoPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions165.3 × 76.8 × 9.4 mm159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mmX3 Neo is more pocketable and comfortable for one-handed use. X3 NFC is bulkier.
Weight215g184gX3 Neo is lighter, reducing fatigue during extended use.
BuildGorilla Glass 5 FrontGorilla Glass 5 FrontBoth offer good screen protection against scratches and minor impacts.
Display
Size6.67"6.55"X3 NFC offers a slightly larger viewing area, potentially better for media consumption.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDX3 Neo's AMOLED provides richer colors, deeper blacks, and better contrast, enhancing the visual experience, especially for HDR content.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both offer the same level of sharpness.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzX3 NFC provides smoother scrolling and animations. The difference may not be noticeable for all users.
Brightness0 nits1100 nitsX3 Neo is significantly brighter, ensuring excellent visibility in direct sunlight. The X3 NFC brightness value is missing.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 732G (8 nm)Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)X3 Neo offers significantly faster processing speeds for demanding apps, gaming, and multitasking.
Antutu Score328,145743,500X3 Neo provides a smoother and more responsive experience overall.
GPUAdreno 618Adreno 650X3 Neo delivers superior graphics performance, essential for smooth gameplay at higher settings.
RAM6/8 GB12 GBX3 Neo handles multitasking with ease and keeps more apps open in the background without slowing down.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.8950MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" sensorX3 Neo's larger sensor and wider aperture can result in better low-light performance and dynamic range, despite lower megapixel count.
Selfie Camera20MP, f/2.232MP, f/2.4X3 Neo captures more detailed selfies with better clarity.
Telephoto LensNone13MP, f/2.4X3 Neo provides optical zoom capabilities, allowing for clearer zoomed-in photos compared to digital zoom on the X3 NFC.
Wide Angle Lens13MP, f/2.216MP, f/2.2X3 Neo has a slightly higher resolution.
Portrait mode (depth)2MP, f/2.4NoneX3 NFC has a dedicated depth sensor.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Similar macro capabilities.
Video4K@30fps, EIS4K@60fps, HDR, EISX3 Neo records smoother 4K videos and supports HDR for enhanced dynamic range.
DXOMarkN/A106X3 Neo has a significantly better camera.
Battery
Capacity5160mAh4500mAhX3 NFC potentially offers longer battery life on a single charge.
Charging33W65WX3 Neo charges much faster, minimizing downtime.
FeaturesMiddle Middle Tab TechnologyReverse chargingX3 Neo can be used to charge other devices.
Storage
Internal64/128 GB128/256 GBX3 Neo offers more storage space for apps, photos, and videos.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone allows for storage expansion.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6X3 Neo supports faster and more efficient Wi-Fi connections.
Bluetooth5.15.1Similar Bluetooth capabilities.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoX3 Neo offers slightly better GPS accuracy due to more supported satellite systems.
Software
OSAndroid 10 (upgradable to 12)Android 11 (upgradable to 12)X3 Neo starts with a newer Android version out of the box.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Advantages:

  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity (5160mAh vs 4500mAh) could translate to extended usage between charges.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: 120Hz provides smoother scrolling, although the real-world difference may not be noticeable to everyone.
  • Side-mounted fingerprint sensor: Some prefer side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
  • Lower price: It is cheaper, offering great value for money

Practical Implications: The Poco X3 NFC is suitable for users prioritizing battery life and those on a tighter budget.

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Snapdragon 865 5G offers significantly faster processing and graphics capabilities for demanding tasks.
  • Better Display Quality: AMOLED technology provides richer colors, deeper blacks, and higher brightness, improving the viewing experience.
  • Faster Charging: 65W charging replenishes the battery much faster.
  • Better Camera System: Larger sensor, wider aperture, telephoto lens, and 4K@60fps HDR video recording result in superior image and video quality.
  • More RAM and Storage: 12GB RAM and up to 256GB storage provide ample space and ensure smooth multitasking.
  • Lighter and More Compact Design: Easier to handle and carry around.
  • Wi-Fi 6 Support: Enables faster and more stable Wi-Fi connections.

Practical Implications: The Find X3 Neo is ideal for users who demand high performance, excellent camera quality, and a premium user experience.

Trade-offs:

  • Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC: Sacrifices performance, display quality, and camera capabilities for longer battery life and a lower price.
  • Oppo Find X3 Neo: Compromises slightly on battery capacity for significantly better performance and features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming.
  • Use Cases:
    • Students or individuals with limited budgets.
    • Users who need a phone that can last through a full day of moderate use.
    • Gamers who play less graphically intensive games.

Oppo Find X3 Neo:

  • Ideal User: Users who value performance, camera quality, and a premium experience.
  • Use Cases:
    • Photography enthusiasts who want to capture high-quality photos and videos.
    • Mobile gamers who play demanding titles and require smooth performance.
    • Professionals who need a fast and reliable device for multitasking and productivity.
    • Users who consume a lot of media and appreciate a vibrant display.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC: Offers excellent value for its price point, providing a decent overall experience for budget-conscious users.
  • Oppo Find X3 Neo: While more expensive, the Find X3 Neo justifies its price with superior performance, camera, and display quality.

4. Decision Framework

Here are three key questions for buyers to consider:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco X3 NFC is significantly cheaper, making it a better choice for budget-conscious buyers.
  2. What are your primary use cases? If you prioritize gaming, photography, and demanding applications, the Find X3 Neo is the clear winner. If you need a phone that lasts all day with moderate use, the Poco X3 NFC might suffice.
  3. How important is display quality and design to you? The Find X3 Neo's AMOLED display and more premium design offer a superior user experience.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: A student on a tight budget needs a reliable phone for classes, social media, and occasional gaming. Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC.
  • Scenario 2: A photographer wants a phone with a versatile camera system for capturing high-quality photos and videos. Recommendation: Oppo Find X3 Neo.
  • Scenario 3: A mobile gamer needs a phone that can handle demanding games without lag. Recommendation: Oppo Find X3 Neo.
  • Scenario 4: Someone needs a phone that lasts all day with moderate usage and doesn't want to spend a lot of money. Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC.

At the end, write what you would choose and explain why!

If I had to choose between the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC and the Oppo Find X3 Neo, I would pick the Oppo Find X3 Neo.

Here's why:

While the Poco X3 NFC offers good value for its price and has a larger battery, the Oppo Find X3 Neo provides a significantly better overall experience. The superior performance of the Snapdragon 865 5G chipset, coupled with the vibrant AMOLED display and a more versatile camera system, makes it a much more compelling choice for my personal use. As someone who values smooth performance in demanding apps and games, as well as capturing high-quality photos and videos, the Find X3 Neo's advantages outweigh the Poco X3 NFC's longer battery life. The faster charging is also a significant plus, allowing me to quickly top up the battery when needed. While the price is higher, the overall experience and capabilities of the Find X3 Neo justify the investment.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.