Xiaomi Poco X3 GT vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 19, 2021 May 13, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 110.31 cm³ 100.96 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 193 g 204 g
Height 163.3 mm 163.3 mm
Width 75.9 mm 73.6 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cloud White
  • Stargaze Black
  • Wave Blue
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Black

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.8 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1116 x 2480
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 92.9 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1500 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 108.13 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.33 mAh/cm³ 49.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G77 MC9 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. Both are intriguing phones, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences. We'll break it down piece by piece to see where each one shines.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here’s a detailed look at the specs, with a focus on what they mean for you in the real world:

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 GTZTE Axon 40 UltraReal-World Implications
Design
Launch Date2021-08-192022-05-13The Axon 40 Ultra is newer, with potentially more up-to-date features and software.
Dimensions163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm163.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mmThe Poco X3 GT is slightly wider and thicker, but both are similar in height.
Weight193g204gThe Poco X3 GT is lighter, which might be preferable for extended use or one-handed operation.
Display
Size6.6"6.8"The Axon 40 Ultra offers a slightly more immersive viewing experience due to its larger screen.
Resolution1080x24001116x2480The Axon 40 Ultra has a sharper display, though the difference might be subtle in daily use.
PPI399400Both have very similar pixel densities, meaning both will look sharp.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDThe Axon 40 Ultra’s AMOLED display offers deeper blacks, better contrast, and more vibrant colors.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth provide smooth scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits1500 nitsThe Axon 40 Ultra is significantly brighter, making it much better for viewing in sunny conditions.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)The Axon 40 Ultra's chip offers more processing power, leading to faster app loading and smoother operation.
AnTuTu Score745,2831,061,300The Axon 40 Ultra has a notably higher benchmark score, suggesting significantly better performance.
GPUMali-G77 MC9Adreno 730The Axon 40 Ultra likely offers better graphics performance for gaming.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth have similar battery sizes, suggesting comparable battery life.
Charging67W Fast Charging65W Fast ChargingThe Poco X3 GT charges slightly faster with its 67W charger.
Camera
Standard Lens64MP, f/1.79, 1/2"64MP, f/1.6, 1/1.72"The Axon 40 Ultra's larger sensor and wider aperture may perform better in low light.
Selfie Lens16MP, f/2.4516MP, f/2.0The Axon 40 Ultra's wider aperture should yield brighter selfies in dimmer environments.
Telephoto LensNone64MP, f/3.5, 1/2"The Axon 40 Ultra offers a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom, a feature the Poco X3 GT lacks.
ToF 3D SensorNone0.3MPThe Axon 40 Ultra offers depth sensing capabilities, typically improving portrait mode quality.
Wide Angle + MacroNone64MP, f/2.3, 1/1.72"The Axon 40 Ultra features a dedicated wide-angle lens for group photos and expansive scenes as well as macro photography
VideoUp to 4K@120fpsUp to 8K@30fpsThe Axon 40 Ultra supports higher resolution video recording, and provides HDR and EIS.
FeaturesTriple Camera, Ultra stable video, manual focusQuadruple camera, OIS, PDAF, LAF, Under display cameraThe Axon 40 Ultra has a more advanced camera system with more features.
Software
OSAndroid 11Android 12 (Upgradable to 13)The Axon 40 Ultra has a newer Android version and confirmed updates.
Connectivity
WiFiWiFi 6WiFi 6 with MiMoSimilar WiFi capabilities, Axon 40 Ultra with the added MiMo for better stability.
Bluetooth5.2 with APT-x, LDAC, AAC5.2The Poco X3 GT supports higher quality audio codecs.
GPSExtensive satellite supportAdvanced dual-band GPSBoth offer robust GPS capabilities, with slightly different support for satellites
SIMDual SIM Dual StandbyDual SIM Dual StandbyBoth support dual SIM cards for easy switching between networks.
Storage
Internal128/256 GB128/256/512/1024 GBThe Axon 40 Ultra has more options and significantly higher storage capacities, useful for those with large media collections.
RAM8GB8/12/16/18GBThe Axon 40 Ultra has more RAM options, enabling smoother performance with intensive tasks.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone supports expandable storage.
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Hi-Res, StereoDTS/DTS:X, StereoBoth feature stereo speakers, but Poco X3 GT offers superior sound features
SecuritySide-mounted fingerprintBasic fingerprint sensorPoco X3 GT features a more convenient side-mounted sensor.
Build QualityCorning Gorilla Glass VictusUnknownThe Poco X3 GT uses a high-end screen protection, while the Axon 40 Ultra's is unlisted.
SensorsComprehensive suiteComprehensive suiteBoth offer robust sensor packages for a variety of functions; Poco X3 GT has virtual ultrasonic proximity, while Axon 40 Ultra has proximity, gravity and hall.

2. Key Insights

  • Xiaomi Poco X3 GT:
    • Strengths: A more affordable phone that packs a punch. It has a robust chipset, a smooth 120Hz display, and fast charging. The stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos are a nice touch for media consumption. It's also lighter and has a more advanced fingerprint sensor. The Corning Gorilla Glass Victus provides superior screen protection.
    • Competitive Advantages: Offers a better audio experience with Dolby Atmos and Hi-Res audio, and a faster charging rate.
    • Limitations: The IPS LCD panel, while good, can't compete with the AMOLED's vibrant colors and contrast, especially in sunlight, and the camera system is not as advanced as the Axon 40 Ultra.
  • ZTE Axon 40 Ultra:
    • Strengths: A powerhouse of a phone with a top-tier chipset, gorgeous AMOLED display, and an incredibly versatile camera system, including an under-display selfie camera. Its expansive storage and RAM options cater to power users.
    • Competitive Advantages: A much brighter screen with more vibrant colors due to its AMOLED display. It has a superior camera system that includes an under display camera, telephoto, wide angle and ToF 3D sensor, and it is capable of recording up to 8K. Its chipset is also much more powerful.
    • Limitations: It is heavier than the Poco X3 GT, and it has a less sophisticated fingerprint scanner. It's also likely to be more expensive.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Xiaomi Poco X3 GT:
    • Best For: Budget-conscious users who want great performance for the price, gamers who don't need the absolute best graphics, and people who prioritize fast charging and solid sound quality.
    • Use Cases: Daily use, moderate gaming, media consumption, and users who don't need telephoto or macro camera options.
  • ZTE Axon 40 Ultra:
    • Best For: Power users, mobile photographers, video enthusiasts, and those who want a flagship-level experience with all the bells and whistles.
    • Use Cases: Professional photography, videography, heavy gaming, and users who require massive storage and RAM.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three practical questions to help you decide:

  1. Budget: How much are you willing to spend? If budget is your primary concern, the Poco X3 GT will be more accessible. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is going to be in a premium price range.
  2. Display Needs: Do you need a vibrant display with excellent outdoor visibility? If so, the Axon 40 Ultra is superior with its AMOLED panel.
  3. Camera Demands: How important is a versatile, high-quality camera system? The Axon 40 Ultra is a much better option, with a dedicated telephoto, wide angle, ToF 3D, and a very high video quality.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1 (Budget Gamer): If you're a gamer on a budget, the Poco X3 GT offers excellent performance for the price.
  • Scenario 2 (Photography Enthusiast): If you live to take pictures and videos, the Axon 40 Ultra is a much better tool, giving you great versatility.
  • Scenario 3 (Power User): If you want the best possible performance, with the most storage and RAM available, the Axon 40 Ultra is the clear winner, but at a higher price point.
  • Scenario 4 (Value-Focused User): If you need a great everyday phone with solid performance at a reasonable price point, the Poco X3 GT has you covered.

Personal Choice

If I were choosing between these two devices, I would lean towards the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. The primary reason is that, as a tech journalist and someone who spends a lot of time on my phone for media consumption and photography, the AMOLED screen is a huge advantage, offering much more vibrant colors and brightness. Also, the versatility and the quality of the Axon 40 Ultra's camera system, plus its significantly better performance, are too enticing for me to pass up. I also really enjoy a seamless experience, so a good performance and smooth user experience is really important for my personal needs. While the Poco X3 GT is a strong contender in the value segment and provides a great experience for the price, the Axon 40 Ultra just delivers a superior all-around experience in the areas that matter most to me, even at a higher cost.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.