Xiaomi Poco X3 GT vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 19, 2021 April 22, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 110.31 cm³ 94.68 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.7 "/g
Weight 193 g 181 g
Height 163.3 mm 163.7 mm
Width 75.9 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8.9 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cloud White
  • Stargaze Black
  • Wave Blue
  • White
  • Gray
  • Mint

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 87 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 450 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.33 mAh/cm³ 52.81 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G77 MC9 Adreno 642L

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT and the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. These two phones occupy a similar space in the market, but they have some key differences that will make one a better fit for different users. Let's break it down.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a detailed look at the specs, categorized for clarity, along with real-world implications:

FeatureXiaomi Poco X3 GTSamsung Galaxy A73 5GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions163.3 × 75.9 × 8.9 mm163.7 × 76.1 × 7.6 mmThe Samsung is slightly taller and wider but noticeably thinner. The Xiaomi is thicker and has a slightly larger volume which could feel bulkier in hand and pocket.
Weight193g181gSamsung feels slightly lighter, which may be noticeable during extended use.
Display
Size6.6"6.7"Samsung offers a slightly larger display, which can be great for media consumption.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both have the same sharp resolution, ensuring crisp visuals.
PPI399393Both have very similar pixel densities, providing a sharp image, with the Xiaomi having a slightly sharper picture, very similar in practice.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDAMOLED on Samsung provides deeper blacks, higher contrast, more vibrant colors and is better for battery usage with dark mode, a more premium viewing experience.
Refresh Rate120Hz120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsSame peak brightness.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm)Xiaomi's Dimensity 1100 scores significantly higher in benchmarks indicating better overall performance, app loading and smoother operation for heavy use and gaming.
Antutu Score745,283575,551Xiaomi is noticeably faster in benchmarks, it should translate into snappier app performance.
GPUMali-G77 MC9Adreno 642LDifferent GPUs that handle graphics processing, Xiaomi's Mali-G77 MC9 usually better for heavy gaming.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar capacity suggests comparable battery life.
Charging67W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingXiaomi charges much faster getting you back up and running quicker.
Battery TypeLi-PolymerLi-IonNo major practical difference.
Camera
Rear Camera64MP (f/1.79)108MP (f/1.8)Samsung’s higher resolution provides more detail, especially for cropping. The Xiaomi’s wider aperture may result in better low-light performance.
Front Camera16MP (f/2.45)32MP (f/2.2)Samsung's selfie camera has higher resolution and a wider aperture, which is better for selfies in low light.
Wide Angle LensNo12MP (f/2.2)Samsung’s wide-angle lens gives you more versatility when taking photos.
Depth SensorNo5MP (f/2.4)Samsung's depth sensor enhances portrait mode.
Macro LensNo5MP (f/2.4)Samsung’s Macro lens allows for close-up shots.
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps (Both with EIS)Both offer 4K video, but Samsung offers EIS for video stabilization which can provide smoother, more stable videos. Xiaomi lacks EIS but offers a higher slow motion frame rate.
Camera FeaturesTriple Camera, Digital Image Stabilisation, Ultra Stable Video, Autofocus, Touch Focus, Manual Focus, Continuous Shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face Detection, White Balance Settings, ISO Settings, Exposure Compensation, Scene Mode, Self-timer, RAW, Night ModeQuadruple Camera, Digital Image Stabilisation, Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS), Autofocus, Touch Focus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Continuous Shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face Detection, White Balance Settings, ISO Settings, Exposure Compensation, Scene Mode, Self-timerXiaomi has additional features for pro users such as RAW image capture, manual focus, and ultra-stable video. Samsung benefits from optical image stabilization, offering better videos and low light photos.
Software
OSAndroid 11Android 12 (upgradable to 16)Samsung has a newer OS out of the box and offers up to 4 software updates for longevity.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, 802.11n 5GHz, 802.11ac, WiFi 6 (802.11ax)802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, 802.11n 5GHz, 802.11ac, WiFi 6 (802.11ax)Both devices have the same Wi-Fi technology with Dual band, Wi-Fi Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.2 LEBluetooth 5.0Xiaomi has the latest Bluetooth technology for faster and more reliable connection, better audio quality and improved energy efficiency.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, BeiDou (B1)GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoXiaomi has support for more satellite systems for more accurate location.
SIMDual SIM Dual Standby (Nano SIM + Nano SIM)Dual SIM Dual Standby (Nano SIM + Nano SIM)Both devices support dual SIM functionality.
Storage
Internal128 GB or 256 GB128 GB or 256 GBBoth offer the same storage options.
RAM8 GB6 GB or 8 GBBoth devices provide enough RAM to handle everyday tasks and games.
Expandable StorageNoNoNo expandable storage for either phone
Audio
QualityDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphonesDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersXiaomi offers additional features for better audio quality and enhanced spatial audio.
Security
Featuresside-mounted fingerprint sensorbasic fingerprint sensorXiaomi offers more advanced fingerprint authentication.
Build Quality
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass VictusCorning Gorilla Glass 5Xiaomi's screen uses newer and more durable glass.
SensorsBiometric: Fingerprint; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope; Proximity: Ultrasonic proximity virtualBiometric: Fingerprint; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope; Proximity: Ultrasonic proximity virtual, Geomagnetic, RGBSamsung includes additional sensors for advanced features and gaming.

2. Key Insights

Xiaomi Poco X3 GT:

  • Strengths: Performance powerhouse thanks to the Dimensity 1100 chipset, faster 67W charging, better screen protection with Gorilla Glass Victus, better audio with Hi-Res and dual mics, advanced Bluetooth and more precise GPS.
  • Competitive Advantages: Ideal for mobile gaming and demanding tasks. It offers a smoother experience overall and faster charging.
  • Trade-offs: Lacks the versatility of a wide-angle lens on the camera, and uses a less premium IPS LCD display panel, less software update support.

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G:

  • Strengths: Vibrant AMOLED display, more versatile camera with OIS, wide-angle, depth and macro lenses, a higher resolution front camera, expandable software support.
  • Competitive Advantages: A well-rounded camera setup for diverse shooting scenarios. It excels at content consumption and offers an overall great camera experience.
  • Trade-offs: Slower charging at 25W, lower benchmark scores than the Poco X3 GT, which means it can struggle under heavy loads. The screen uses older generation Gorilla Glass 5.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • The Gamer/Power User (Xiaomi Poco X3 GT): If you prioritize smooth performance and gaming, the Poco X3 GT is the clear winner with its superior chipset and faster charging.

  • The Casual Photographer (Samsung Galaxy A73 5G): If you value a versatile camera, love taking photos, and prioritize a vibrant screen for media consumption, the A73 5G is the better choice.

  • The Everyday User (Samsung Galaxy A73 5G): If you need a phone that handles daily tasks well and offers a premium visual and software experience with great long term support, the Samsung is likely the better pick.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to consider:

  1. How important is gaming performance? If it’s a top priority, go for the Poco X3 GT. Otherwise, the A73 5G may be good enough for most.
  2. Do you need a versatile camera? If you want to take lots of different types of photos, the Samsung’s wide-angle, depth, and macro lenses are hard to beat.
  3. Do you value a vibrant AMOLED display and longer software support? If this is important, the Samsung is the better choice.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Heavy Mobile Gamer
    • Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco X3 GT. The Dimensity 1100 offers better gaming performance and the fast charging keeps you in the game.
  • Scenario 2: Social Media Enthusiast
    • Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. The higher resolution cameras and versatile lens setup provide a more compelling camera system and the AMOLED display ensures your content looks its best.
  • Scenario 3: Multitasker
    • Recommendation: Xiaomi Poco X3 GT. Although both phones perform well with day-to-day tasks, the Xiaomi has the edge for demanding multitasking and a faster overall experience.

My Choice

If I had to pick, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT. While the Samsung A73 5G is a more well-rounded device, I prioritize the raw performance and faster charging of the Xiaomi. As someone who enjoys mobile gaming and demanding apps, the Dimensity 1100 and 67W fast charging are hard to overlook. While I would miss the AMOLED screen and the versatility of Samsung’s camera setup, the overall snappier experience of the Xiaomi is my preference. Ultimately, I can live without the versatility of the camera of the Samsung for the additional speed and performance of the Xiaomi.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.