Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC vs Oppo A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A55
Oppo A55
Oppo

General

Launch Date September 8, 2020 October 1, 2021
Release Year 2020 2021

Physical

Volume 119.33 cm³ 104.03 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.1 "/g 3.37 "/g
Weight 215 g 193 g
Height 165.3 mm 163.6 mm
Width 76.8 mm 75.7 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Shadow Gray
  • Green
  • Starry Black
  • Rainbow Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.51 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.6 % 82.6 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness 450 nits 480 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 550 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.98 mAh/in² 117.98 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.24 mAh/cm³ 48.06 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5160 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7150-AC Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Adreno 618 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 11
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a comparison of the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC and Oppo A55, focusing on practical implications:

Feature CategoryFeatureXiaomi Poco X3 NFCOppo A55Practical Impact
DesignDimensions165.3 × 76.8 × 9.4 mm163.6 × 75.7 × 8.4 mmPoco X3 NFC is larger and thicker, potentially less comfortable for one-handed use. A55 is slimmer and lighter, making it more pocketable and easier to handle for longer periods.
Weight215g193gOppo A55 is noticeably lighter, which can be significant for daily comfort, especially during extended use.
DisplaySize6.67"6.51"Slightly larger screen on the Poco X3 NFC offers a more immersive viewing experience for media consumption and gaming.
Resolution1080x2400720x1600The Poco X3 NFC has a much sharper display (Full HD+) compared to the Oppo A55 (HD+). This translates to clearer text, more detailed images, and a better overall viewing experience.
PPI395270Higher pixel density on the Poco X3 NFC means significantly sharper images and text. Individual pixels are less noticeable, resulting in a smoother visual experience.
Refresh Rate120Hz60HzThe 120Hz refresh rate on the Poco X3 NFC makes scrolling and animations much smoother and more responsive, enhancing the user experience, especially in gaming and fast-paced apps.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsAssuming this is a data entry error, brightness is crucial for outdoor visibility. Without this info, it's hard to assess performance in sunlight.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth phones use the same display technology, IPS LCD.
PerformanceChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8 nm)MediaTek Helio G35 (12 nm)Snapdragon 732G in Poco X3 NFC is significantly more powerful, providing smoother performance in demanding apps and games. Helio G35 in A55 is adequate for basic tasks but may struggle with heavy multitasking and graphically intensive applications.
AnTuTu Score328,145379,800Oppo A55's higher AnTuTu score suggests slightly better benchmark performance.
GPUAdreno 618PowerVR GE8320The Adreno 618 GPU in the Poco X3 NFC offers superior graphics performance, resulting in smoother gameplay and better visual fidelity in games compared to the PowerVR GE8320 in the A55.
CameraMain Camera64MP (f/1.89)13MP (f/2.2)The Poco X3 NFC's 64MP sensor captures significantly more detail and performs better in low light due to its wider aperture. This results in sharper, more vibrant photos, especially in good lighting conditions.
Ultrawide Lens13MP (f/2.2)NonePoco X3 NFC's wide-angle lens lets you capture more of the scene in a single shot, ideal for landscapes and group photos. The A55 lacks this versatility.
Selfie Camera20MP (f/2.2)8MP (f/2.0)The Poco X3 NFC's 20MP front camera captures more detailed selfies, while the Oppo A55's f/2.0 aperture may offer slightly better low-light performance.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fpsUp to 1080p@30fpsThe Poco X3 NFC can record videos in 4K resolution, offering much higher quality and detail compared to the 1080p video recording on the Oppo A55.
BatteryCapacity5160mAh5000mAhBoth phones have similar battery capacities, so battery life should be comparable under similar usage conditions.
Charging33W Fast Charging10W Fast ChargingThe Poco X3 NFC charges much faster than the Oppo A55. This means significantly less time plugged into the wall and more time using your phone.
SoftwareOSAndroid 10 (Upgradable to 12)Android 11The Oppo A55 ships with a slightly newer version of Android, but the Poco X3 NFC can be upgraded.
ConnectivityWiFiWi-Fi MiMODual band, Wi-Fi Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi DisplayXiaomi Poco X3 NFC offers slightly better wireless connectivity with Wi-Fi MiMO.
BluetoothEDR, HIDLDAC, SBCDifferent Bluetooth specifications, Oppo A55 offers slightly better audio quality with LDAC, SBC
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoOppo A55 has better GPS with QZSS.
StorageInternal64GB/128GB128GBOppo A55 offers slightly better storage with 128GB.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone allows for expanding the storage.
AudioQualityStereo Speakers, Noise cancellation microphoneBasic audio featuresThe Poco X3 NFC offers a much better audio experience with stereo speakers and noise cancellation, making it ideal for media consumption and calls.
Build QualityScreen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5UnknownThe Poco X3 NFC has better protection against scratches and drops with Gorilla Glass 5, offering greater peace of mind.
SensorsSensorsCompass, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic proximity virtualProximity, Gravity, Geomagnetic, GyroscopeThe Poco X3 NFC has a more complete set of sensors that improve the overall device functionality.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Higher resolution (1080x2400) and 120Hz refresh rate offer a significantly smoother and more visually appealing experience.
  • More Powerful Processor: Snapdragon 732G provides better performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications.
  • Better Camera System: 64MP main camera, ultrawide lens, and 4K video recording offer greater versatility and image quality.
  • Faster Charging: 33W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • Enhanced Audio: Stereo speakers and noise cancellation microphone provide a better audio experience.
  • Better Build Quality: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 for screen protection.
  • Better Sensors: Better device functionality.

Oppo A55 Advantages:

  • Lighter and Slimmer Design: More comfortable for one-handed use and pocketability.
  • Marginally Better Benchmark performance: A slightly higher AnTuTu score.
  • Newer OS Out-of-Box: Ships with a slightly newer version of Android, but the Poco X3 NFC can be upgraded.
  • Better GPS: QZSS offers better GPS.
  • LDAC, SBC: Better Audio via bluetooth.

Trade-offs:

  • The Oppo A55 prioritizes portability and a slightly newer Android version, but sacrifices performance, display quality, camera capabilities, and fast charging.
  • The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC offers a much better overall experience in terms of performance, display, camera, and audio, but is bulkier and heavier.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC:

  • Ideal User: Gamers, multimedia enthusiasts, users who value performance, and photography enthusiasts on a budget.
  • Use Cases: Playing graphically intensive games, watching high-resolution videos, capturing detailed photos and videos, smooth scrolling and browsing, and extended use without frequent charging.

Oppo A55:

  • Ideal User: Users who prioritize a lightweight and slim design, basic smartphone functionality, and are less demanding in terms of performance and camera quality.
  • Use Cases: Basic communication (calls, messaging), light browsing, social media, and users who prefer a more pocketable device.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC generally offers a better price-to-value ratio due to its superior performance, display, and camera features. While prices vary, the X3 NFC typically provides more bang for your buck.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. How important is performance for gaming and demanding apps? If performance is crucial, the Poco X3 NFC is the clear winner.
  2. Do you prioritize portability and a lightweight design? If so, the Oppo A55 is a better choice.
  3. What is your budget and how much do you value camera quality and display sharpness? If you can afford it, the superior camera and display of the Poco X3 NFC are worth the investment.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Mobile Gamer on a Budget: Choose the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. Its Snapdragon 732G and 120Hz display provide a much better gaming experience.
  • Scenario 2: User Primarily Focused on Basic Communication and Portability: Choose the Oppo A55. Its lightweight design and basic functionality are sufficient for these needs.
  • Scenario 3: Photography Enthusiast on a Budget: Choose the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. Its 64MP camera and ultrawide lens offer greater versatility and image quality.

What I would choose and why:

I would choose the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. While the Oppo A55 has a slightly newer OS, the benefits of the Poco X3 NFC far outweigh this single advantage. The superior display quality, the more powerful processor, and the significantly better camera system make it a much better choice for my usage patterns. I frequently watch videos and browse social media, so the higher resolution and 120Hz refresh rate would be extremely beneficial. Also, since I occasionally play games on my phone, the Snapdragon 732G is a must.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.