Xiaomi Poco X3 GT vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 19, 2021 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 110.31 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 193 g 189 g
Height 163.3 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75.9 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cloud White
  • Stargaze Black
  • Wave Blue
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.33 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G77 MC9 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT and the ZTE Blade A75 4G. I've got my engineering hat on, and I'm ready to break down these specs into real-world experiences. Let's get started!

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 GTZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mmVery similar in size, but the Poco X3 GT is slightly thicker by 0.3mm, but this is not significant enough to change how the phone feels in the hand
Weight193g189gVirtually identical; both feel substantial but not overly heavy in hand.
Display
Size6.6"6.6"Same screen real estate; good for media consumption and daily tasks.
Resolution1080x2400720x1612Poco X3 GT has a significantly sharper display, which looks much clearer and detailed when viewing text, images and videos
Pixel Density (PPI)399267Poco X3 GT offers crisper visuals; text and images appear much sharper, while the ZTE screen might appear slightly blurred
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer good colour reproduction, wide viewing angles, but blacks will not be as inky as OLED screens.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzPoco X3 GT offers smoother scrolling and animations making the UI more fluid.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth have identical peak brightness, but we are missing the data. In theory, there won't be a major difference in outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)Poco X3 GT uses a much more powerful chipset built on a smaller process which translates to faster performance, better efficiency, and less heat build up.
AnTuTu Score745,283240,000Poco X3 GT is significantly faster, handles intensive games and multitasking with ease. The ZTE will struggle with the same tasks
GPUMali-G77 MC9Mali-G57 MP1Poco X3 GT offers better graphics performance, making it suitable for gaming and graphic intensive applications.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth offer similar battery capacity, suggesting comparable battery life
Charging67W fast charging22.5W fast chargingPoco X3 GT charges much faster, getting you back to full power more quickly.
RemovableNoNoBoth batteries are sealed within the device.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.79, 1/2" sensor, 0.7µm50MP, f/1.8,Poco X3 GT's higher resolution sensor, wider aperture, and larger pixels, should deliver better low light performance, and better quality photos
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.458MPPoco X3 GT should have higher-quality selfies.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, Slow-motion: 960 fps1080p@30fps, Slow-motion: 30 fpsPoco X3 GT offers higher video quality with 4K recording and more versatile slow-motion capabilities.
Camera Features4K Video, Triple camera, Ultra stable video, RAW, Night ModeDual camera, Phase detection autofocus (PDAF)Poco X3 GT has a more versatile camera system, especially for advanced users who shoot 4K and low light scenes, the ZTE camera is more basic
Software
OSAndroid 11Android 13ZTE Blade A75 4G runs a newer version of Android, and will most likely have support for longer.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)Poco X3 GT supports faster Wi-Fi 6, offering faster speeds.
Bluetooth5.2, APT-x, LDAC, AAC5.0Poco X3 GT has a newer version and supports high-quality audio codecs for better sound quality with compatible headphones.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, BeiDou (B1)GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoPoco X3 GT offers more accurate location tracking with support for additional satellite systems
SIMDual SIM, Nano SIMDual SIM, Nano SIMBoth allow for two SIM cards.
Storage
Internal Storage128GB/256GB128GB/256GBBoth are available in 128GB or 256GB options.
RAM8GB4GB or 8GBBoth available with 8GB, but the ZTE is also available in a base 4GB option, meaning it might struggle when multitasking
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersDTS / DTS XPoco X3 GT provides a more immersive audio experience, especially with stereo speakers and Dolby Atmos.
Security
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedSide-mountedBoth phones use side-mounted sensors.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass VictusUnknownPoco X3 GT offers superior screen protection
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic proximity virtualFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, GyroscopeXiaomi Poco X3 GT adds a compass and ultrasonic virtual proximity sensor

2. Key Insights

Xiaomi Poco X3 GT: Strengths and Competitive Advantages

  • Performance Powerhouse: The Dimensity 1100 chipset is a significant step above the Unisoc T606. This means noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a much better gaming experience.
  • Superior Display: The higher resolution and 120Hz refresh rate translate to a more enjoyable viewing experience with sharper visuals and smoother animations.
  • Advanced Camera System: With a 64MP main sensor, 4K video recording, and extra shooting modes, the Poco X3 GT is better suited for those who prioritize photography and videography.
  • Faster Charging: The 67W charging is a game-changer, getting you back to full power in a fraction of the time compared to the ZTE’s 22.5W.
  • Enhanced Audio: The combination of Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, and stereo speakers provides a richer and more immersive audio experience.
  • Robust Build: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus offers superior screen protection compared to the unknown protection on the ZTE.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Strengths and Competitive Advantages

  • Newer Android OS: Ships with Android 13 out of the box, which may mean longer support for the device in terms of software updates.
  • Potentially Lower Price Point: The ZTE's more basic specs will most likely translate to a lower price, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious consumers.

Trade-offs and Limitations

  • Poco X3 GT: No expandable storage might be limiting for some users.
  • ZTE Blade A75 4G: Struggles to keep up with the performance and features found on the Poco, especially in terms of gaming and camera performance. The 4GB option may also struggle when multitasking.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Xiaomi Poco X3 GT

  • Ideal for: Gamers, tech enthusiasts, content creators, or anyone who values fast performance, high-quality displays, and advanced camera features.
  • Use Cases: Playing demanding games, recording 4K videos, heavy multitasking, and general heavy usage.

ZTE Blade A75 4G

  • Ideal for: Budget-conscious users, basic smartphone users, or those who only need a phone for basic tasks such as browsing, calling, and casual social media.
  • Use Cases: Making phone calls, browsing social media, sending texts, casual photo capturing, and basic gaming.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions that can help users decide:

  1. How important is performance and speed? If you need a phone for gaming or heavy multitasking, the Poco X3 GT is the clear winner. If you need to carry out basic functions then the ZTE will be fine.
  2. How much do you value a high-quality display and camera? If sharp visuals and great camera are a priority, the Poco X3 GT is the better choice. If these are not a huge factor, then the ZTE may be sufficient.
  3. What's your budget? If price is the most important factor and your needs are not advanced, the ZTE may be the best option. However, it's important to consider if the better components of the Poco outweigh the additional cost.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: The Gamer: If you want the smoothest gaming experience possible on a budget, the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT is the better choice with its superior graphics performance.
  • Scenario 2: The Casual User: If all you need is a phone for calls, texts, and some light browsing, the ZTE Blade A75 4G may be sufficient for your needs, especially when price is a factor.
  • Scenario 3: The Tech Enthusiast: If you want a high refresh screen, faster charging, powerful chipset, and a good camera system, the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT is the better choice, as it provides advanced features and a superior experience.

What I would choose and why

If I were choosing between these two phones, I'd go with the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT. The sheer performance difference is too significant to ignore. As someone who uses their phone for everything from productivity tasks to gaming and photography, the Poco X3 GT offers a much more fluid and capable experience. The better display, faster charging, superior camera, and enhanced audio are not just nice to have—they make a noticeable difference in daily usage. The build quality is also better, ensuring that the phone will survive most daily challenges, and the stronger chipset should mean the phone will last much longer before it is no longer supported by games and software. While the lack of expandable storage is a slight drawback, the 256GB internal storage option is enough for my needs. The trade-off between a slightly newer Android OS and the sheer power of the Poco is something I am willing to compromise on for the increase in overall performance, screen quality, and additional features.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.